Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court summons for fradulent DVLA claim! any help appreciated!!


k67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope that somebody can help! I am desperate for advice on this!

 

In August I caught a DVLA enforment agent taking photos of my car (declared sorn, parked off road and not actually working for over a year!) in the car park where it has been for over a year. When approached he bumbled out something about new government laws declaring that no vehicle that was untaxed could be kept on private land (!) said there was nothing to worry about and drove off!

 

In Sept I received a letter asking for £305 out of court settlement as my car had been parked on a public road with no valid tax. After arguing this I was told that they had photographic evidence. When I was shown this "evidence" it was pictures of my car, parked where it is, outside my flat, on private land! The guy had put a clamp on it and taken photos of this shortly before I approached him!!!

 

His story is that he clamped the vehicle on a public road and then when he returned the next day to tow it away both the car and clamp had vanished!!

 

I have repeatedly refused to pay the fines and am now being taken to court - tomorrow! I have gotten everyone from the Citizens advice to the local MP involved in getting this dropped but to no avail and have to go to court tomorrow afternoon to fight it!

 

Any advice will be grately apprieciated!!

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there witnesses from your neighbours who can see the car and can swear that the car has been on private land for the claimed year?

 

If so you will have to ask the judge to put your hearing back so you can get 'sworn' witness statements from these people to back up you case.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

surely the photographic evidence showing the car on private land will mean you win no problem????

 

Obviously i hope you have checked to be certain that the land your car is parked on IS private. Theres a few other threads with similar situations in carparks which might have the exact info/wording.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply!

 

Car is definitely parked on private land! The photos that he took were produced as evidence by the Sidcup office and I showed them a photo on my phone that I had taken that morning and you could clearly see that the photos were taken in the same place! They then said that photos taken on a digital camera etc cannot be used as evidence as they can be doctored very easily and they have not included their photos in thier evidence sent with the summons.

 

I do have statements from 2 neighbours confirming that the car does not/has not moved and one of these neighbours saw the DVLA guy in the car park taking some photos though didn't see him use the clamp as he had parked his van across the front of my car, probably to hide this fact!

 

Am quite worried about going to court especially as it seems to be a case of his word against mine!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be worried k67. This is not in a big court with a jury and legal people spouting such things as 'my learned friend' etc; like you see on the telly.

 

Judges are not silly so mention that you have pics on your phone and if the judge wishes to see them he will ask you to show him.

 

There will be a duty solicitor there if you need any help, he is paid by the court so won't cost you anything, so get there early and check it out.

 

And don't be afraid to use the word 'lies' in respect of the ticket man. Just tell it like it is.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks!

 

Am taking print outs of the photos of the car that I have along with witness statements and letters from the Citizens Advice Bureau & my MP (Anything to help!)

 

I know that I shouldn't be worried as I have done nothing wrong at all yet here I am being taken to court!

 

Hopefully it will be resolved tomorrow and I will post the outcome on here

 

Thanks again for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have appeared in court and I have to go back in January for a proper hearing!

 

I spoke to the duty solicitor when I arrived and told him that I had lots of evidence; photos, statements etc to prove that the enforcement agent was lying and that I was planning to show my evidence today. He said that I shouldn't do this as that is exactly what the DVLA want, he said "the DVLA are meant to let you know every bit of evidence that they have but they rarely do, they always like to keep a few tricks up they're sleeves so that they can surprise you in a hearing, keep everything that you have very close to your chest".

 

He then said that he would go and see if he could find out anything from the prosecutor. When he came back he said that the DVLA prosecutor was very surprised that I had turned up! Did they think that I would just pay fines for an offence that the enforcement agent has dreamt up??

 

I went into court, plead not guilty and when asked what my issue was I told them that it was a falsification, that the claim was fradulent. I was asked if I could back this up and said that I had evidence to support this however I wanted to sow this at a hearing when all parties were present, including they're enforcement agent. They replied that they would "just add that to the costs" and I was given another date to return and sent on my way!

 

I am furious that I have been looked upon and treated like a criminal! I have never meant such a bunch of unfriendly, intimidating people! I naively thought that you were presumed innocent until found giulty but that is not the case at all!!

 

To make this worse, the duty solicitor told me that in his opinion the DVLA were nothing but a money making scheme for the government, that he sees so many people coming through the court where it is obvious that they have done nothing wrong and the DVLA are just blatently trying to pull a fast one!!

 

I am going to go back to my MP and will also be writing to newspapers and watchdog about this!!

 

If anyone else out there wants to do the same maybe (probaby being naive again!) we can actually get somewhere!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you might possibly have a case for malicious prosecution here I would take advice from the CAB or find a solicitor ( a good one not a shyster) most will be willing to give you a 1/2 consultation free of charge and may well take the case on a no win no fee basis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think that I really could have a cse for this?

 

Do I have to wait until it's all over first?

 

I Know the local CAB woman quite well now and will seek her advice however I think that she is just a general adviser and don't think that she speacialises in legal issues! I'm quite stuck for free legal advice, I have tried most places that I could think of already!

 

I can't afford a solicitor and do not qualify for legal aid as apparently this comes under the "parking offence" catagory and isn't considered serious!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done K. Now that you have been once it won't be so intimidating the next time.

 

Of course the duty solicitor is correct, we have all known this since the continuous rip-off was introduced and they became just the latest in the governments stealth taxes.

 

Did the duty solicitor give you a business card? The way he has the DVLA weighed up it would make sense to take advice from him if it comes to the need of a solicitor after you have shown the DVLA up for what they really are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just a quick update!

