Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

James Villas - Dogs n All


Oiler
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5551 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks,

I'm new to the forum and this is my first posting.

Regarding James Villa's (a reputable company so I thought)

To keep this as short as I can, I will fill in the finer details as we go.

We booked a villa in Cyprus, very nice is was too. After attempting to get a good nights sleep on the evening of our arrival, we were disturbed by dogs barking, not just a couple of dogs but a pack. They started around 9.30 in the evening and did not stop until early hours around 3am the next morning.

As we thought that this was a one off we did nothing about it. Then yes you've guessed it it all started again that evening. These dogs were in what looked like a corrogated iron clad hut in the next villa around a 100 metres away.

We contacted our rep and complained, she was very prompt in comming to visit. She said that she would talk to her office and that they would attempt to contact the owner of our villa, who would in turn speak to the neighbours with the dogs. The rep also told us that she had a complaint from the previous tennants on the last day of their holiday!

the next evening & the evening after that were exactly the same. now if it were the case of dogs barking during the day, that would be bad enough but we were unable to get to sleep until the early hours every night. we were getting up around midday to one o-clock, half of the day had gone, we could not get to see all the things we had planned in cyprus.

 

we called in the rep again, played her the extreme noise that thee dogs were making, barking & yelping relentlessly. (We also noticed on our way out that evening, a wheel cover on a 4x4 vehicle with the words DOG FARM.) She said that she could move us in a couple of days. This she did, so on top of the upheaval of moving villas we only had a few day left of our eleven day break to recover from next to no sleep for the majority of the holiday.

So all in all, what with our original flights booked with XL, and an extremely dissapointing break, we wrote to James Villas asking for compensation, who replied and basically said that it was beyond their controll & offered my a £100.00 vouchure to use again with James Villas!

I replied to their letter, showing my dissatisfaction, they in return replied back saying that this would be their final response and that if I wanted to take it further, I should contact ABTA. Oh, and that the £100.00 vouchure was still available!!!!!

My argument to them was that whether or not it was beyond their controll, they had a duty of responsibility to supply a villa that was fit for purpose, as far as I am concerned this villa was Not fit to let for holidays.

Any suggestions please.

Edited by Oiler
Missed info out
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Oiler,

 

I live in Cyprus and in many areas, noise from barking dogs is the norm. The Cypriots keep these dogs for hunting and are often housed in kennels or sheds outside.

I have recently moved from a house where my neighbours dogs barked continously so you have my sympathy.

 

It's quite bizarre that a company like James would have a villa so close to an obvious noise nuisance but it is possible they have covered themselves in the holiday info on their website where it states that the villas are often in residential areas and also that local dogs and cats may cause disturbance.

 

I work for a tour operator (not James!) and I think they will stick to the 'beyond their control' line and they are hoping that you will just get fed up and go away. If you want to take it further you will have to keep at them and perhaps should take advice from ABTA or a specialist travel lawyer.

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You.

It looks like Money claim online is the way to go.

Does anyone know the best proceedure for using this service & as to what text will get the best results?

 

Thank You again:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You.

It looks like Money claim online is the way to go.

Does anyone know the best proceedure for using this service & as to what text will get the best results?

 

Thank You again:)

 

Claim the full amount of the holiday, use the words 'no fit for purpose' and 'miss-sold' and just state your case. They wont go to court and should make you an offer of around 50 to 90% to settle out of court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never had any dealings with ABTA. I have heard good and bad about them.

 

I myself had cause to complain about a terrible holiday about 5 years ago with Thomas Cook. It took me 18 months to get the compensation I thought was right. I didn't use ABTA, just my own determination and bloody mindedness!

 

It can be done so just stick at it and good luck.

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

Having the same problem with James Villas over a Villa we booked in Tuscany.

See James Villas - Review - Il Bagnese - James Villas

 

Rented "Il Bagnese" in Italy via James Villas a "best of" villa. We walked out within 1 hour of arrival. The place was filthy!!! Mould on toilet seat, shower broken mould on curtains and around base, drawer units falling to pieces, **** line around swimming pool, microwave on top of fridge freezer, kitchen non-existant, etc....

Passports, we were asked to enter our full passport details onto forms in a file that was left on the sideboard, this file contained details of all previous guests and would prove to be very useful for identity fraud!!!

Have used them before and been very happy but when faced with a problem they did not want to know!!!!

This Villa does not reach the standard of the other 'Best of' Villas that we have rented.

With their attitude I will never be using them again.

Copies of letters and photographs in support of my complaint are available.

They have told me to take them to arbitration!! I have appointed a solicitor.

They just do not seem to care. I used to think having taken a number of holidays with them that they were a good company not anymore.

Il Bagnese, Alberoro in Tuscany - sold by James Villas

UPDATE 24/11/2008.

