Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
    • Read how your orgnisation can make opportunities and employment more accessible for disadvantaged young people.View the full article
    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
    • Richard Holden refusing ro answer Jon Craig's questions in a Sky pool interview and his spad argiung about the questions. As Jon said, not his finest hour.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bailiffs have taken my van off my driveway, do i have a leg to stand on ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5716 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi tomtubby,

 

i have just been on the phone to the council, they said that no one in the office knows much about the fees etc and the only man who does is the head of recovery. They say he will be in the office later today and will call me with a matter of urgency. I told the person i just spoke to the fees the bailiffs charged charged me over the phone, and i assume he took a note of this. He said he couldnt comment and that the man in charge of recovery is the only person with any knowledge of these situations. He said he would pass this info on to the 'main man' and that the 'main man' would get in touch with the bailiffs and then be in touch with me. They also stated that the total amount i owe is £524.90 + £791.61 = £1316.51

 

Is there anything else i can do in the meantime, i only ask as i feel a little useless just sitting here, especially if there is something that i can do.

 

Cheers and thanks for your time.

Edited by stanns
Link to post
Share on other sites

The appellant makes a complaint to a justice of the peace and requests the issue of a summons requiring the authority whichlevied, or attempted to levy, the distress to appear before the court to answer to the matter bywhich the person is aggrieved. It is the local authority, and not the person who levied thedistress on their behalf, who must answer such a complaint in the magistrates’ court.

 

 

I think that means an N244 application which you can download here

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_e.pdf

 

 

 

TT, any comment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

SUGGESTED LETTER

 

The Chief Clerk

Anytown Magistrates Court

Address

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I am writing to request that you issue a Summons against --Enter name of City Council-- by virtue of Regulation 46 Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regs 1992.

 

I am aggrieved by the levy carried out by ......... on ......... because the levy clearly fails to meet the requirements set out in the case of Ann Ambrose -v- Nottingham City Council.

 

I enclose a copy of the inventory that was left by ......... following the levy.

 

I trust this will be sufficient and please do not hesitate to contact me if you require further information.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

I can't take the credit for finding that one - it looks great!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi chris and thanks for the advice, much appreciated.

 

Will i now need to download and complete a form 4 complaint, along with a N244 application and take or send the suggested letter to the magistrates court ?

 

Also, in the blank fields on the suggested letter, do i just insert B&S or do i need to contact B&S to get the name of the bailiff who removed the van ?

 

Cheers and thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, its now 11:30a.m. and i still havent heard back from the council regarding the fees. I'm still waiting to hear from the head of recovery.

 

I've also just come off the phone to B&S and they have given me the name of the bailiff who removed my van.

 

How do i go about checking that this bailiff is certified ?

 

Also, at what stage should complete all the prementioned forms?

 

any help would be much appreciated...cheers and thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the bailiff was not certificated then the van must be released but I am no longer allowed to search so will instead post details of the relevant court the B & S bailiffs' normally use.

 

There is something that you can do that is not used very often which is a Regulation 46 Complaint to the Magistrates Court to ask them to agree to remove the levy on the vehicle. This complaint is becoming far more common and we have seen many of these cases recently.It is a simple form that you need to take into your local Magistrates Court early tomorrow.

 

I will adapt one used a few days ago and post here for you later this morning.

 

Hopefully TT will be back on soon with the number so you can check the bailiff cert.

 

Also the letter in post 31 probably needs to be checked by TT. She mentioned that she will adapt the letter so may be different to the one posted. It talks about an incorrect levy so she may have questions to check if yours was indeed incorrect. Have you got a copy of the levy they made on your car? The wording seems to be quite important. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi KJD and thanks for your response, much appreciated.

 

Firstly, i have just come off the phone to the OFT (020 7211 86081) and gave them the name of the bailiff that removed my van and the company he works for (B&S). The lady ran a search and found the company (B&S) and she stated that the name given by myself (the bailiffs name who removed my van) was not on the register as being certified by B&S.

 

Also, i received two letters through the door when the van was taken yesterday. The first was a white letter titled 'INVENTORY'. The letter only contains the registration and a description of the van and my name and address, there are no figures or anything else on the letter. The blue letter that accompanied the white letter is the one that has all the figures on it. These figures are accurate as i double checked them before posting them on here previously. They are as follows:

 

council tax = 524.90

levy fee = 42.00

council tax = 791.61

levy fee = 49.00

attendance to levy fees = 67.00

costs incurred in attendance to remove goods = 360.00

costs incurred in the removal of goods = 380.00

contractors fee incurred in the removal of goods = 175.00

redemption of goods fee(Head H) = 24.50

 

Sub Total = 2414.01

 

Cheers and thanks for your time, much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, i received two letters through the door when the van was taken yesterday. The first was a white letter titled 'INVENTORY'. The letter only contains the registration and a description of the van and my name and address, there are no figures or anything else on the letter. The blue letter that accompanied the white letter is the one that has all the figures on it. These figures are accurate as i double checked them before posting them on here previously. They are as follows:

 

council tax = 524.90

levy fee = 42.00

council tax = 791.61

levy fee = 49.00

attendance to levy fees = 67.00

costs incurred in attendance to remove goods = 360.00

costs incurred in the removal of goods = 380.00

contractors fee incurred in the removal of goods = 175.00

redemption of goods fee(Head H) = 24.50

 

Sub Total = 2414.01

 

Cheers and thanks for your time, much appreciated.

