Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I did as soon as i received the grade, i was on annual leave over December and my line manager was due to leave on the 15th December, i did not receive the review until i returned to work. SO i never had the opportunity to have a review. I challenged it straight away and raised a complaint to HR, who never responded to me,
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nottsdave/Capquest-Court date soon.


Nottsdave
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Dave and all who are helping you. Alarmingly, a third case has surfaced where HL is putting the CPR31.14 request into court as the defendent's defence - see here.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/186936-county-court-claim-2.html

 

I'd be grateful if any of you could add to rogermeard's thread from your experiences. HL legal, as ScabHunter says, now definitely appear to be using this as a tactic and it needs to be stopped.

 

DonkeyB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 488
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

well I rang the court today hoping to hear that the case had been struck out because they had run out of time (court gave 5 days from the 9th March).

No such luck as the guy at the court told me that they allow a couple of days for post and there`s a bit of a backlog , I was told to ring back in a couple of days:mad:.

And there was me thinking that 5 days meant 5 days, only in my world it would appear:confused:.

 

Notts

Edited by Nottsdave

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes this is not unknown I have dealt with 3 courts and all have a post backlog-thing is it should not reflect their deadline-it was either filed on time or it wasnt-if it wasnt,then its your call.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I rang the court again today to see if the case had been struck out (judge gave 5 days from the 5th March for the claimant to get there AQ in) surprise surprise no AQ has been received but the case now has to be refered back to the judge for action.

 

How long will this drag on !!!!

 

Notts

Edited by Nottsdave
fast fingers

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I rang the court again today to see if the case had been struck out (judge gave 5 days from the 5th March for the claimant to get there AQ in) surprise surprise no AQ has been received but the case now has to be refered back to the judge for action.

 

How long will this drag on !!!!

 

Notts

 

This is so unfair. Did the DJ say the case would be struck out if they didnt file within the extra 5 days ?. It is now the 18th, more than enough time to get themselves sorted.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, the letter clearly states ----

 

Quote

Unless the Claimant files an Allocation Questionnaire and pays the fee thereon within 5 days of service of this Order in default the Claim is struck out.

 

I dont think the AQ is coming from the other side;), but I still say five days is five days:confused:.

 

Really frustrating :mad:

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know how frustrating it is, i have had this twice myself now, the last time i wrote two letters to the court, in order to achieve success, if its been sent back to the judge to look at, you should get movement soon

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tam

 

I tired of ringing the courts to see if the case has been thrown out (due to backlog of work) Im expecting to hear this week.

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

 

I cannot believe whats happened, after the compete cock up regarding Northampton Bulk Centre claiming that my defence had been filed when it hadnt. Then after contacting Nottingham court over the past two weeks and being told that nothing had been received from the claimant I then get a letter from the court that states......

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

I refer to the above mentioned claim and your recent telephone conversation with a member of the Court staff.

It appears that you were incorrectly told that the Claimant had not filed an AQ, the Claimant had actually filed a AQ in Feb , the order dated the 5th March 2009 should not have drawn.

The file has today been referred to a district judge for allocation directions. so what does this mean ?

 

An order will be sent to you in due course. ?

 

Please accept the courts aploigies for any inconvienience caused. no I wont but it wont help me now

 

If you have any queries with reference to the above please do not hesitate to contact the Court on the above number.

 

Many Thanks

 

Blah Blah Blah

 

What happens now guys ?

 

Notts .... mad mad mad and very bemused.

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

 

I cannot believe whats happened, after the compete cock up regarding Northampton Bulk Centre claiming that my defence had been filed when it hadnt. Then after contacting Nottingham court over the past two weeks and being told that nothing had been received from the claimant I then get a letter from the court that states......

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

I refer to the above mentioned claim and your recent telephone conversation with a member of the Court staff.

It appears that you were incorrectly told that the Claimant had not filed an AQ, the Claimant had actually filed a AQ in Feb , the order dated the 5th March 2009 should not have drawn.

The file has today been referred to a district judge for allocation directions. so what does this mean ?

 

An order will be sent to you in due course. ?

 

Please accept the courts aploigies for any inconvienience caused. no I wont but it wont help me now

 

If you have any queries with reference to the above please do not hesitate to contact the Court on the above number.

 

Many Thanks

 

Blah Blah Blah

 

What happens now guys ?

 

Notts .... mad mad mad and very bemused.

 

 

Surely the court do no have proof that you filed the initial defense papers..

unless a hacker broke into your web page and used your password and

personal id to authenticate himself!!!!.... report it to the police!!!...

