Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Before you start this claim you need to have a lot more confidence in what you're doing which means that you need to understand the way forward in the principles involved more thoroughly. We will help you and you will probably get your money back but this is a self empowerment forum and so you have to do your bit as well. Please will you spend at least the next couple of days reading through the stories on this sub- forum. Try to understand them thoroughly. We have lots of stories very similar to yours but even those which are not similar, have principles in them which apply. In particular you need to read and understand the information in the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum. I know that you have been reading around here for the past couple of hours but it needs a lot more. You aren't in a huge hurry. Wait a few days before sending a letter of claim and also that needs some amendment as well. Come back here when you've done your reading and then we will have a look at your letter of claim and help you to refine it Also, please tell us the value of the laptop. Was it properly declared as a laptop – and was the value properly declared
    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Regular savings accounts are accounts designed for savers who put money aside every month and reward them with a generous interest rate.View the full article
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Weightmans want me to consent to a charge!


bladeboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5660 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a letter from Weightmans today virtually bullying me into accepting a voluntary charge on my property. Along the lines of 'accept it because we'll get on anyway'. Have already CCA'd them and unfortunately they have provided a seemingly valid agreement so I was getting round to offering pro-rata payment in any case.

 

They also threaten all sorts and from the tone of the letter it seems as though they think the Red Sea will part for them in any proceedings they choose to undertake.

 

Will upload the letters here. Any thoughts on a response anyone?

 

Also attached is a financial questonnaire. To me, it appears to be massively intrusive and I don't think they're entitled to most of the information.

 

With regards to both of the above, is it a case of them 'trying it on?'

 

weightcag1.gif

 

weightcag2.gif

 

weightfin1.gif

 

weightfin2.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them to go charge themselves.

 

If they were that certain of getting the charge then they would have gone ahead and done it already

 

can you post the CCA so we can get it checked (unless you are certain it is complient)

 

are the debts yours or joint?

 

If they are yours then your partners details are none of their business.

 

In a Income Expenditure form I would simply list money in and money out.

 

The rest of the details are none of their business.

 

This is only my opinion and I have been wrong before so wait for another opinion before acting on anythin I have said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Voluntary charge- err I don't think so.:eek: They would have to take you to court first to get a CCJ. You would then need to default on the CCJ before they could apply for a charging order- why make it easy for them? They certainly don't make your life easy so say thanks but no thanks for the offer or if you are feeling brave- Blow it out of your ar*se:D

<<<If I have helped please tickle the scales;-)<<<

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankruptcy is an empty threat in most cases - if you go bankrupt most creditors end up having to accept much less in settlement than they would get if you pay them.

 

I personally have negotiated more favourable deals with creditors using what my friend calles the blazing saddles defence (you may remember the black sherrif holding a gun to his own head and saying anyone comes near and Ill shoot)

 

Im sure there will be cases where they WILL enforce bankruptcy but my personal opinion is that they threaten it far more than it would ever be enforced by the courts and they actually want it far less than that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, went to see an insovency solicitor who explained that BK would be the best option for me.

 

The property is in roughly minus 10 grand negative equity and falling fast. I have no other assets to speak of. Car is on finance and owe more than it's worth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its hard graft fighting these bs sometimes but they can be beat,the letter i got scared me very much but after reading here i am chilled .

Do as flying says and post the CCa it might not be complient,worth a try

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you really think bankruptcy is the only way out BB, then I would write to Weightmans refusing to accept a voluntary charge, but state that you would welcome the opportunity for them to make you bankrupt, before doing this give the national debtline a call - National Debtline – Free, Confidential Debt Advice – Call 0808 808 4000 it is free and their advice is impartial......, BR really must be a last resort, and it should never be forced on anyone.

 

Write

 

Dear sirs/madam

 

Many thanks for your letter dated XXXXXX the contents of which have been noted, I will refuse a voluntary charge at this stage.

 

 

Have you any excessive charges ?

Are the defaults compliant ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The property is in roughly minus 10 grand negative equity and falling fast. I have no other assets to speak of. Car is on finance and owe more than it's worth.

 

In which case a voluntary charge or even a charging order would be meaningless.

My personal approach (but I don't like Weightmans very much) would be to let them spend as much money as possible on court fees, etc. and then go bankrupt. But you have to be very sure you are going to go bankrupt.

 

In any case a voluntary charging order is replacing an unsecured high-interest debt with a secured high-interest debt. If they want to secure the loan against your property get a binding commitment from them that all interest charges will cease.

 

If you go the other route of letting them claim in the County Court ensure you submit your income and expenditure and make a proposal for regular repayments at a level you can afford. If this is included in the judgment and (important) you keep making the repayments then you won't have to worry about a charging order. But all this is some way off yet.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case a voluntary charge or even a charging order would be meaningless.

My personal approach (but I don't like Weightmans very much) would be to let them spend as much money as possible on court fees, etc. and then go bankrupt. But you have to be very sure you are going to go bankrupt.

 

In any case a voluntary charging order is replacing an unsecured high-interest debt with a secured high-interest debt. If they want to secure the loan against your property get a binding commitment from them that all interest charges will cease.

 

If you go the other route of letting them claim in the County Court ensure you submit your income and expenditure and make a proposal for regular repayments at a level you can afford. If this is included in the judgment and (important) you keep making the repayments then you won't have to worry about a charging order. But all this is some way off yet.

 

 

A word of caution If the court procedure has started forr the charging order before you go BR then it may still grt pushed through, thus securing a debt that should be in the BR against the property.

 

This is obviously wrong, but i know two people it has happened too, and there faceing a brick wall with both the IS and the courts to get it overturned, so best not to let it get that far in the first place IMHO

 

Let them issue the court summons by all means but go Bankrupt before the hearing/judgement, then use that certificate as a full defence;)

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

that default only leaves 14 days between writing and action required by so is invalid as it doesnt allow time for service, the agreement does not comply with the CCA request until the T&C,s are produced so the account is still in default so cant be enforced, it states they should be overleaf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on a mo. If your property is 10k in negative equity and you have no other assets then what would BR achieve (bear in mind your property might well be sold at auction and attract a discount). The first charge is the mortgage provider, they'd take all the proceeds of the sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...