Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the National Consumer Service Buying any goods or any services??? A used car? - Paying by cash or bank transfer??? - BIG Fail!Share the love – Tell a friend about the Consumer Action Group - your National Consumer ServiceAre you buying a used car...? Protect yourself – read our used car guideESSENTIAL:: Read our Customer Services Guide!!!Twitter - Why you should open a Twitter account ESSENTIAL:: Read our Customer Services Guide!!!Have we helped you today...? Please help the CAG Had a car accident? Been offered a courtesy car?Follow @Real_CAG Parcel Delivery Insurance is Unlawful - The TimesWhy don't you change your profile picture?? Problem with utilities company or phone/broadband? Begin by sending a statutory request for your personal data. It’s free    Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.× Financial Legal Issues Complete My Profile Dismiss Next Step: Profile Photo (Profile Photo and Cover Photo) Your profile is 0% complete! Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why… The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini' Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.  You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do Rate this topic By citizenB March 4, 2014 in Financial Legal Issues style="text-align: center;">     Thread Locked because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days. If you need to add something to this thread then   Please click the "Report " link   at the bottom of one of the posts.   If you want to post a new story then Please Start your own new thread That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help    Thanks   citizenB Posted March 4, 2014 #1   The questionnaires below provide important information which will allow us to help you. In order to use them, you will have to copy them into your own post and then give us the answers – preferably in red below each question. You can start by overwriting the prompt: "Give answer here" below each question – and your responses should automatically appear in red   Thank you +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++   You have received a claim form.   firstly - read all the posts in this thread FIRST...   then copy this first msg to your thread - and put your answer after each question   In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us]     Which Court have you received the claim from ? Name County Court   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS)     Name of the Claimant ? Give answer here   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Give answer here   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. Give answer here   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim in full (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down. state how many digits the account number has.. Give answer here   What is the total value of the claim? Give answer here   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Give answer here   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Give answer here   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Give answer here Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Give answer here   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Give answer here   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Give answer here   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Give answer here   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Give answer here   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Give answer here   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Give answer here   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Give answer here   Why did you cease payments? Give answer here   What was the date of your last payment? Give answer here   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Give answer here   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Give answer here   What you need to do now.   Answer the questions above   If you have not already done so – send a CCA request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement (If Applicable) (except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts)   Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts   Request 1 - Loans/Credit Cards     Request 2 - Current Accounts     You may use a CPR part 18 request for any other information (not request documents) that you might require in order to defend yourself. Please note that CPR 18 is specifically for Fast Track claims and although technically the claim has yet to be allocated to a track the claimant may refuse to comply for this reason.   If you require CPR Part 18 - this will need to be drafted specifically.   If you are not planning on defending for one reason or another – then you will need to complete an Income and Expenditure form and contact the Solicitor with your proposal. The N9a is already enclosed in the claim pack for Admittance which should be sent to the solicitor named on the claim form   If you are considering making a partial admittance N9b must be completed and returned to the court. Please note in most cases a partial admittance will result in an automatic CCJ for the amount admitted.   