Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please can someone advise re my ex's bankruptcy and my home..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5603 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've only just found this forum and it looks like many of you on here give great advice.

Please can someone help me...

I'm a single mum of 3 children. My husband and I separated about 3 years ago when I was pregnant with my last child. He was declared bankrupt 3 years ago. We jointly own a property which I live in (for now) with the children. He lives elsewhere. We've both been breaking our backs to keep up with the mortgage repayments which is in joint names. However his trustees called me today stating they were meeting tomorrow to discuss whether to put the house up for sale. It's been up for sale by myself for a year with no joy as I wanted rid as painlessly as possible.

 

We're mortgaged to the hilt and cannot afford to buy the beneficial interest in the property which isn't a lot only 5 thousand. I don't know if we'll be forced to sell or have a charging order placed on our home. Either way sounds grim to be honest. We also have a suspended possession order hanging over our heads and are beginning to wonder if its worth paying the mortgage at all as we're really struggling and are in a no win situation, either the trustees will take the house or the mortgage company. I really am at my wits end about what to do, I feel like handing in the house keys, but who to?. I could really walk away but I'm worried about the consequences especially for the children.

Any advice about this difficult situation is much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel so sorry to hear what you are going through and is great that even though you and your partner are seperated, you are both trying so damn hard to provide for the children. It does seem like a very complex situation your in and like you have said the house has been on the market with no joy, therefore wouldnt personally think it would be in the trustees best interest to take the house if there is no equity in it after the mortgage is re-paid.

 

You could hand the keys back to the mortgage company but this could create new problems for you as they would normally sell the house, maybe at auction and any shortfall they would come to you and your ex-partner for. This would then create you further heartache for further years so would be really wary bout doing this.

 

Have you possibly looked at going into a rented accomadation for a bit? Maybe its a possibility if you have had enough of the house and its not worth the grief or stress to contact the trustee and tell them they can take it.

 

Obviously im no expert but am trying to support in ways I can, on my rough ride over the past 9 years have learnt a few things hence what I have written above. Especially with regard to the house.

 

Keep us posted hey and stay positive

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know much about situations like this but I do know that you do not hand the keys back, because you will have made yourself intentionally homeless, if you want the council to re house you, you need to be evicted. So, all the other stuff I do not know about, but this is something that you need to keep in mind for the future, as for the house, at the end of the day, it is just bricks and mortar, the important thing is that you and your children are together and happy. If letting the house go means that you can have a clean start somewhere else, then perhaps it is something to consider, but do not hand the keys back, make them evict you.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point, also forgot that bit myself, you would be chased for any shortfall and as Lula has stated, you would in theory have made yourself homeless. Second that, stay put and make them evict you.

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Lula and stinkyfeet for your replies and support, I don't feel so alone now. I have been ringing legal organisations like mad to try and sort this situation out. I also phoned the estate agents that the house is marketed with and they state that the housing market is dismal and it may be worth much less than it is marketed for, the price hasn't changed for 6 months. If this is the case it will then be in negative equity.

I will stay put and let them evict me. It will be hard (I'm crying as I write this) but it seems the best option. Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok then if you have decided that waiting for eviction is the best solution, then stop paying the mortgage and save up for a deposit and a few months rent on a new place.

How much is the shortfall likely to be following your conversation with the estate agent, and do you have other debts.

What are rental prices like in your area?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gizmo,

Just spoken to the trustee, they've told me they're unlikely to sell the property in the current market. They want to put a charging order on it or come to some arrangement with my ex re him paying the 5 thousand in instalments which he can't afford. We're just keeping our heads above water as it is.

I have an appointment with a solicitor next week and have contacted 3 estate agents to give me valuations tomorrow on the property's current price. If is in negatative equity I was by a friend told I can buy the beneficial interest for a nominal fee from the trustees. Though I doubt they'd agree to it as they want as much money as possible. Does anyone know anything about this?

 

Renting is expensive in my area, it's just the same as the mortgage. Yes I do have other debts but my main concern is the mortgage and I can't face those. Gizmo I think the shortfall may be between 3-8 thousand. Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see how they can put a charge on a property for more than its worth - what was the exact date of his BR?

The rents may be the same as the mortgage but would you be entitled to some benefit to help with it? Check Start Calculation

The shortfall is quite small so it is probably worth hanging on - have you tried ot remortgage to a better rate in your name? Maybe consider interest only for a couple of years to give you a chance to tackle the other debts in your name?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try to stay positive and dont get upset, its a terrible situation and I for one feel more confident daily since finding this forum and having the support and advice given.

As Gizmo111 said above, another cracking idea to bring the mortgage payment down could well be worth looking at going onto interest only, this should reduce your payments somewhat to free up a bit more case each month. This could be used to crack on with other debts, save towards rented or even come up with a payment plan to pay the ex-partners interest out of the property.

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gizmo and Stinkyfeet,

This forum has indeed been a godsend to many, me included. Sadly we are only paying interest on the mortgage until our situation improves. We are trying to keep the house if possible but if it becomes no longer viable we will concede defeat knowing we have tried everything possible to keep the property. I am already looking into other housing options suggested by you both and Lula. He was made bankrupt at the end of Feb 2006 I think. So the 3 years is up very soon, and we've tried really hard to sell the property ourselves with no luck.

I am so grateful for all the words of support from you. With that and my childrens smiling faces I will carry on and try not to get too down about it, it really has kept me going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A charging order may not be a totally bad thing as this at least lets you keep the house for you and the children and would only kick in upon sale of the property I think. This means you could sit on the house for 5 / 10 / 15 years and only upon the sale would they be paid. Am I correct in assuming that they are only looking for half of any possible equity?

If this was the case and the country gets back on its feet in the future, you could sell the home when it has equity back in it and least your half would be yours to go towards a deposit for a new home.

 

Am pretty sure this is how charging orders work, hopefully someone could confirm further to hopefully bring you a little light.

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stinkyfeet, yes it is for only half of the property. I will ride it out and see what happens. I was unsure of the amount they'd charge to the property. My ex was made bankrupt for £25000. Would they apply that amount for the charge or only half of what equity is on the house at this present time? I've no idea to be honest. Well I have to look on the bright side a charging order is a far better alternative than an order for sale. Stinkyfeet you really have kept me positive through this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see how they can put a charge on a property for more than its worth

 

A charging order secures the debt on the property. While the primary object is to recover the debt you should not forget that a secondary objective is to prevent the disposal of the property.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Palomino, does this mean they will secure the full £25000 on the house or will it be the £5000 they wanted me or my ex to pay now. Really unsure of how this works. Also a friend of mine stated I could add conditions to the charging order preventing the Trustees selling the property until my youngest reaches 16 or 18 if in full time education. Is this true?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A charging order is simply a 'lock' for want of a better term. There is no amount mentioned.

 

When the property is to be transferred the Land Registry will not re-register the property until the person/organisation who obtained the charging order issues a certificate to say that the charging order has been discharged.

Obviously they would not do that until any outstanding monies were paid, although in practice there are likely to be negotiations of the 'who blinks first' variety.

Edited by palomino
Spelling

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs!

 

Keep us posted - there are many people here who are interested in your experiences.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...