 

I had still heard nothing from either the MP regarding the letter that she sent on my behalf to the DVLA chief executive or the chief executive himself and so I chased her up on Monday.

 

I sent an e-mail to her mentioning this website and the many many people that are having continuous problems with the DVLA and being wrongly taken to court etc. I also explained what the duty solicitor at the court had told me regarding the DVLA being a money making scheme and that he wouldn't be surprised if the top boss was connected to the criminal underworld.

 

I recieved a letter from her this morning with a copy of another letter that she has sent to the Chief executive, along with my e-mail, asking him for a reply to her letters and also an explanation regarding the comments that I have made!

 

I will update this if I get a reply but judging the amount of letters that the DVLA "do not recieve" I will not be surprised if we do not get a reply!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will update this if I get a reply but judging the amount of letters that the DVLA "do not recieve" I will not be surprised if we do not get a reply!!

 

Now now, that's a bit unfair. Surely you realise the DVLA only lose letters that can subsequently allow them to send a fine out. They have no need to not receive other types of mail that they cannot make financial gain from. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If this gets back in court, I wouldn't be surprised if DVLA do not show. You might find that they decide to drop it before it gets back, that is the type of people they are, they don't want bad publicity.

 

Are your papers etc; ready for your appearance? Have you been notified of the exact date? Do you have any legal representation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats quite suprising the way the dvla are acting in order to screw out every penny they can from joe public.

 

if they made you an offer to settle out of court, then it makes me think they are not happy to go into court.

 

is it possible that you can scan the notice they sent you demanding payment and post it on here?

 

i wish i had come on this DB sooner. i may have been able to help you discharge their notice. its very important to enter into negotiation with the other party before they take you to court.

 

please keep us informed of your progress

"... all legal obligations arose from FREE CHOICE - which, if it was not expressed, must then be implied"

 

P.S. Atiyah, Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update again!

 

I received a letter yesterday from the prosectutor at the DVLA informing me that "in view of further information received it is the Agency's intention to offer no evidence against me" and so on! I could not believe this and so rang and spoke to her for confirmation and, yes, it is true, the case against me has been dropped and it is all over!!!!!

 

The prosecutor was a very nice lady by the name of Natalie Bushell and when I questioned her about the whole thing she told me that whether it was a fradulent claim, on behalf of the car pound, or not the DVLA had received a report of an offence and had followed proceedure accordingly. However it has come to light that "an error" was made by the actual car pound/enforcement agent and so the case has been dropped.

 

She couldn't detail what this "error" was but when I told her that it was infact the enforcement agent blatently trying to pull a fast one and that the car has not moved for well over a year and cannot move as it is broken she told me that she was not at all surprised by this!!!!!!!!!!

 

So there you have it - the prosecutors at the DVLA are, it seems, well aware of what the enforcement agents are up to!!!

 

Am very relieved that it is all over, with regards to them taking me to court however I am now very interested in what my local MP (who has been a great help so far and I recommend that everyone having trouble with the DVLA to get them on board!) intends to do about DVLA agents making fradulent allegations in her area!

 

It amazes me that the DVLA try it on like this and I wonder how many people may have paid up purely because the threat of court has scared them into doing so!!

 

I will keep you posted!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"So there we have it" ? Are you going to drop it here or see what you can do about the enforcement officer/agency ?

 

Others may already have paid fraudulent claims and there could be more to come so he needs to be stopped.

 

I would say that the fault is not with DVLA this time as they were just acting on a report. I wonder if they are continuing to use this enforcer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it was not the fault of the DVLA this time and on a whole, the people from the DVLA have been polite and helpful. I did understand that as far as they were concerned they had received a report of an offence and were just following procedure as they are supposed to, however it was very frustrating to know full well that I was entirely innocent of this offence and yet still I had to go to lengths to prove my innocence!

 

I am going to drop it as far as the DVLA are concerned but I am definitely taking it further regarding the actual enforcement agent.

 

I will be asking my MP what they plan to do about him and am also considering writing to the local papers to warn people about what is going on!

 

I think it would be a fair assumption to say that this isn't the first time that this has happened and I feel that the pound needs to be investigated as who knows how many people have paid fines for offences that they did not commit!

 

Thank you Conniff for your advice and if anybody has any more as to how I should go about taking this further please advise

 

Many thanks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I belive I was targeted by the same DVLA enforcement agent, would be even worse if there is more then one enforcement agent at Mitcham DVLA making these false reports. Have my court date next week, would really aprecciate if you can help me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have you highlighted you case in the press how the dvla wanted to take you to court then when you proved them wrong they dropped the case i would also ask the dvla for costs you calls mailing etc if they say not our fault say you employed them

regards dk

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

I belive I was targeted by the same DVLA enforcement agent, would be even worse if there is more then one enforcement agent at Mitcham DVLA making these false reports. Have my court date next week, would really aprecciate if you can help me.

 

 

Would gladly help! Do you know the DVLA agents name?

 

Do you have evidence to use against them?

 

I would get in touch with the MP Siobhan McDonagh as she was extremely helpful!! [email protected]

I found that she wrote to the DVLA straight away once I had e-mailed her. I mentioned to her that I had been on this website and you should too! As she has been dealing with my case I think it would be a great idea for you to enlist her help! Not only as she seemed to have a bit of clout in getting the DVLA to sit up and pay attention but also it will highlight the fact that the enforcement agents are creating fradulent claims in her area and that my case was clearly not just a one off!!

Let me know if I can help in any other way!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...