You have received a Claim - What you need to do.pdf1.33 MB · 242 downloads     Before Printing the PDF TIP   If you DO NOT wish to print Page 1 (Cover Page) of the PDF, please ensure to do the following:   Ensure you go to your Printer Settings and set it to 'Print from Page 2' (this way Page 1 (Cover Page) should not print out).   Note: This will save you Ink & Paper     Bookmark   Report 3 weeks later...   AndyOrch Posted March 20, 2014 #2   Once you receive a Court Summons N1   As a defendant in a small claims case it is important that you act quickly and do not ignore the claim form when it arrives. Remember, the claim will proceed anyway even if you don’t respond. If the claim goes against you, it will be very difficult to make a counter claim as you didn’t respond to the initial small claim.   You may be unaware that you are the defendant in a small claims case that a Creditor has bought against you. When the small claims form arrives follow these initial steps:   1: Read the Form Carefully   The detail about the claim that is being bought against you will be in the ‘particulars of claim’ section. If this section isn't completed, or has the words ‘particulars of claim to follow’ take no action now and wait until you are sent details of the claim against you. You may want to consult a lawyer at this stage.   2: Respond in Time   It’s vitally important that you respond to the claim for you have been sent. Remember that there is a 19 day (5 +14) time limit on this to acknowledge the claim.You must submit before the 19 days are up, so post your response with plenty of time.If your intention is to defend the claim in full you get a further 14 days to submit your response ...so 33 days in total.   3: Talk to the Claimant   Just because a small claim has been bought against you and a claim form issued, this doesn’t mean you are not allowed to contact the claimant directly. In fact the court encourages you to try and settle the claim without the need for a court appearance. So, try and resolve your dispute directly with the claimant if you can.   Not Responding to a Small Claim   If you ignore the small claims form when it arrives this can have an adverse impact on your financial status. The court will continue with the small claims lawsuit that is being bought against you even in your absence as this is a legal requirement. When the small claim is processed you will be sent a bill showing the amount you owe and any additional costs. The small claims against you is a legal process that will be recorded on the Register of Judgements, Orders and Fines. This information is used to check your credit, so could have a negative impact when you next apply for any credit. To avoid damaging your credit rating reply to your small claims docket as soon as you can.   How to Respond to Your Small Claims Form   When you received your form from the court you will also have been sent a response pack. In this pack you will see the option that are open to you. These include:   • A dispute claim form. You can use this form if you do not agree that you are liable for the small claim being bought against you and wish to submit a Defence. • Details about how to pay the amount being claimed from you. • Details about how to admit to part of the small claim against you, and how you can ask the claimant for more time to pay.   There are Two Types of Small Claims:   Fixed Amounts:   If the claim against you is for a fixed amount of money your response pack will contain three forms. Form N9 (acknowledgement of Service), form N9A (admission form) and N9B (defence and counterclaim form).   Unspecified Amounts:   If the amount being claimed is unspecified you will be sent forms N9 and N9C (admission form) and N9D (defence and counterclaim form). It is vital that you read the accompanying explanatory notes before choosing which form to send back.   Paying the Small Claim   If you want to make full payment of the amount being claimed against you this amount will be shown on the claim for you have been sent, and will also have details about where to send the money. Don’t forget, this must be done within the 14 day time limit or your case will proceed to the next stage.   In some instances you would like to pay, but need more time, you can give details about the delay you would like on form N9A, which should be in your response pack. It’s also a good idea to read leaflet EX309: The Defendant Admits by claim as this gives more details on this aspect of your case when fixed amounts of money are involved. Leaflet EX308 gives details of cases when unspecified amounts are being claimed against you.   Also please read forms EX326 and EX160A   How to Defend a Claim Against You   Disputed claims are handled by filling in the appropriate form from your response pack. You have three choices: Form N9, N9B or N9D. Read the note accompanying each form carefully to ensure you completely correctly. Pay special attention to the allegations raised on the form. If you don’t respond to each the court will assume you are admitting guilt. Edited April 10, 2014 by stu007 Updated PDF added    1   Bookmark   Report 2 months later...   