Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Redstone/HML: Why can they get away with it?


JMJVB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There have been many comments on these forums regarding sub-prime mortgage companies and the devious ways in which they operate. Why are they still getting away with inflicting misery on countless homeowners? So many oblivious borrowers have been duped into taking on what they think is a "mortgage" with Redstone or Kensington, without knowing that it is not a mortgage at all but a securitised debt, and that Redstone etc. are not mortgage lenders but glorified debt collectors. A company called Homeloan Management runs these imaginary mortgage companies and collects the monthly payments, without the innocent borrower ever finding out unless they happen to read these forums. Their sole aim is to repossess their victims' properties, which they will do without negotiation as soon as the victim falls into arrears by 2 months.

PLEASE, is there no way that those of us who have been led into this trap can rise up and do something to have these companies stamped out? What about an online petition to the government, or a campaign in the newspapers to spread as much information as possible to the public about what is going on?

The FSA turns a blind eye. Despite complaints, they have done nothing. The government either does not know or does not care, same with the judicial system. I read yesterday that Redstone are now trying to repossess an animal sanctuary. How low can they stoop?

Let's unite against **** like this NOW. A mass protest is needed. Even now, more unsuspecting people are being sold "mortgages" with Redstone, and in doing so are giving up their chance of ever owning their property, are taking on a huge unmanageable debt, and most probably signing away their homes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This is what I sent:

 

I am writing to you to ask why no one is putting pressure on the sub prime lenders to lower their interest rates.

Every day in the press we read that the High Street banks are being told they must do more to help borrowers but nothing is being said to the companies who through their greed and bad practices have caused part of this financial crisis.

There are companies such as Southern Pacific Mortgages Limited, Kensington, and Preferred Mortgages that are still charging their borrowers high interest.

I have a mortgage with SPML and fortunately it is relatively small, but they charge 4.25% plus LIBOR so when my fixed rate ended in May I was paying nearly 10%. When I took out the mortgage I was not told what would happen to it, i.e that after 3 months it would be securitized and traded. I was unaware that the company, Capstone Mortgage Services that I make my payments too were nothing more than debt collectors. Capstone are not able to offer any help to lenders, they are not allowed to alter the terms of the mortgage to capitalise arrears or offer payment breaks or any of the help offered by prime lenders.

There are also the sub prime secured loan companies such as Welcome, Blemain finance, Firstplus and more. These too are charging interest rates of 14% on average but also refuse to lower them. I have a secured loan with Blemain and when I asked why their rates remain so high I was just told that their rates are not linked to BOE and they were not in a position to cut them.

There are many people with mortgages and loans with such companies who are now struggling and many are facing eviction but it seems nothing is being done by the powers that be to put any pressure on them.

Most of us who have been unfortunate to have these loans are not greedy borrowers but have been put in the unfortunate position of being told by bad advisors, who gain huge commission payments that these were our best options.

I feel that as these companies have been the cause of much of this crisis and should be closed down and as a result forfeiting any gains they make and the borrowers should have their interest rates cut to 0% for the remainder of their agreements.

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Midge,

 

I will be using this in a similar way, if you dont mind, and posting to my Local Lib Dem councilor plus my local MP.

 

Can you point me in the right direction, for a letter to FOS regarding arrears management fees and exessive charges on the mortgage account too, and anyone else really, where i will make a few waves too ??

 

Kind regards

 

B-O-2

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have actually put in a complaint against my mort company to the FOS but I don't know if they would take much notice of a letter.

 

I suppose we could write to the OFT but again they don't deal with individual complaints but if they get enough I suppose they should look into it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can deffinately count me in, Anything that will get the powers to be to sit up and take notice and get join the real world !!!!

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, to all of you out there who are willing to get together and make a stand against Redstone and other sub prime companies. I am willing to write to the OFT and make a collective complaint on your behalf. If you would like to PM me I will send you my address for you to send your own complaint/grievance/story. I will then send them all off en masse to the OFT and see if we can get something done to bring these parasites to justice. Anything is worth a try!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys, Great idea JMJVB !

 

Having just fought (with a lot of help from the great people on this site) the 2nd notice of eviction from SPML last wednesday and just getting back to some normality from it, Could you giv me some guidance as to what things i need to include in my statement that would help the cause ?

 

Help really appreciated, thanks.

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...