Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Portfolio 1 LTD. Help!


mikkg86
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly who on earth are these people? Iv read they are some sort of DCA.

 

Heres my problem...

 

Im looking at my credit file which is all fine except this one default from 2006. It states that they are the company name and the account type is communications.

That means nothing to me as iv never heard of them or know what communications could possibly be.

Even worse its for nearly £1000 and its classed as a default which i dont want on my credit file for obv reasons.

 

Should i get in contact with them to find out what its for? The things iv read about them suggest they are not the most honest people and i should tell them to bugger off.

Any help is greatly appreciated

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im looking at my credit file which is all fine except this one default from 2006. It states that they are the company name and the account type is communications.

Should i get in contact with them to find out what its for?

Thanks

Lowell Portfolio I are a Debt collection agency as you thought, if you look about the site, mainly in the http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/telecoms-mobile-fixed/ forum, and you will see that Lowell/Mackenzie hall/Red debt collection services appear to be having a run on with claiming "debts" being owed to various mobile phone companies, 3G, O2 etc etc.

Pretty certain that they have done a search and it may say "unrecorded search" ?

Have they contacted you about this yet? Are you 100% that you have never had a mobile phone contract? What is the date they did the search? October 2008 by any chance? If they do, or you have already, been contacted by them about this a simple letter that you do not acknowledge any debt to this company.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to ******* Mobile

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your Name) Print do not sign

 

Your next course of action should be to question why they have done a search on your credit file without your permission, whilst this is not illegal it is very underhand and you might like to report the matter to the credit reference agency.:?:

If it is a genuine error on your credit file then you should be able to get it removed.

Remember unless you can record your phone conversations, NEVER EVER TALK TO THEM OVER THE PHONE, put everything in writing and tell them to do the same.;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya thanks for the advice.

It is in October so i take it im not the only one who has an issue with them.

I dont have any ref number or account number or anything from them and i have never recieved a letter or phonecall from them ever. They just appeared on my credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya thanks for the advice.

It is in October so i take it im not the only one who has an issue with them.

I dont have any ref number or account number or anything from them and i have never recieved a letter or phonecall from them ever. They just appeared on my credit file.

 

 

Get the "I do not acknowledge this debt" letter above off to them asap then and wait to see what they respond with

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does this look to send off to them????

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

After receiving my credit report I have noticed that your company are on it reporting a default.

You are claiming a debt of £* with a default of £* on 25/05/2007.

I do not acknowledge this debt as my own.

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to yourself or another company which you may or may not be connected to.

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

I look forward to your reply.

Yours faithfully

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the "I do not acknowledge this debt" letter above off to them asap then and wait to see what they respond with

Sorry I disagree, but am open to comments :)

I don't think you need to send a letter to them saying that you do not acknowledge any debt, the prove it template I posted earlier in the thread. If they have not approached you for payment, why jump the gun and give them the opportunity? Does your credit file definitely say "Default" and is the entry by Lowell for "communications"? If it is then send the clowns this:

Dear Sirs,

 

I have discovered that you are illegally processing my data without proving any debt exists between your company & myself.

 

Please note you may consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit. You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint. I therefore request a copy of your official complaints procedure which you are obliged to supply.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Sit back and wait for them to reply, and also make a complaint to the credit reference agency, stating that you are not happy that this unknown debt, which is strongly disputed in light of the fact that it is fictitious, and that they have allowed a search of your file to be made without your knowledge and they have also allowed a fictitious debt to be placed on your file as a default. When/if Lowell reply, make sure you get a copy of their complaints procedure, something which I have been asking them for for three months now! And also get them to remove this default from your file if it is going to affect you in anyway. Somebody else will be better suited to advise you of the necessary action and letter templates you need in order to get this done, or take a look around the other threads to see if you can find the answers. Let us know if you require any thing further? Don't forget, all in writing, recorded delivery, print don't sign or look hereMyLiveSignature - Creating a signature using the signature creation wizard:wink:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks a lot. I have got in touch with my CRA and ill see what they say. It does def say default and communications on my credit report. They have also searched aswell. Ill use this letter above and hopefully get them off my credit file.

Bloody swines!!

 

Ok glad to help. Don't know how long it takes for them to remove it off your credit file :confused: but having not even approached you for the alleged debt and to put a default marker on your credit file without your knowledge is very naughty!:-x

 

Let us Know how you get on:cool:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My CRA has now informed me that they are getting in touch with Lowell and are investigating the matter on behalf of myself.

Thats some great service and well worth a few quid a month!

Will keep you up to date

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

yes I received a reply from my cra.

When they got in touch with Lowell they told them i was due them money for a 3 phone account which is weird because iv never had a 3 phone.

They coudlnt remove them from my credit report because of this "outstanding" balance.

Iv since sent a letter to Lowell. One of the drafts from above.

That was 6 weeks ago and still not heard anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mikkg86.

 

That is crazy, Lowell f*c* up and you still suffer with the consequences. If you dont here back from Lowell how are you going to get it removed from your file ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really dont have a clue. I dont know of any other way that it can be removed other than from my CRA but they cant remove it without the permission of Lowell.

 

So catch 22 because they are saying its my debt when it isnt.

Very frustrating

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you send them this template?

Dear Sirs,

 

I have discovered that you are illegally processing my data without proving any debt exists between your company & myself.

 

Please note you may consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit. You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint. I therefore request a copy of your official complaints procedure which you are obliged to supply.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

If not, send it ASAP. If you did, then they are in default, speak to the CRA again and tell them that you have had no reply from Lowell, they have not supplied any evidence as to the alleged debt in question, they also have not supplied you with their complaints procedure, nor have they ever contacted you surrounding this alleged debt. The CRA has allowed them to place this default on your credit file, they must remove it, ask them for their complaints procedure also.

I know that the OFT don't look into individual complaints, but it will not harm writing to them to complain about Lowell, the more people that do the more chance of them taking some action:lol:

If you can write to your CRA and send them exactly what you have sent Lowell, so they can see you mean business.

I'll try and find Lowell's complaint procedures, as without having gone throught their complaints process first no-one else will really want to entertain the complaint.

Had a look on the debt buyers and sellers group DBSG website got the CEO's details;

Lowell Group Enterprise House

1 Apex View

 

Leeds

LS11 9BH

 

Contact: Mr J Cornell

Phone: 0854 3009410

Fax: 0845 3009411

Email: [email protected]

Link: www.lowell.co.uk

Activity: Buyer

Services: Consumer Credit

 

And also Credit Services Association (CSA)

 

Might be worth sending them a snot-o-gram about Lowell:confused:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the letter i sent them couple of months ago. I will tell my CRA that i have not heard from Lowell at all. I will send this letter once more to them and see what happens. Thanks for your advice.

 

And i can think of something a bit more meaningful than a snot-o-gram to send those gits! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...