citizenB   Posted June 5, 2014 #3   PLEASE NOTE - WARNING   Once you have received your claim form - the Court timetable comes into force. Not that of the creditor or claimant. If you have requested information with them after the claim has been issued - or have entered into discussion with them and they say something like "We will put this on hold for a period of time". You cannot and must not ignore the timetable from the court.   This thread should serve as an example   http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?416202&p=4547677#post4547677   The OP in the case above was in communication with the CAG Vodafone rep. A claim was issued during this time. The Rep in good faith said he would ask the Claimant to put things on hold.... they did not.. the OP ignored advice from caggers to continue with the court timetable and did not submit a defence. The claimaint obtained a Judgment by default. Edited June 5, 2014 by citizenB     Bookmark   Report 3 yr AndyOrch changed the title to You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do   style="text-align: center;">     Thread Locked because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days. If you need to add something to this thread then   Please click the "Report " link   at the bottom of one of the posts.   If you want to post a new story then Please Start your own new thread That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help    Thanks  This topic is now closed to further replies.  Share Follow3 Go to topic listing Next unread topic Recently Browsing   1 Cagger hugo1963 1,380 Members Viewed hugo1963 4 minutes ago   lolerz 4 hours ago   vicr76 8 hours ago   Moomoo11 Friday at 18:18   London1971 Friday at 11:26   AndyOrch Friday at 11:13   mollie5549 Thursday at 17:21   zyghom Thursday at 13:26   Magnusinfinity May 15   Newdogg06 May 14   Unique May 13   saberguy May 12   Mycathasfleas May 12   WantJustice May 9   Rain clouds May 8   MoltoModerato May 3   George2024 May 1   Badtimes123 April 30   LouLouDev79 April 29   northmonk April 29   mowbli April 29   WornOut55 April 27   paulhn757 April 24   UsedCarMan April 23   robertobaggio April 23   marksheff April 20   anotheruser0000 April 19   TT98 April 18   gatoradeqaz April 17   Murielme2 April 15   Frontera mixup April 11   BreadAndButter April 9   Karalius April 9   nurjeon03 April 9   Penglings April 8   Nick April 8   Edals April 5   thesixco April 1   lifttheveil March 30   dx100uk March 30   Stripeycat March 28   jon8214 March 27   sharkieuk March 25   HappyHolidays March 24   sandokan March 22   SimplyBeyondWords March 22   supernick90 March 20   iyam71 March 20   Nicky Boy March 18   StoryBoard March 18   Myth_007 March 15   kaze March 12   RodeMan March 8   eskimo123 March 7   JEDIKNIGHTS March 6   persha50 March 6   tobzas March 6   lancashirelad93 March 6   HappyDay2222 March 3   1penny March 3   nat8808 March 2   FTMDave March 1   lynzmeek February 25   Mike Mechanic February 25   Ethel Street February 24   Outoftoon February 23   anna may February 22   PJB5 February 22   iamgnome February 21   SweetCaroline February 20   EdinburghDude February 19   Grgw44 February 18   linbren03 February 15   whittymags February 9   flembo45 February 7   comebackjimmy February 6   MontyIsInnocent February 4   libra007 February 1   Eamonn77 January 31   xtonehari January 30   hlh49421 January 30   ceeferace January 29   catscratch January 29   Melbel January 25   Suggababe January 19   yorkshire_lufc January 17   ljrobinson69 January 16   makkyinuk January 15   yogii January 14   MadMat January 12   rocky_sharma January 4   mrskippy21 January 3   lookinforinfo December 29, 2023   europa16 December 28, 2023   MrsSl December 27, 2023   KP44UK December 23, 2023   Montego December 22, 2023   Worazz December 21, 2023   StopTheBullies December 21, 2023   hitman126 December 20, 2023   +1280 More   Have we helped you ...?                     Contact Us   Cookies Copyright Reclaim the Right Ltd - reg: 05783665Powered by Invision Community IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.  
    • ITV News have got hold of an email and recording of a phone call between Vennells and Ron Warmington of Second Sight. People in the know are saying it's smoking gun everyone's been looking for. I love that this has come out the day before she appears at the inquiry. This should be interesting under oath. Paula Vennells' 'smoking gun' email reveals Post Office 'cover-up' | ITV News WWW.ITV.COM ITV News has acquired an email and recording of a phone call that suggests the former Post Office boss was aware of issues with the Horizon system...  
    • I think you may as well take the opportunity in your letter to tell them that if they won't take responsibility for it then you will see quotations for the repair, provide copies of the quotations to them and then proceed with your own repair and recover the money back from them in the courts if necessary. Separately, can I ask you whether this is the car that you then bought unseen and at some distance from you? Has it come with an MOT and if so what date was the MOT and who gave it the MOT? Have you read our used car guide
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage Securitisation - Preferred


