Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • [URL=https://meettomy.site]Pretty Girls in your town[/URL]
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard CCA - Odd phone conversation


Misscynical
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Had another 'chasing payment' call from Barclaycard yesterday which I decided to answer as I'd send just sent them a reminder asking for a response to CCA request. Whilst talking to the chap he told me that I'd only get a copy of my Application for the card which I signed in 1991. He said that the prescribed terms were on the application. I mentioned that I didn't think an application form was enforceable and that unless they could produce an Agreement then surely they couldn't enforce the debt. He agreed that this was true but then said they would send it to a debt collection agency. I said that I didn't think this was allowed as the account was now in dispute. He also said that you only get an Agreement if the debt is secured.

 

He said I could reclaim any charges over and above £12 since 1991. I also have another card opened in 2006, again with no Agreement. He agreed that I should SAR both accounts and that if I put both account numbers on the form I could get all the information for a tenner.

 

I asked if any the credit reference markers were being added regarding my account and he said they were. I pointed out that as the account was in dispute this shouldn't be happening but he he said that they were sent each month automatically and couldn't be stopped. Is this true??

 

He confirmed that the conversation was being recorded so it sounds like that I can reclaim charges and not make any more payments as there's no action they can take. This is ok but it means that there is no real conclusion and this will follow me to my grave with the credit reference agencies.

 

Anyone have any ideas on what I should do now?

 

I will send a SAR so that I can reclaim the charges but what would be the next steps??

 

Thanks to all you knowledgeable bods on the site:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

I hope when you SAR them you make sure they include that recording. The transcript would be fascinating.

 

Agreement only on secured debt?? Utter tosh (politely put)

 

With your SAr letter I'd put in the A/C in dispute letter and the telephone harassment letter too. That should annoy them.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fox

 

Made me laugh and I was gobsmacked when I came off the phone. If I get a copy of the recording I'll post it and if its on CD I'll wack the whole thing out and post it up for all to see... however long it takes. If I don't get a copy I'll kick up a real stink! I sent the dispute letter on Monday and will do the SAR over the weekend. Will have a look for the harassment letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is it:

 

Your Street

Town

City

Postcode

DATE HERE

Company Name

Road

Town

City / County

Postcode

 

 

Dear Sirs

Harassment by telephone

 

Account Number: XXXXXXX

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

[NAME HERE]

 

 

 

edit to suit.

 

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing please... are there any letters I can use for reclaiming the charges on a credit card and can I use the banking reclaim spreadsheet including 8% interest on the charges? I feel the 8% isn't much compared to what Barclaycard charges.:mad:

You can reclaim the FULL amount of any penalty they've charged you, not just the excess over £12.

 

You can use the site spreadsheets. There are 2 for credit cards here - Simple and Advanced - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-6-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

 

If you just want the penalty chgs back, BC will repay them with little trouble. If you want to reclaim the interest as well, BC will oppose you all the way to court, but the rewards are high.

 

I see Noomill has subscribed to your thread - you'll get good interest advice there.

 

If you want to know more about claiming the higher interest, read here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/145027-interest-tutorial.html :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply slick. I've had a look at the interest and the higher one is indeed baffling so will definitely need all the help I can get!!:eek: As I opened my account in 1991 could I claim for charges since then (supposing that they send me all my statements under the SAR)? Once everything gets under way I'll probably have about 15 claims/disputes on the go so will look at the work involved as my new full-time job:) Along with my Lloyds credit card, this Barclaycard is one of my oldest so it's definitely worth me going for all charges and higher rate of interest. Many thanks. MissC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MissC,

 

Not sure if you know, but going back beyond the normal 6 years means you will also have to argue why your case includes claims beyond the normal time limits.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31575-important-things-you-really.html?garpg=6

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/statutes-library/415-limitation-act-1980-a.html

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, ok slick. Not sure what to do now:confused: I read the first link on time limitations but too much to take in regarding the second link, I think. Am I understanding that it would it be better to go for the last six years rather than back to 1991 as I wouldn't stand much chance of success?

 

"If you would like to try and claim your charges as far back as you have ever paid them, you should try to do so.

 

However, do note that you will only be able to rely directly on the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regs.1999 if your bank contract was entered into post 1995"

 

As my account was opened in 1991 would the above paragraph mean that I can't go back to that date?

