Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I suggested consideration of bankruptcy some years ago. It was not well received.
    • That is a superb WS. However, I have a few tweaks to suggest. In (2) "indicating" not "indication". I think to be consistent with your numbering, in (6) the Beavis case should be EXHIBIT 2. Do you really need to include over 100 pages of Beavis?  I think that would be likely to annoy the judge.  Just try and find the bit where they decide it was not a penalty due to having an interest in limiting the time that vehicles can stay. I'll have a look myself for this bit later as it's highly likely to be in WSs from PPCs who think that that paragraph means all their charges are valid always on every occasion. After your current (7) add this.  It's always useful to refer to a judgment when making a legal point - 8.  In the case PCM vs Bull, Claim No. B4GF26K6, where the Defendant was issued parking tickets for parking on private roads with signage stating “No parking at any time”, District Judge Glen in his final statement mentioned that: “the notice was prohibitive and didn’t communicate any offer of parking and that landowners may have claim in trespass, but that was not under consideration”.   In (14) if my maths are right the CPR request should be "EXHIBIT 3".  it is missing from your list of exhibits. In (16) the two figures should be £100 and £170.  They are entitled to increase fro,m £60 to £100, they are not entitled to increase to £170.  To make it clear for the judge I would write - 16. The Claimant has artificially inflated their claim for a £100 invoice to £170. This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims. 17. The Claimant has also invented a second fictitious charge, for legal representative's costs, when they have no legal representative. You also need ot number your exhibits. The rest is excellent - well done.
    • Did you ever think of walking away? Become bankrupt and in 12 months it'll all be behind you. My feeling is that you may well get nothing from the sale of the property anyway. Going by the date this thread started it looks like eight years of arrears, lender's costs and receiver’s fees on top.
    • Just to clarify - I make use of evening legal clinics. It is not always possible to see a lawyer (they have limited time and days/week).  This means questions one has may never get answered or there's weeks between follow-ups.   To be really clear - I am representing myself; I am playing at being lawyer/ barrister - which means I take help wherever I can get it (and then research it thoroughly). Ae - a judge in a recent hearing pointed out the receiver is not part of my current proceedings - and suggested I have a separate claim v the receiver. Disclosure has presented damning evidence v the receiver  The receiver against whom I have a complaint is not part of the receiver governing body.   The receivership is in 2 names - a joint one.  My complaint is directed at whom I was told is the lead receiver.  The other named receiver IS a member of the governing body.  But he has now left the company.  And the lead receiver has retired - but is still a working consultant on my case.   All the evidence shows it was the 'lead' receiver who was doing all the  work/ the misbehaviour.   But if the appointment was 'joint' would I make a complaint against them both?    I am sure that wouldn't go down well with the other receiver who is at the beginning of his career. The law is very much against borrowers.   But the evidence against this receivership is crystal clear.   I just don't know how and to whom to complain.   The places I've tried so far don't offer much transparency       
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mathematicians Needed - Help with Credit Agreement Figures


Guest suziedarkness
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5317 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest suziedarkness

Hello all you clever bods, I was wondering if anyone out there could explain a couple of things to me regarding calculations on a Credit Agreement.

 

Firstly, what is the difference between APR and interest rate?

 

How are these calculated?

 

If you had a loan of £6295.00 over 60 months at an APR 16.5%, interest rate 14.14% pa, how much would you calculate the repayments to be?

 

I am really confused as I am trying to see if the figures are correct on an agreement and I dont know how it works.

 

Many thanks

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

suziedarkness,

I got the following illustration from the FSA website (Money made clear). I hope it helps:

 

 

APR stands for the Annual Percentage Rate of charge. You can use it to compare different credit and loan offers. The APR includes important factors such as:

  • the interest rate you must pay;
  • how you repay the loan; the length of the loan agreement (or term); frequency and timing of instalment payments; and amount of each payment;
  • certain fees associated with the loan; and
  • premiums for payment protection insurance that the lender chooses to make compulsory.

All lenders have to tell you what their APR is before you sign an agreement. It will vary from lender to lender. Generally, the lower the APR the better the deal for you, so if you are thinking about borrowing, shop around.

Example 1:

 

If you borrow £1,000 for one year at 20% interest, and at the end of the year you repay a lump sum of £1,200:

  • you will be paying an interest rate of 20%; and
  • the APR will also be 20%.

Example 2:

 

If you borrow £1,000 for one year at 20% interest, and pay throughout the year in equal monthly instalments (12 x £100 = £1,200),

  • you will still be paying an interest rate of 20%; but
  • the APR, however, will be roughly 40%.