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Suetonius,

 

It's really very unimportant. Ergo shall we leave your ego out of it - I've said I concede that there may be something the lenders do with which you may not agree, I don't know what it is and quite frankly I don't really care. So I'm not taking time out to prove or disprove the point. It's far too irrelevant. Again, I've said it's good to find that there is ONE CAGger who is a happy consumer.....and that represents one small step of progress for the banking world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another poor six billion sods to go then! Counting...

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suetonius,

 

It's really very unimportant. Ergo shall we leave your ego out of it - I've said I concede that there may be something the lenders do with which you may not agree, I don't know what it is and quite frankly I don't really care. So I'm not taking time out to prove or disprove the point. It's far too irrelevant. Again, I've said it's good to find that there is ONE CAGger who is a happy consumer.....and that represents one small step of progress for the banking world.

 

What can I say.. You are very apt with the terminology that you use

 

However, despite what you may or not believe.. I am not interested in getting into a ****ing contest with you as that will achieve very little.

 

So shall we get back to the debate at hand ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lesson:

 

On my desk is a ping pong ball, half painted black the other half white...when I hold it up and ask another to tell me the colour of the ball they say Black cos that's all they see - from where I look it's white. Same ball different angle...come around my side you see what I see, just keep revolving you two...I don't see squabble or rights and wrongs trying to be proved here..all I see is what one party will be likely to get thrown at them by anyone who knows what they're talking about and there's not many others here with either the balls or knowledge to put these arguments and views forward..you couldn't get this kind of set-off if you paid for it so keep at it, There's nothing intellects like more than intelligent debate and that's what people like me are seeing. So keep it up, for once we are seeing and uncovering the wrinkles, each can take whatever route one wants and feels comfortable with but may I congratulate both of you for your contributions.

 

I know Seutonius is 100% a Cagger, so whatever he says I personally know it's for the common good, Supersleuth wouldn't be on here sharing this wonderful knowledge either if he/she wasn't also doing this for the common good -so, same ball...Well done to both, keep revolving...it's brilliant .

 

Thank you

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Buzz, JC & EIE,

 

I can Act like a Duck, but that doesn't make me a duck ( be fun though :p ) what I am getting at is splitting hairs here because I want to find the line between 'acting like the owner' and who the actual owner is, or as JC puts it " They can only refuse if it's reasonable to do so " and who decides if it's reasonable and what are the guidelines/rules?

 

Is it in a regulation somewhere that rather than just a courtesy the new loan provider, HAS to request PERMISSION to register the new charge from the current charge holders? and, if that permission is NOT obtained from the true owner as the mtg has been sold through securitisation, then would the new 2nd charge holder have recourse if their loan went belly up on the 'spoof' owner of the 1st mtg as they have been deceived?

 

If as SS says, the ownership has changed and the LReg not informed then that to me is deception..?

 

You may have, wittingly or unwittingly, added another string to the consumers bow - namely has any subsequent secured lender got permission to add their charge from the REAL owner & if not what are the consequences for that lender - unenforceable contract perhaps - poisoned at conception ???

 

Comments please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooh. I'm liking this!

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lesson:

 

On my desk is a ping pong ball, half painted black the other half white...when I hold it up and ask another to tell me the colour of the ball they say Black cos that's all they see - from where I look it's white. Same ball different angle...come around my side you see what I see, just keep revolving you two...I don't see squabble or rights and wrongs trying to be proved here..all I see is what one party will be likely to get thrown at them by anyone who knows what they're talking about and there's not many others here with either the balls or knowledge to put these arguments and views forward..you couldn't get this kind of set-off if you paid for it so keep at it, There's nothing intellects like more than intelligent debate and that's what people like me are seeing. So keep it up, for once we are seeing and uncovering the wrinkles, each can take whatever route one wants and feels comfortable with but may I congratulate both of you for your contributions.

 

I know Seutonius is 100% a Cagger, so whatever he says I personally know it's for the common good, Supersleuth wouldn't be on here sharing this wonderful knowledge either if he/she wasn't also doing this for the common good -so, same ball...Well done to both, keep revolving...it's brilliant .

 

Thank you

Sarah

 

Loving your work Sarah :cool:

 

However, I would get a refund for that ping pong ball lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may have, wittingly or unwittingly, added another string to the consumers bow - namely has any subsequent secured lender got permission to add their charge from the REAL owner & if not what are the consequences for that lender - unenforceable contract perhaps - poisoned at conception ???

 

Comments please

I think the merit of this new idea still depends on one's view of Securitisation itself. One may adopt the 'take it as seen' Suetonius view (sorry Sue but you've been branded :wink:) or the more purist Supersleuth-CarmelButler view (err looks you've been branded too Super8)) and this is what informs who the REAL lenders and charge owners are and who should have got permission from whom. The scenario you describe becomes interesting under the latter view.