 

Okay, so this raises a question which has occurred to me several times recently when reading peoples threads...

 

I thought that the idea of a levy is so that the bailiffs have some sort of 'collateral' on which to make you pay up. Ie, they levy on your van, so you can't do anything with it until you have either paid or come to an arrangement to pay. So, how come they can levy and then remove straight away? Surely that defeats the object. Or have I misunderstood?

 

Also, the figures above are clearly wrong because, as TT said, they can only charge one levy fee, even if for two 'debts'. And what's this costs + costs + contractors fee? That's a total of £915 to remove a van??

 

This link was posted on another thread yesterday re the fees which can be charged (thanks to jenjuly82)

 

http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w16/jenjuly82/scan0001.jpg

 

I guess the problem is what is classed as "reasonable fees and expenses".

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i have just come off the phone to the supervisor at the council tax office. The head of recovery didnt call me back so i called again and got passed onto the supervisor who stated the following;

 

She is not aware of any details in the contract that allows bailiffs to make two levy charges, she said she does not know any details of the contract and nor does anyone else at the office. She said she would have thought that a levy can be charged on each account, she then spoke to the information help desk or something and they too said, they thought that levys can be charged on each account. My thoughts after speaking to the supervisor is that nobody at the council tax office knows the details of the contract written between B&S and the council. The supervisor also stated that, all they do is contract a bailiff firm stating who owes money, the bailiff firm then collects the debt and charges whatever they wish.

 

The supervisor then stated, she had made a note for the manager for council tax to give me a ring as he may be able to enlighten me further.

 

SUMMARY:

 

At this moment in time i have found out that the bailiff who removed my van was not under license from B&S according to the search carried out this morning by the OFT, the search was carried out just using the bailiffs name and company(B&S).

 

I have also found out that i should have been informed that the van was going to be removed enabling me to remove my tools, i was not informed of a date for the removal of the van.

 

I have also found out that the council have no idea as to what bailiffs charge, they just pass them the debt, the bailiffs recover the amount and charge the recipient whatever they choose to.

 

At this moment in time i am none of the wiser as to what to do.

 

Also, is there any questions that i could ask the council tax manager other than whether or not it is written in their agreement about charging seperate levys?

 

cheers and thanks for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following is a Regulation 46 Complaint Letter. I have adapted this for you using the information provided in your posts. This can be further changed or adapted as you wish.

I will post back here later to advise what you need to do with this document.

The Chief Clerk

XXX Magistrates Court

 

 

October 15th 2008.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Council Ref: xxxxxx

 

I am writing to request that you issue a Summons against Nottingham City Council by virtue of Regulation 46 of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regs 1992 as a matter of urgency.

 

I am aggrieved by the levy carried out by Bristow & Sutor (Certificated Bailiffs) on 14th October 2008 for the following reason:

 

  • I am a bricklayer by trade, and the levy was against a transit van that contained all of my work tools and which I believe is a “tool of the trade” for my use personally in the course of my employment. I am unable to work without this vehicle and its contents. The vehicle has been taken the vehicle pound by the bailiff after they removed the gates from my driveway. I am informed by them that the vehicle will be sold within 5 days.

  • The bailiff was enforcing two separate Liability Orders on behalf of Nottingham City Council and has charged a sum of £915 for the removal of this van which has been broken down as follows:

Levy Fee 1: £42.00

Levy Fee 2: £49.00

Attending to Levy: £67.00

Attending to remove: £360

Removal: £380

Contractors Fees: £175

Head H Fee: £24.50

 

 

I am enclosing a copy of the Notice of Seizure that was left by the bailiff than confirms the charges applied to my account.

 

I trust that this information will be sufficient and please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information.

 

Yours faithfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi tomtubby and thank you for taking the time to assemble a 46 complaint document. It is much appreciated to say the least.

 

I have now modified and saved the document and await further instructions from you.

 

I would also like to ask, would this document slow down the process of the bailiffs forwarding my van for auction?

 

cheers and thanks for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi folks, i'm trying to keep calm but at the same time i am starting to panic a little, time may be running out for me. The van was taken on tuesday and its now thursday, the bailiffs claim the van will go up for auction after 5 days...

 

I'm sitting with my fingers crossed...

 

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi TT, cheers and thanks, i do appreciate you taking time out to help me out and i also appreciate that you must be very busy too, so i'll just sit tight.

 

I would also like to ask, is therre anything else i can do regarding the bailiff that removed my van, he did not appear on the register during the search carried out by the OFT ?

 

Cheers and thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...