Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Because of the tsunami of cases we are having for this scam site, over the weekend I had a look at MET cases we have here stretching back to June 2014.  Yes, ten years. MET have not once had the guts to put a case in front of a judge. In about 5% of cases they have issued court papers in the hope that the motorist will be terrified of going to court and will give in.  However, when the motorist defended, it was MET who bottled it.  Every time.
    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debts settled years ago-Now one is back!PLEASE HELP!


johndtray
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5680 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am hoping there is someone on here who can advise me accordingly on an unusual situation i have found myself in.

In 2004, i defaulted on 4 accounts, which to cut a long story short have all been settled for some time now, the last one being vodafone in january 2007.

Having returned from abroad, i noticed vodafone on my credit report and immediately called them. Vodafone identified the account in question, and informed me that the outstanding amount on the account was £46- I paid this immediately over the phone.

Several weeks later they confirmed this in writing- I replied to this letter asking them if they would be so kind as to remove the default from my credit report: This they did.

All was well since Jan 07.

 

ALL OF A SUDDEN after all this time (have also been keeping regular weekly tabs on my credit report),i receive a letter from red debt collection services, informing me that vodafone have 'sold' my debt of £71 to them, and that i needed to contact them to sort this out. STUNNED!

According to all my credit reports, the defaulted amount was settled in january 2007-Yet despite this, vodafone have no record of the payment every being made, despite me giving them the details off my bank statement.

Red Debt dont want to know-they just want the money.

 

I have this evening purchased my credit report from another agency (i now have all 3) which state that the vodafone isue was settled in jan 2007. total outstanding-£0.

How can vodafone lose a payment like this? i had thought i put all my troubles behind me i am rebuilding my credit superbly and have no debt anymore(im actually saving every month now and am in credit on all bills!).

 

Yet despite this, out of the blue a random letter from these people arrives.

My fiancee and i have turned the house upside down looking for the letter they sent me confirming the bill was paid: cant find it anywhere, as we have moved house since 2007.

I do however have all the transaction details,the date, the card used, AND my credit reports confirming the default was removed and payment was settled.

 

What do i do now?!

This company worries me- i can find no website for them, and they werent particularly understanding on the phone either.

 

Any help would be graciously received. Thanks guys.As always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, this company specialises in old debt, and you'll find that they are part of Lowells, well known on here. Im actually in a similar position myself sort of, i've settled my debts but have recieved no confirmation of doing so so im hoping that cheque stubs will be traceable if they should need to be.

In your case i'd imagine that all you need to do is send them copies of the things you do have, in particular the credit report (someone had to have imputed the data to the CRA to say the debt had been paid) along with a strongly worded letter to go away.

Best of Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

also, just thought, Red have no legal right to touch your credit report, that much i do know, but someone will be able to advise in more detail soon i would think.

 

well sadly, even if they are wrong [though they dont know it yet!] , they can default you.

 

if it were me i would be inclined send them a copy of the cra file that shows it settled in jan 2007 & demand the default is removed.

 

stay off the phone to the dca too! do it all in writing.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical of the way some companies work... Vodafone clear the account down and dispose of the paperwork, account settled and all that. If they've sold a debt then they may well have no record of the account any more.

However, there was a period where there was an amount owing, and this could have been detailed in a massive pile of debts that the company have since written off.

Trouble is that it does not end there. Despite writing an account off, paid or not in this case, the details of an outstanding balance have been sold, in bulk (millions of pounds worth at a time!) to the bunch of vultures known as Debt Collection Agencies.

DCA's are not known for their honesty, tact, attitude, brain power or use of deodorant. They have a pile of paperwork from Vodafone, or whoever, and it takes a while to get all this on their system.

Once they have it computerised they start chasing the alleged debtors for payment. Thousands of them at once, they don't check every account they are dealing with. Contact can be by phone or letter, sometimes they'll even suggest that you'll have someone calling to see you. They will make threats, they are nothing less, about legal action, bailiffs and whatever they feel may convince you to pay up.

Except in this case they've been sold a dummy. You have already paid the debt off. Ask them to prove that you owe THEM anything, they have to have valid paperwork which would stand up in court. You already have this to back up your side of the story, even if you cannot find the Vodafone letter.

There's lots of advice and sample letters on here to help. Above all, don't be afraid of Red aka Lowell aka several other names they use. Once they admit they are wrong you need to keep their letter safe as they are babies, they sulk if they lose a case, and may pass it to another DCA just for the hell of it.

Be very careful what you say to them, only provide personal information if you really have to, never send original documents, always copies. They lose things...

No, I don't trust them, like them, want to play chess with them or share a room with them - for the reasons given above.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...