 

Not even reached first hurdle and confused already

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as a start... does anyone know where I can find the credit card Subject Access Request to send to Barclays please? Have had a scout around but...

 

Also I have a spreadbet debt which gained me a CCJ by default and the Claimaint's refused to send me any info under CPR 18. If anyone could tell me where to find a SAR that's not for credit cards or banks, I'd be grateful. Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, ok slick. Not sure what to do now:confused: I read the first link on time limitations but too much to take in regarding the second link, I think. Am I understanding that it would it be better to go for the last six years rather than back to 1991 as I wouldn't stand much chance of success?

The relevant part of the Limitations Act is s.32. However, if you're feeling overloaded already, this may make it simpler.

 

BC started charging penalties in the late 90's and, even then, quite inconsistently. They stopped for a while and then started charging again for every occasion. So, even if you only claim for the last 6 years, you are unlikely to be missing out that many charges.

 

I'm not saying you wouldn't succeed if you go back beyond 6 years but you may need to argue your case in court, so would need a reasonable understanding of the relevance of s.32 Limitations Act 1980.

 

You may well have trouble getting state's from BC older than 6 years as they seem to be making it harder to get the normal 6 years data recently.

 

Use the standard SAR - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

 

But use this for your Prelim Letter - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/586-credit-store-card-letter.html

 

You need to decide if you want to claim the higher interest before you send off the Prelim Letter. Read up on this while awaiting BC's reply to your SAR. Steven's Interest Tutorial is a good starting point.

 

I see you're getting advice on the SpreadBet issue on your other thread so I won't confuse this thread (or me) by dealing with it here.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks slick. Subject Access Request ready to go in post tomorrow for both accounts.

 

When I CCA'd them I sent a letter for each account and seperate postal orders for a £1 each. Despite it saying they should only use this for the fee, they've obviously used one £1 postal order for both requests and credited the other £1 postal order as a payment to one of the accounts as I can see it on my statement. Is it worth writing to them about this or is it not worth it/being nit-pickie??

 

After the above phone call from them they have now sent me a copy of the 'Barclaycard Conditions'. These are recent though so shall I just ignore them as they haven't complied to the CCA request?

 

After reading your post above I'll see what turns up in Subject Access Request as to how long I go back but may stick to the 6 years. I've also added a bit to the Subject Access Request letter, in case it didn't include it as was, asking for copies of all telephone transcriptions so that silverfox can see what was said exactly in the phone conversation at the top of the thread.

 

Cheers, MissC

 

PS Regarding spreadbet thread, I've opened another one linked to this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/165310-spreadbet-debt-various-credit.html as I don't seem to be getting far with the points I really need advice on. If you are able to give any advice over on either threads I'd really appreciate it as this is my most pressing on at the mo and probably why I was feeling a tad overloaded the over day Thanks again.

Edited by slick132
put correct link in to other thread
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MissC,

 

You can send one SAR quoting both a/c nos. with £10 and should get back the data for both card a/c's.

 

If you've made recent pay'ts to the a/c's, them crediting the £1 CCA request pay'ts is of little consequence. It WOULD be significant if you'd paid nothing to the a/c's in years, as this would STOP the debts becoming Statute Barred.

 

You should watch, however, that they recognise that you paid for the CCA requests and supply the required info.

 

I'll look at the other thread and add anything if I can. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Well, SAR request back both accounts, no copies of notes, phone calls, no agreement. And statements only going back to 2003 not the inception of the account in 1991. Got a text this morning from Barclaycard saying my case was now being handled by Mercers.

 

Not sure that I care any more. Took a massive file of paperwork from the 15+ claims I was tackling re dodgy agreements and charges as solicitor has said that the only way to avoid the Final Charging Order going on my house is to go bankrupt. So... there I go.

 

Big thanks to all those who people who came forth with their helpful replies. Sorry I couldn't battle on and put it all to good use. Only wish the Official Receiver would let me carry on with my grim determination to fight the lot but I don't think I'd be allowed. Best of luck to everyone, MissCxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Miss C,

 

If you want further advice, regarding the Bankruptcy route, or your situation generally, you can always post here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/formal-solutions-bankruptcy-administration/

 

Or in any of the other Debt forums. Good luck in any event.........:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...