Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
    • Hello I am a resident of a communal block of flats owned by a Housing Association and since Tuesday 14th May 2024 Matthews and Tannert had put up scaffolding for a job on the roof last week, which was up for the best part of nine days. They had removed the scaffolding on Thursday 23rd May 2024 but my Sky box is still not working because of the satellite dish outside, and I was wondering whether the scaffolders had touched the dish while it was there and as a result had probably knocked the dish and probably made the dish go out of signal or whatever. I needed someone to check this out as well as to see my Sky box to see what could be the problem, and hopefully sort this out. I have had my Sky Digibox for many years and I have got recordings saved on them that I have had a long time - it would break my heart if I had lost them forever.       I contacted Sky but I almost made the mistake of accepting an offer where I would have to pay £31.50 and wait a whole month without television in my front room for it. I am in debt at the moment and I don't want all this on top of everything else - thankfully I have since cancelled it two weeks later when I told the person on the phone that it is the dish which is at fault as well as the fact that I live in a communal Housing Association property, and so that is one of very few weights off my mind. I emailed the Housing Association's Repairs department and they said that they will contact an electrical company to come out and see to the dish outside. I received a telephone call on Friday 24th May from the man to say that he will arrive on Wednesday 29th May 2024 to do the job. He arrived at around 9.40 am on Wednesday as promised; he went into my flat and had a look at the Sky box and saw the blue screen on my front room TV set, indicating no signal. He also looked outside as to where the dish was.  The main problem was that the ladders that he had with him were not enough to reach the dish outside as the dish was towards the top of the building - obviously the Health and Safety aspect of the job didn't allow him to do this. He then mentioned that whether he could do the job as a result of getting onto the roof and doing it like that as the dish is closer to the top. He said that he needed the key to enter the loft part of the building in order to reach this, and he needed to contact the Housing Officer at the Housing Association who had key to this, but lo and behold, he came on the Wednesday to do the job, and guess what? Wednesday was the Housing Officer's day off and so therefore he was unable to contact him for the key so that he could do the job! I just couldn't believe it myself. I am personally annoyed because this has not been sorted, and the man who came to do this is also annoyed because he came all the way to Nottingham from Peterborough, and he said to me that he won't get paid if he cannot do the job, so you see, we are both angry about this for different reasons. We are both in the same boat with regards to frustration, and we both want to see a conclusion to this, once and for all. Sometimes I wish that I didn't live in a flat which is in a communal building and I am thinking of getting a transfer to a one bedroom flat that isn't in that sort of place. I pay around £85 a month in a Direct Debit to Sky to receive their TV services which I cannot use at the moment, and I don't have much money in my bank account as it is due to one thing and another. I also pay nearly £14 a month to TV Licensing so that I can legally watch TV in my front room. I pay for Sky hence the fact that I want the Sky service in my front room and not Freeview. Also, as the General Election is coming up in five weeks' time, I want the satellite TV to be working properly so that I can catch up with what is on the news channels, and I feel rather "cut off" from that at the moment, and I want it working in time for Thursday 4th July 2024 for ovbious reasons . I have Freeview in my bedroom, but that is not the point  - I don't want to be limited to my bedroom every time I want to watch TV. I have tried putting the Freeview in te front room but it doesn't seem compatable for the same uses that I usually have Sky for.  Sunday 9th June 2024 is Day 27 of the satellite TV not working in my flat, and I feel that something needs to be done about this. You can take this message as a complaint if you like, but nevertheless, I want this message to be acknowledged and also something to be done about what has happened. I have enough on my plate with regards to health problems and depression without things like this making things worse. I would appreciate it if something was done.  I don't like naming and shaming but it is Matthews and Tannert's fault that I am in this situation in the first place, and sometimes I wish that I could sue them. In a nutshell, I have had more than enough after being without TV in the my front room for nearly four weeks. Also, at a time like this, I am missing so much of interest on TV what with the General Election comning up in just a few weeks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

babegem v Phoenix recoveries/HSBC


babegem
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 261
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

 

 

Had a look at it but couldnt see the tutorial, so looked up the IMG link,

 

have now posted the claim doc...

 

Remembering the accounts I had were three thrown into one, pleas see the particulars state is for overdrawn bank account.

 

Have drafted my directions, are you able to comment/advise?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are stating that the debt is an overdraft, take a statement in showing your last account useage and say that the remainder looks to have been added up by excessive / unlawful penatly charges !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Thanks for your help...

 

Yes I put a CPR re in on 20th Dec and got back a CCA for my loan (other account ref), a letter of assignment to L & R from HSBC and a notice from Largo (L & R) saying they have been assigned it from Phoenix. The account refs on letters are the same, but not as the CCA or the claim (different again)

 

That was all. Received on 10th Jan and nothing since. Says, we will be able to provide your other requests in due course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following requests were 'referred back to their client (Phoenix or HSBC?) and they stated they shall "revert back shortly".

c. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

d.Documents relating to any insurance added to the account/s, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted.

e. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

f. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

i. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement."

