Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Some advice re: an interim charging order pls


lisaf
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5473 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, yes i did send it (will check what date when i have my folder) but it was a good few weeks ago.

I've just realised i haven't sent a cca request (duh)! as i didn't read the cpr18 properly and assumed that encompassed the cca.

I will do that first thing on Monday. Are they obliged to supply it even though it's been judgemented?

Thanks again

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Guys. Do you have the template for the dec under s.142?

What if they don't send the agreement or DN within the 14 days? Can i construct my set-aside on that alone - the fact that they haven't replied?

Thanks again

Lisa

 

 

If they don't respond to the Disclosure request within the 14 days you then make an application to the court for an Order for disclosure. On the same application you also request a stay in enforcement proceedings until the Claimant complies with the Order (i.e. stay the final charging hearing).

 

Then if they still don't comply you can make application to set aside on that basis in that they don't have the CCA or default notice.

 

The court process is all about tactics as you will quickly learn...............

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, maybe someone with more expertise could advise you on whether you could send this:

 

For the Attention of the Case Manager

In the matter of

 

Claim Number

 

In My Local CC

 

My Address

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

RE: FAILURE BY CLAIMANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION

 

I would like to inform the court of some difficulties that I am experiencing with the above claim which may prevent me filing a fully particularised defense and counter claim to this action, and may consequently frustrate proceedings.

 

On [XXXXX] I sent the claimant a formal request under the consumer credit agreement, for account. I requested a copy of the credit agreement, a statement of account, and copies of the relevant terms and conditions. I have still not received this information.

 

On [XXXXXX] I also sent a CPR18 request for the claimant to send me information in relation to their claim, that I consider is vital in order to produce a defense and counter claim.

 

I enclose copies of my requests together with proof of postage and proof of delivery to the claimant, and ask that the court consider the matter and take any action it deems appropriate.

 

Enc:-

Letter requesting CCA

Proof of postage

Proof of Delivery

 

Letter requesting disclosure CPR 18

Proof of Postage

Proof of Delivery

 

Good letter but the main problem is that at this moment in time the court isn't expecting you to file a defence or counterclaim as the Claimant already has judgment. You could say that it was frustrating your intention to make application to set aside default judgment I suppose but I think an application for Disclosure wiull be more effective.

  • Haha 1

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

now i'm assuming i can send that letter now as the cpr18 and cca request were sent on 3rd Dec and they still haven't complied?

Is it too early too send that into court?

Josie - how do i go about an application for disclosure?

Many many thanks

Lisa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once an interim Charging Order has been granted it is very difficult to prevent the Final Charging Order going ahead unless you have applied for a setaside. This will cost money to do but if you win , you can reclaim the cost from the other side and if you are on certain benefits, the Court will not charge for the setaside-so ask the Court if you qualify.

To possibly get round paying for a setaside, write to the DCA advising them that as they are In breach of CPR and the CCA 1974, you will apply for a set aside which will incur them with extra charges if they cannot produce a valid CCA and Default Notice in Court.Tell them that unless they either agree to write to the Court dropping the Charging Order, or providing the required documents with 14 days, you will without further notice apply for the Set aside which will be heard alongside the Final Charging Order and that you will be attending Court on the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Lookinforinfo, but I totally disagree with your opening statement.

A creditor wants a charging order, so the system allows him to apply for an interim order to stop the debtor selling his house quickly and hence avoiding the CO. The creditor now has to go to court and convince the judge that the CO should be granted. I know some judges are unsympathetic to debtors. I found a judge who was sympathetic to my arguments. He dismissed the interim CO and awarded me costs. Normally for a conventional CCJ, Mercantile Credit V Ellis should suffice, but I also used prejudical to other creditors and other arguments which I have previously written about on this site.

The debtor should always go into court and fight. It doesn't help to give up before the court appearance.

regards,

Muscat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lookingforinfo and Muscat - so basically i should try and get the ccj set-aside, is that right? I'm assuming i use the fact that they have not complied with my request?

I actually have just applied for another set-aside for the same thing (hsbc cc) as i had just missed the defence deadline by one day (totally miscalculated timescales)!

Anyway, that is scheduled for the 10th March (have another thread going on that). That was the first set-aside i have done. Now if i use more or less the same defence i used for hsbc, is there a chance that it will be heard along with the final CO hearing?

But whereas hsbc admitted they have no agreement, i just use the fact that howard cohen and co have not even bothered to reply?

Many thanks for all your help and advice

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Muscat, i don't think Lisaf or any other following this thread and in the same boat are even thinking of giving up.

My concern is that if the Judge is unsympathetic, the Interim Order will become Final, almost rubberstamped, even if the defendant is present. So it is much better to prevent an Order becoming Final, than to try and get a Final Charging Order quashed which is why I said that the set aside would probably be the best way to argue against making the Order Final.

As such I am not really concerned what the creditor wants, but how best to stop them in their tracks. so by asking for a set aside, if they fail to provide either a valid executed agreement or Default Notice then the Charging Order will be thrown out and Lisaf can claim costs. If all their documentation is in order Lisaf still has the fall back arguments that it would be hamful/unfair

to the other half, children and the boss as well as other arguments mooted in earlier posts.

