Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

bank court claim - offer full & final?


cbrman599
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

I have received a claim from a bank, I joined a company in 2004, with the promise of directorship & shares from the MD - to cut a long story short I signed a personal guarantee (whilst still an employee & no shareholding) for the bank to give the company an overdraft of 40k.

 

I left eventually as I didnt get what i was promised, the bank have now issued a claim against me for over 50k.

 

Should i offer a full and final settlement - I have around 10k that I could give them but that all i can muster.

 

I live with my partner & children, she owns the house - mortgage & deeds arein her name only.

 

There is around 30k equity in the house.

 

I now have my own business but dont take a huge wage from it.

 

How reasonable do you think the offer would be? What are the chances of the bank bankrupting me?

 

I have 28 days to file a defence.

 

thanks

 

cbr

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you signed guarantor for OD of 40k how are you liable for 50k? did the company increase the overdraft after you left and in doing so did they invalidate your guarantee?

 

I would ask for copies of all paperwork relating to this account at first.

 

making a 10k offer immediatly I feel would be a bad move as an opening one - They will immediately assume that you can afford more and push you to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the bank make you take independent legal advice before you entered into the guarantee?

 

Just because you signed a contract doesn't mean its binding.

 

A contract (such as a personal guarantee) has to have "Consideration". Read the following link carefully

 

Consideration under English law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Given your explanation of the circumstances in which the guarantee was entered into I can't see what the "consideration" would be. I have been on the opposite side of this argument from some one who pledged a personal guarantee to me in relation to business debts.

 

I would get some professional legal advice with the first £1k of the £10k you have at hand, but that is my personal opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, thanks for the quick responses.

 

the additional sums are interest & costs so far.

 

I have copies of the signed guarantee from the banks solicitors - I have been to see a solicitor, he feels I have maybe a 10-20% chance of defending the claim. He said that whilst 'unusual' for an employe to commit to guaranteeing his employers overdraft - it can happen.

 

I had advice given to me by a solicitor appointed & paid for by the MD of the company, it was all over rather quickly, with the added pressure to me of the MD sitting in on the signing with me.

 

I was taken advantage of but dont really know what to expect next?

 

I havent been in this position before & am extremely worried by it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that you may have a defence on 3 points.

 

1 lack of consideration - You actually got nothing in return for taking on this debt so the contract may be invalid.

2 Duress - you were "encouraged" into signing for this by your employer who sat and ensured that you signed it

3 you had no opportunity to get INDEPENDANT legal advice - the person who gave advice was paid for and acting on behalf of the MD of the company

 

Is your solicitor a "GP" type solicitor or is he an expert in company/contract law. if not, it might pay you to employ a solicitor who is...

Link to post
Share on other sites

how likely is it that the banks bankrupt people rather than accepting settlements?

 

Is it straightforward for them to get a charge on my 'beneficial interest' in the family home?

 

I am trying to see a worst case scenario here, at the moment I feel as though i'm sinking fast

Link to post
Share on other sites

Return the acknowledgment of service.

 

See a good solicitor. Get a defence in.

 

It will be a year or more in coming to court.

 

There will be plenty of time to discuss settlement with the other side. I wouldn't be making any offers to early, if it was me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks everyone,

 

on the face of it, the bank has a guarantee signed by me, but obviously I think there are a few 'tiny' grey areas.

 

How diligent should the bank have been in confirming with ME that I wasnt a director or shareholder at the time of signing?

 

They must have requested some info from the MD as a couple of weeks before the signing he sent them a letter stating I had 40%!!

 

I only found this out a couple of weeks ago when the banks solicitors sent me a copy - I have never had shares and this is confirmed by all documents registered with companies house. The banks solicitors also claimed I was a director at the time of signing, however, it was a couple of months after the signing that the MD finally gave me the form to complete, so it was impossible for them to have had any factual proof at that time.

 

I feel as though the bank should have confirmed my status with ME rather than relying on info that quite frankly could have said anything.

 

what do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks

 

does anyone have any info on what checks a bank should make when asking for guarantees from an employee of a company - should they check to see if they have a shareholding and or directorship, whom should these checks be made with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

well, just an update for everyone - I offered 20% of the debt as full and final to the bank, after having given them my income expenditure details as requested, they have now applied for 'summary judgement' - how likely is it that this will happen in their favour?

 

I have around £150 per month disposable income so thought the lump sumoffer would seem attractive to them - what will they gain if successful? I havent any assetts to speak of.

 

Any info would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank obviously feel that you have no real prospect of a defence. You should be careful here, even if they are unsuccessful in the claim for summary judgement, the Judge may look at costs and order that they are awarded "in the case". That will mean that if you loose the case at trial, you wiill also end up paying the costs of their failed summary judgement application.

 

Do you not have a solicitor acting for you?

 

Dangermouse

Link to post
Share on other sites

They must have requested some info from the MD as a couple of weeks before the signing he sent them a letter stating I had 40%!!

 

I only found this out a couple of weeks ago when the banks solicitors sent me a copy - I have never had shares and this is confirmed by all documents registered with companies house. The banks solicitors also claimed I was a director at the time of signing, however, it was a couple of months after the signing that the MD finally gave me the form to complete, so it was impossible for them to have had any factual proof at that time.

This could be the key! Where is the MD now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the replies -I do have a solicitor acting for me. He thinks a better angle for us is to make a claim against the banks solicitors for not giving true indpendent advice etc for the signing.

 

The MD set up another company late last year, I dont know his financial status or anything though.

 

Why do you ask?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The MD induced the situation and then dropped you right in it!....

 

".....as a couple of weeks before the signing he sent them a letter stating I had 40%!!"

 

If you had no part in that lie then the MD conspired with others to deceive the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...