 

Ultimately, it may be better to stick to the root of the debate rather than derivative outcomes of either approach. Subsequent lenders (or creditors for that matter) can still place a charge against your assets with or without permission from the existing lender(s) as long as the can prove to the LR that you owe them. These charges just don't have the same ease of implementation and legal strength. That's how unsecured debts are converted into charging orders on a property after a judgement for the debt has been obtained by the plaintiff lender.

 

For what it's worth:grin:

Edited by bustthematrix
What????????
  • Haha 1

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Far from my bubble being burst, it does not even have a puncture and still airtight ;-)

 

Only as long as you're financially nimble and mortgageable and BBR remains deliciously low. If BBR starts to head North rapidly, you won't be sitting so pretty.:-D

 

Don't mean to 'burst' your bubble sir, just some perspective!!!8)

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interest rates are absolutely guaranteed to head north, and probably big style.

 

It's the only way to pay for this Sh1T.

 

If I were David Cameron I'd Shi**ing myself at actually winning the next election!

 

DISCLAIMER* I HAVE NO POLITICAL AXES TO GRIND.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Suetonius,

 

That's a point...if s.136 applies...maybe it does, may be it doesn't. Do you know if there is any legal authority on the point?

 

Supersleuth

 

I didn't but I do now. Contrary to my initial investigations, it would appear that s.136 does apply.

 

The Financial Collateral Arrangements (No.2) Regulations 2003

 

 

PART 2

 

Modification of law requiring formalities

 

Certain legislation requiring formalities not to apply to financial collateral arrangements

 

"(3) Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (legal assignments of things in action) shall not apply (if it would otherwise do so) in relation to a financial collateral arrangement, to the extent that the section requires an assignment to be signed by the assignor or a person authorised on its behalf, in order to be effectual in law."

 

 

So it would appear that that the assignment does not need to be signed by the assignor. However, the requirement for "express notice in writing has been given to the debtor" is still a requirement.

 

If this requirement is not met the assignment can only be equitable.

 

Therefore, the right to commence legal proceedings remains with the original mortgage lender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only as long as you're financially nimble and mortgageable and BBR remains deliciously low. If BBR starts to head North rapidly, you won't be sitting so pretty.:-D

 

Don't mean to 'burst' your bubble sir, just some perspective!!!8)

 

Lol, I hear you

 

But given the fixed rates etc currently avaliable in the market, I am ok for the immediate future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Suetonius,

 

You currently have the luxury of LOL and you're OK jack, but have you read what's happening to Littledotty27 recently? Proud of your lenders are you? Have you read the carnage they are causing to many good and hardworking families - but no worries, Suetonius cos you're (currently) an OK jack. Tell Littledotty27 that according to the law of Suetonius she's got no chance. Don't want a row Suetonius, but I am beginning to wonder if you have any compasion for others at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Suetonius,

 

You currently have the luxury of LOL and you're OK jack, but have you read what's happening to Littledotty27 recently? Proud of your lenders are you? Have you read the carnage they are causing to many good and hardworking families - but no worries, Suetonius cos you're (currently) an OK jack. Tell Littledotty27 that according to the law of Suetonius she's got no chance. Don't want a row Suetonius, but I am beginning to wonder if you have any compasion for others at all.

 

 

Ok lets get this straight once and for SS.

 

It has nothing to do with me being an ok Jack. It has to do with just one thing and one thing only. I do not agree with you.

 

1) You do not know me:rolleyes:

2) You do not know anything about my personal financial situation.:rolleyes:

3) You are making assumptions about me, without any knowledge of the facts.:rolleyes:

 

 

I would ask you respectfully, not to take my posts as personal. I disagree with you, it is that simple.

 

I can assure you that no offence is intended and I apologise if it has been taken.

 

You say you don't want a row... You do give the distinct impression that you would like one !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good God Peeps

 

I suggest a moratorium. Agree not to post either directly or indirectly with reference to each other for at least 48 hours. Please?