Example 2 is more expensive because you are paying back the £1,000 gradually throughout the year. In Example 1 you have the benefit of being able to access the £1,200 for the whole year, which you could invest and earn interest on. By paying in instalments you're losing out; this increases the cost of the loan - hence the higher APR.

Edited by bennyowen
Change "easy" to "clear"
Link to post
Share on other sites

for the agreement to be valid it should show how much interest has been charged and how much the payments are and the date due amongst other things. Are these figures shown. It maybe advisable to scan your agreement in taking out all the personal details, ie account number, signature, address, to see exactly what you have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

I dont know how to post docs on here.

 

I just wanted someone to give me what they think the correct figures should be as I have tried various loan calculators on the net and they all give me different answers. Im so confused!! lol

 

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

Thanks Bennyowen for that, I sort of understand a little. So should the interest rate figure and the APR figure amount to the same charge for interest when worked out on the loan agreement?

 

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

Thanks for that Surprise.

 

My repayments are £150.27. What does this mean if they have calculated incorrectly?

 

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

Hi MikeK,

 

No, there was no ppi.

Under the key financial information it says:

 

Amount of Credit £6295.00

60 months

Total amount payable £10,291.20

one repayment of £150.27 followed by 58 instalments of £150.27 followed by a final repayment of £225.27 (which includes £75.00 Acceptamce Fee)

APR 16.5%

Other financial information says:

Description of goods

Total cash price £7495.00

Advance payment £1200.00

Hire purchase charges £2576.20

Acceptance fee 145.00

Purchase fee 75.00

Total charge for credit £2796.20

Interest Rate 14.14% per annum.

 

 

What do you reckon MikeK. Unenforceable? if so, what does this mean?

 

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

You gave me the wrong information to work on initially. You failed to mention the other payments it makes a difference when they include the other fees as you pay interest on this over the 60 payments. The total amount you borrowed was more than the 6295 you originally stated and this was the figure I based my workings on not on 7490.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

No surprise I dont think that is correct. The 2 fees were payable in 2 instalments the first £145 was an acceptance fee payable with the 1st instalment and the other £75 payable with the last instalment. I am led to believe that these are not part of the finance as such for the vehicle.

 

I apologise if you are right, I really have no clue as to what is correct. I am only going by what I was told by someone else.

 

Does this mean the figures are correct?

 

suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

How they have worked it is Amount owing £10291.20 - £1,200 = £9091.20 to pay.

 

Calculations work out

£6295.00 + £145.00 = £6440 x 14.14% interest = £9018.92 + £75.00 = £9093.92

 

your paying 59 payments of £150.27 = £8,865.93 + £225.27 = £9091.20

 

They are out slightly but then they can be upto I think 1% plus its in your favour actually. The payments should work out at £150.32.

 

I presume the agreement is both signed and dated by yourself and Black Horse.

 

The slight difference in the calculations would not make the agreemnt unenforceable, imho, that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am getting the exact figures that the contract states if the annual rate projected from the APR is 14.13% (14.1264% to be exact) instead of 14.14%. The difference is minor and to your favour i.e. you have not suffered prejudice.

 

But because they can state +1% -0.1% of the APR, when projecting interest from APR the tolerances could be argued.

 

I agree with the previous post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

Just one further question Surprise, why has the £145.000 been charged interest in your calculation but not the £75.00?

 

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because the £145 has clearly been rolled into the payments while the £75 is described as being paid seperately in the last month on top of the last payment (£150.27 + £75). If they were to charge interest on the £75 fee, the fee would have to be rolled into the payments somehow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You find a lot of loans were there is a payment fee get calculated into the loan figure - they make more money by doing this - I believe they should give you the opportunity of paying this arrangement fee which it is sometimes called.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

Hi Surprise and MikeK,

 

Thanks for your responses, very much appreciated.

 

what I am really p*****d off about is they have charged interest on the £145.oo but that sum was paid in full with the first instalment, i.e. £295.00 instead of £150.00 just like the £75.00 has to be paid in full with the last instalment. There was no option to spread it, so how can they charge interest on it when it was paid? I just dont understand.

 

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a difficult one to answer as (a) you paid £145 with the first instalment so therefore it would have been included into the interest (b) did they give you the opportunity to pay £145 prior to the setting up of the agreement? Personally, I would be inclined to write to them and say that you feel you have been misled as you have now discovered the £145.00 has been accruing interest charges over the term of the agreement when in actual fact you paid it along with the first instalment. see what they come back with, they may say no its not accruing interest in which case their figures will be wrong as you would have only been paying around £146.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...