And yes. the set aside will usually be heard alongside the Final Order hearing

so you should know by the end of the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

right just trying to draft out the n244 and would like a bit of advice/opinions please.

Question 3: What order are you asking the court to make and why?:

The set aside has been requested because information requested from the claimant under the relevant cpr has not been provided to me.

Being a litigant in person and unfamiliar with court protocol i was unaware i could apply for a stay in proceedings and apologise to the court. However, as i have received no reponse at all from the claimant regarding my cpr request which is required under the consumer credit act 1974 and that therefore i would request that the court accepts these reasons for a set aside of the original judgement and provides judgement as follows:

1/ The claimant's claim is without substance and being unsupported by anagreement is declared void.

2/ The claimant, having not provided a copy of the original agreement is instructed to remove any reference to this agreement with all third party credit reference agencies.

 

Question 4/ Have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for?

Having received no notification from the claimant that they have a copy of the original agreement which is required by the consumer credit act 1974 and should have been produced to the court when seeking judgement, I would respectfully request that the court accepts these reasons for a set aside of the original judgement and provides judgement as follows:

1/ The claimant's claim is without substance and being unsupported by a regulated agreement is declared void.

2/ The claimant, having not provided a regulated agreement is instructed to remove any reference to this agreement with all third party credit reference agencies.

3/ Any attempt at enforcement is without substance and being unsupported by a regulated agreement, the defendant respectfully requests from the court a declaration under s142 (1) of the consumer credit act.

 

10/ What evidence will you be relying on, in support of your application?

Now this is the one i'm not too sure about, but how about this?

The defendant would like to draw the attention of the court, the provisions of the consumer credit act 1974, as it pertains to the legislative obligations of creditors. The act makes it clear that a credit agreement is required by law.

Now it's here that i come unstuck a bit as with my other set aside, they admitted they didn't have the agreement but here, they just haven't bothered replying at all.

Any advice would be so gratefully rec'd!

Lisa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, just checked track and trace and it was sent 3rd dec and delivered 4th dec so they have had more than enough time.

Is it wise to send them another reminder? Would that look favourably in court?

Many thanks again

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Have you applied for the CCJ set-aside ?

 

If so, You could send a reminder to the creditor that a court hearing about this is imminent.

 

As it stands, until you apply for the set-aside, the CCJ is THE agreement as it has subsumed the original Credit Card Agreement.

 

Have a read of this thread to see how x20 explains it.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/167336-charging-order-hearing-18-a.html and the thread linked in it.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Supa - no i haven't applied yet for the set aside but i want to asap (as per my post 66). I have part filled the n244 i need some help with filling the rest in and whether what i have done already is good enough?

Would someone be able to advise as i want to get this done this week if poss?

Many many thanks

Lisa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

In section 3 you must state you are requesting a set set -aside of the CCJ.

Reason - you believe that there is no CCA that the original judgement was based.

 

This is a very good website and explains everything:

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 12 How To Set Aside A Judgment In The County Court

 

and this one

 

http://www.insolvencyhelpline.co.uk/

 

Scroll down and its on the left hand side under GENERAL DEBT ADVICE

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Supa -though i'd covered it with this?

quote:

Question 3: What order are you asking the court to make and why?:

The set aside has been requested because information requested from the claimant under the relevant cpr has not been provided to me.

Being a litigant in person and unfamiliar with court protocol i was unaware i could apply for a stay in proceedings and apologise to the court. However, as i have received no reponse at all from the claimant regarding my cpr request which is required under the consumer credit act 1974 and that therefore i would request that the court accepts these reasons for a set aside of the original judgement and provides judgement as follows:

1/ The claimant's claim is without substance and being unsupported by anagreement is declared void.

2/ The claimant, having not provided a copy of the original agreement is instructed to remove any reference to this agreement with all third party credit reference agencies.

 

Supa would this suffice? Do you think i need/should add anything else?

 

Lisa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Lisa I have not been at my computer for a few days so thanks to Supasnooper for filling in.

 

You should point out that you have not been provided with the Default Notice and without a valid DN, they cannot apply for a Charging Order.

In case they do have both a valid DN and a valid Executed agreement, then you should also add that to apply a Charging Order is unfair on your other half, the boss and any other creditors.

 

When you fill out the Set aside, it will ask for the case number you are referring to, and from that the Court will marry your set aside with the Court case in March so that both will be heard at the same time. They will also send you a Court date of when the Set aside will be heard-if it is not at the same time as the Charging Order hearing, call the Court and they will amend it.

If you want to add evidence, you can include your request to the other side for information, stating that nothing ahs been received. You ncan also add statements from your other hal etc saying that it is unfair that they should be penalised for a debt that is not theirs etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LFI - thanks so much for that. Now do i add that the haven't issued DN onto the end of question 3?

And also any advice on question 10?

Sorry! - just want to get it all done proper so the slippery so and so's can't wriggle out of anything!

Also do i send them a reminder that they haven't yet sent anything and if so is there a suitable template to use?

Thanks so much again - i really am learning new things here every day!

Lisa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...