 

very odd, ask pt2537 for advice fast!!!!

 

Tam

Link to post
Share on other sites

the issue of the bogus defence was a error admitted to by the court, so thats kind of done and over with now.

 

It just highlights the number of errors made by the system.

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crikey, this is a bit of a muddle isnt it ?.

 

I guess what this now means is that things will be going ahead and that a court date will be sorted out. I am sorry, I dont really know what the procedure is. You have filed all your paperwork havent you ?

 

I really think you need to get in touch with creditcardmug, have you pm'd him. I will ask for a more experienced site member to look in on you.

  • Haha 1

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the next step is an allocation hearing where the judge will look at the claim and the defence documents, then allocate a track and set a trial date. That bit is straightforward.

 

My worry is if they can't get the straighforward bits right, what have they done with all the other paperwork? Beggars belief. Let's hope your correct defence is in place and that you're not nobbled by more cock-ups (or, er, allegedly dodgy practice by their solicitors).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nottsdave

 

These directions are made by the court at the allocation stage of litigation and depend on which track the case is allocated to, and the circumstances of the case. The criterion are set out in the Civil Procedures Rules, and usually made at the discretion of a procedural judge following receipt of allocation questionnaires. These directions allow the justice system to assign the most appropriate court resources to the dispute, having regard to the size of the financial claim and other material considerations.

 

Usually, a court will not issue allocations questionnaires until all of the Defences in the litigation are filed. It is these documents, which are filed and served by each party that the court relies on to allocate the case. The time for allocation may be delayed where a stay of proceedings has been ordered, or where the proceedings have been transferred to another court. The court is at liberty to require the parties to attend an allocation hearing if it thinks fit.

 

A court will make standard directions in small claims track cases. In fast track and multi-track cases a court will consider making directions that set out the timetable up to the hearing, which includes disclosure, exchange of witness statements, filing and serving of experts' reports (narrowing the issues for expert evidence), pre-trial checklists and listing the claim for trial.

 

Once a Defence has been filed in proceedings in either the County or the High Court, the next stage is the filing of Allocation Questionnaires. This is a document forwarded by the Court to each side. The Court sets a deadline by which the completed document must be returned to them.

 

The person who started the proceedings, i.e.: the Claimant also has to pay a fee to the Court of £80 when the Allocation Questionnaire is returned. In some straightforward matters the Court will dispense with an Allocation Questionnaire. This usually occurs when it is clear that the claim is for £5,000 or less and should therefore go into the Small Claims Court jurisdiction. The fee however is still payable. The Allocation Questionnaire will ask for information which will give the Judge a clearer idea of the issues between the parties. The Questionnaire asks about the following issues:

 

1. Whether the parties want the Court proceedings to be “stayed” i.e.: put into suspension for a period of one month to see if a settlement can be reached.

 

2. If the final Trial needs to be held at a different location and if so why.

 

3. A clear indication of the amount in dispute.

 

4. Some idea as to the number of witnesses that each party might be calling.

 

5. Confirmation as to whether Expert Evidence and Expert Reports will be needed.

 

6. Which Track the Solicitor believes is most appropriate for the case. Small Claims Track relates to claims of £5,000 or less. The Fast Track relates to claims of between £5,000 and £15,000 and the Multi Track applies to claims of over £15,000. Different procedures apply depending on the Track that is adopted. The Track can also be determined not necessarily by the amount in dispute but whether there are any complicated legal issues.

 

7. An indication as to how long the parties think they will need for the final Trial and if there are any dates they already know need to be avoided.

 

8. The timetable and items that the Solicitors believe will need to be dealt with before the case is ready for final Trial. These are referred to as Directions.

 

9. Some idea as to the legal costs already incurred.

 

10.Any other information, which will be of use to the Court.

 

Each party must file the Allocation Questionnaire with the Court by the date specified. They must also supply a copy of their completed Allocation Questionnaire to the other side. The Judge will then look at the two Allocation Questionnaires and the Court file and will decide what Directions are appropriate and whether or not a Case Management Conference is necessary. The Court will then send out an Order which will set out the timetable the Court requires, the list of things that will have to be done and any date fixed for the Case Management Conference. In most cases the Court will also fix a “window” for the final Trial.

 

 

Edited by ukaviator
  • Haha 1

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

they sent some statements and a poor application form which the mighty Scabhunter says is rubbish. No cancellation notice.

 

So i figure with what they have sent isnt enough for them to win.

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, you wont necessarily have to attend an allocation hearing, you will probably get an order for directions from the court shortly

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it will probably be allocated by post in your case.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...