 

In letter dated 23rd December, from L&R, but still have heard nothing more.

Edited by babegem
font issues
Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is a current account overdraft that is made up entirely of charges, can you ask for stay until the determination by the OFT/Bank court case. After all, our reclaim claims are being stayed until the outcome !.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are absoloutely right! I have a letter from HSBC saying that they would apply for the stay if I pursued, and they are all aware of the dispute.

 

The problem that I have is that the portions that are charges have not been investigated (but have been acknowledged by HSBC and L&R) yet. So these sums are a mystery! I have an estimate in my defence for this but it only goes up to year or so ago re interest.

 

How can I phrase this and do I put this into the draft order for directions or where? Can I put this is the AQ somewhere?

Edited by babegem
more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

:eek:

 

Does anyone know If I can apply for a stay as the account in Claim, is disputed due to unfair charges, and the creditor have failed to respond to dispute, or particularise the claim or supply support docs as per CPR?

 

I need to get my AQ back in less than 48 hours and have work tomorrow,

 

limit on time! Please help me...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a guide to completing the AQ, but I'd like to see your defence too if you could post it please. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html#post90317

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any law I can refer to in my AQ about no letter before action?

 

Can I request copy and proof sent of this in my directions?

 

Failure of the Claimant to supply a sufficient letter before action

 

34. The claimant has in the defendants opinion failed to conduct themselves in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules insofar that they failed to issue a letter before action compliant with the CPR preaction protocols which state

4.3

The claimant's letter should -

(a)

give sufficient concise details to enable the recipient to understand and investigate the claim without extensive further information;

 

(b)

enclose copies of the essential documents which the claimant relies on;

 

©

identify and ask for copies of any essential documents, not in his possession, which the claimant wishes to see;

 

(d)

state (if this is so) that the claimant wishes to enter into mediation or another alternative method of dispute resolution; and

 

(e)

draw attention to the court's powers to impose sanctions for failure to comply with this practice direction and, if the recipient is likely to be unrepresented, enclose a copy of this practice direction.

 

Yes, put them to strict proof.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

[/i]

 

Yes, put them to strict proof.

[/indent]

 

Hi DocH,

 

Please advise the source of your second quote, and where I can add a summary in the AQ?

 

For example, do I put in the more information or in the directions or both?

 

Would this do the trick in the directions:

 

"The defendant puts the claimant to strict proof that the required documents were served before legal action was initiated, for example, no letter before action"

 

Thanks again...

Edited by babegem
font
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Babegem...just subscribing...

I haven't got through all of this yet, but would point out the following (sorry if you know this already):

Phoenix Recoveries purpotedly buy debt from the likes of HSBC, at a major discount and then try to strongarm recovery, by using L&R (Legal & Receivables) / LARGO Law (all same company). Names sound legal...but are just debt collectors...LARGO Law my 'associate' themselves with Caseys Solicitors, but 'Litigation executives'....are not solicitors at law.

 

Debts cannot simply be lumped together, each claim must be substantiated separately, with all necessary evidential paperwork....as on most of the forum's advice...any one of them should fail, if insufficient proof of agreement/default/assignment/amounts etc.

Flexiloans/personal loans are still loans and not overdrafts/bank accounts, so dont be fobbed off by this...so under CCA law and each requires production (and proof of delivery) of all relevant paperwork.

If the accounts are old enough to fall under CCA 1974 (pre 2006 I think ?), then look up several forum cases 'won' for specific guidance and references.

If they have not got paperwork proof as formal evidence served properly on each agreement, then each needs to be challenged on its own merits.

If the account numbers/amounts are different to yours, then you should also defend on basis of not recognising their claim......eg.could have any number of debt collectors chasing....you are simply trying to determine their rights to collect on that specific debt...

 

Try not to be too upset by LARGO Law....and try not to panic too much....by the time it comes to being heard, you'll probably know more about the CCA rules than they do...

 

Good luck and keep reading similar threads.

 

BP

BeanPole :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DocH,

 

Please advise the source of your second quote, and where I can add a summary in the AQ?

 

For example, do I put in the more information or in the directions or both?

 

Would this do the trick in the directions:

 

"The defendant puts the claimant to strict proof that the required documents were served before legal action was initiated, for example, no letter before action"

 

Thanks again...

 

Sure. From the Justice.gov.uk site here:

 

CPR - Rules & Practice Directions

 

The quote from the CPR would need to go into an amended defence, or may be suitable for a Witness Statement. Those with more experience will advise.

 

In your directions you should be asking the judge to order the claimant to provide you with a true copy of the letter before action.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...