After an initial insulting offer for full settlement of £87.71p my solicitor sent a 7 days notice letter, on the last day a letter was received increasing the settlement offer to £325.43p. I have rejected this offer and given my solicitior instructions to proceed with court action.

Summary: Stay away from both Villa and Company.

 

Please keep me informed of your situation and will keep me posting updated as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent then a notice before action letter and here is their reply.

 

Thank you for your correspondence dated 19th Dec, which I have recieved today. Further to advising us of your intensions to claim costs limited to "2718 through the small claims court, I have spoken to our solicitors for legal advice. It is the case that we do not consider a refund of all monies paid to James Villas, including credit card charges, and a refund of airfares booked and paid for through a seperate supplier reasonable for the issues relating to dogs residing within the grounds of a neighbouring property.

I would again reiterate that no complaint concerning disruption experiencee by guests both prior to and following your stay at Villa Pelagia has been received in this office, and subsequently it was considered previously to withdraw this property from our programme. Nevertheless, upon reporting your concerns to our resort staff during your stay, endeavours were made to reduce any disruption, and alternative accommodation was also offered and accepted.

In conclusion therefore, I do not feel this is an instance where financial compensation can be considered. In accordance with our booking conditions, if we are unable to reach an amicable resolution in respect of a customer complaint, our recommendation os for the customer to contact ABTA who provide an un-biased, low cost, independant arbitration service through The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. Details of such a scheme can be found etc. Of course it is your choice as to which method of resolution you wish to follow and should you decide to proceed through the small claims court or an alternative avenue of resolution, I shall await their instruction and corrispond with them directly.

 

What do you think of that????:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Oiler,

Final paragraph a straight copy of the one they sent me and the opening paragraph follows the same lines stating they are are not responsible!!!

If you have a fax number I am willing to send you copies of the correspondence that has taken place.

I will keep the site updated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Mark1959,

Many thanks for that info. My fax number is: 0871 251 8630, it will be very interesting to see their letter.

Likewise, I will keep the forum updated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All recieved fine thank you, no need for photos.

I see what you mean regarding their standard replies. I am about to start the moneyclaim online, I'm not sure if I should include the airfares as stated in my letter to them.

One line of their letter to me makes me think that they have some concerns regarding my claim. The line being = Further to advising us of your intensions to claim costs limited to "2718 through the small claims court, I have spoken to our solicitors for legal advice.

I wonder why have have included the word limited? Are they worried that this could escalate. Apart from the fact that it will be me who decides if I wish to limit my claim or not!

Mark, have you a fax number, or shall I email my correspondence to you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, fax number is on my letter heading, xxxx xx xx xx xx. I am limiting my claim to the cost of the Villa only, and the additional costs surrounding the disapointement etc.. This is the element they supplied via their brochure/web site, a third party deals with the airfares etc...

Edited by mark1959
removing phone number
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

To follow up, I have now issued a Money Claim Online summons, James Villas now take it upon themselves to actually get interested in my claim.

They now want to see my taped evedence, supposedly to show their indemnity insurers. I am loathed to do this, as they were not interested at all before I sent the claim. Also, why should I pre arm them.

 

Also, they have logged an aknowledgment to the court (online) ticking the box that says that they will defend the whole claim?

 

Any ideas anybody please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Supply the information requested by return, show them you are serious and not afraid.

I am still awaiting their response but on one of the other web-sites I have posted on somebody else has conformed they stayed at the same Villa and that it was terrible!!

I will keep you updated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Word of warning guys - do not publish your email addresses or fax numbers on here. All sorts of poeple look in on the forum & at best, you may be bombarded with junk & at worst, your details could be used to obtain info. about you.

 

Edit them out of your posts or click the red triangle at the bottom left of the posts & ask a mod. to do it for you.

 

If you want to pass on personal info. to other members, it's safer to use the PM system (in your User CP).

 

BTW, I've tackled holiday companies in the past - in my experience they will not give in without court action. Writing to them is a waste of time. My rule - one letter of complaint, detailing what you want in compensation, one LBA & then an N1. You sometimes have to go to a hearing but I've never known them turn up so you get your judgment. That doesn't always mean you get your money though, it then takes a Warrant of Execution to make them pay up. Long process but stick at it, you'll get there. :)

 

Never use a holiday company nowadays, it's so easy on the internet to make any bookings you need & if things go wrong (which in real life, they can) you are in control & can decide on the spot what action to take to make the holiday as you expected.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

UPDATE 20/03/2009

Today received cheque for £800.00p and voucher for £100.00, total £900.00 in full and final settlement. Settlement reached the day prior to court proceedings being commenced when I noticed Il Bagnese had been withdrawn from the James Villa Brochure and I asked if due to these circumstances they were now prepared to make a sensible offer.:):):)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...