 

Keep the faith. EIE. Cheers.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suetonius,

 

It is not necessary to agree with people in order to be civil. Also I do not take your posts personally. We can gracefully agree to disagree. You are entitled to your opinions as are others.

 

With sincere regards

Supersleuth

Link to post
Share on other sites

sue with regards to your interest rate it exactly illustrates my point you would be much worse off were you to re-mortgage at this time.

Now people with a spml/ge money etc mortgage are finding the same to be the case. Remember these are somewhat more adverse than you are lucky enough to have. The eurosail prospectus I am using has a stabilized interest rate after the end of fixed/discount rates end of 3.15% above libor.

Now to use a libor rate from july 2007 that would mean the average customer paying an interest rate of above 9% pretty much untenable for most people to sustain I would have thought. Hence the need to re-mortgage, sell etc

This is/was the business model employed that the mortgage would be redeemed on or around the end of the fixed/discount rate ended.

Now consider the same average customer they would be paying an interest rate of 4.815% which is likely to be around the original fixed rate the customer was paying hence no desire or need to re-mortgage spv business model out of the window.

Now you also ask the valid question why haven't you been tricked/forced etc into arrears. Well I would say it stands to reason to target the most adverse customers first as they are already paying the most and of course any fees/costs/arrears you can bang on also attract interest at the same high rate. You would also want to factor in the original ltv. Then throw in for good measure the fact that capstone does an experian credit check monthly (common practice in the usa but I aren't even sure of its legality here).

 


Link to post
Share on other sites

HI - SS - tracking back thru the thread we had a chat about my lender Oakwood Homeloans and their attempted repossession - the hearing in Feb this year saw them get the suspended repo and order to pay the instalment plus £50. I said I would pay exactly that then and not a penny more.

Thus, today, I have had an arrogant speed speaking man on the phone from Oakwood telling me that we are in default because we are not paying a further £50 arrears charges. Also, when asked about the solicitors costs and why they had been added to the account last Sept, he said that they were entitled to put the costs on whenever they liked as that is when they had incurred the cost!? I've asked him to send me the bill but since they have still not fully complied with my DSAR I doubt they will oblige. He did say the call was being recorded and I said good. I am so cross with this company, I hope that the media people take this case up soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Transactions such as this demonstrate our continuing commitment to providing the whole loan market with sufficient volumes of collateral to further enhance the availability of new sources of funding and liquidity to our mortgage market.”

 

Ooops. Didn't quite work out like that though did it? Idiots. Greedy idle idiots.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

This could interest you Campari, I think this might also be of some relence to the ongoing securitisation debate.

 

Oakwood apes edeus' golden goodbye - 18 August 2008

 

 

The broker-introduced mortgages Oakwood is trying to offload stem from investments made by Credit Suisse.

 

 

It is understood that Credit Suisse bought buy-to-let assets from GMAC-RFC, Kensington and edeus and placed them in Oakwood. It has taken the decision to encourage borrowers to redeem their mortgages early or refinance with other lenders rather than sell the assets at a loss.

As a result, Oakwood has written to 250 borrowers offering to waive 15% of their outstanding mortgage balance if they choose to take their mortgages to other lenders before their fixed rate terms expire.

 

 

The amount waived will be calculated from the date the letters were sent. Oakwood will also waive early repayment charges and its £120 exit fee.

Oakwood is serviced by Homeloan Management, part of the Skipton group. In its letter to borrowers, Oakwood recommends they contact Pink Home Loans, also part of Skipton, to source alternative deals. Pink was unavailable for comment.

 

 

Oakwood is using specialist servicer Engage Credit to notify clients.

Jason Miller, chief executive of Engage Credit, says: "At the direction of Oakwood Homeloans, Engage Credit has deployed a strategy to target selected borrowers which will allow them to redeem their outstanding mortgage balances at a discount.

 

 

 

"This strategy will allow Oakwood to deleverage its exposure to the housing market while giving selected borrowers incentives to refinance."

Credit Suisse's decision to offload assets in this way follows a £5.6m fine from the Financial Services Authority for failures to conduct its business with due care and diligence and for failing to organise itself effectively.

Credit Suisse declined to comment

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...