Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fredrickson Int. Debt Collectors wont give up?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5679 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

For the past month or two my sister has been receiving calls from Fredrickson International. They are demanding over £250 for a phone bill which they say the Carphone Warehouse passed on. After contacting Carphone Warehouse they have told me that only £87 is owed direct to them. As the contract is in my sister’s name but the phone is mine is it getting on both our nerves.

 

Giving as much info to you all I will state what has happened so far.

 

Firstly: They have been ringing my house (still living with parents) asking to speak to my sister regarding this debt. This of course is getting my dad worried and he is getting annoyed with the constant phone calls and is worried the house will get black listed if me and my sister don’t comply?????

 

Secondly: I myself have spoke to Carphone warehouse and they have told that Fredrickson Int. are not on the account to take money but also state they do not talk to them only pass the debt on.

 

Thirdly: The debt remaining is £87 but Frecrickson Int. is asking for over £250? whyyy??

 

And Finally: the last call from Frederickson Int. was quite rude and harassing. I answered the phone saying that this debt is not owed and that if they want to find out proof (as that’s what they want) they should speak to Carphone Warehouse not me. She said that’s not her job to do that and that I have to get written proof.. With the female on the other ending saying she shouldn’t be talking to me anyway (but was) she asked could you let your sister know and get her to contact us....my reply was that’s not my job either, then she just hanged up...

 

Can anyone guide me or help me on this matter and the main reason this is getting annoying is the phone calls my dad is receiving day in day out.

 

Any help or info would be greatly appreciated

 

Many thanks

 

Will

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Will.

 

There is a letter you could send them regarding the phone calls.....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/37006-harassment-telephone-response-letter.html

 

To find out the score, regarding what charges have been added to your account..........

 

Under the Data Protection Act you are entitled to having all information held about you supplied under a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - a Subject Access Request. This requires the network to provide a copy of everything the network has on its files about you, from your dealings with customer services to copies of all the bills ever issued to you.

 

There can be a charge for this (the maximum fee is £10) but many networks have been known to waive the charge, or even charge less. Some may not even know what to do if you send them £10 and ask for a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), they often just credit the £10 to your account and ignore the SAR request. It is often easier to ask for the information, and advise IF there is a charge, you'll send the payment by return.

 

Once you have the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) information (which can often run to hundreds of A4 sheets), containing a 'screen grab' of your account data taken from their computer files. You can use this to identify any anomalies in your account, or unfair charges. You can also refer to this data as the reason of your complaint and ask for the fees/costs to be refunded. If they do not, the SAR document then becomes irrefutable evidence in any court action (as it was provided by the defender). If the company charges you a fee for the SAR, add the cost of this to your claim also.

 

Send this to Carphone Warehouse.

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/subject_access_-_guide_for_data_subjects.pdf

 

If there are any unfair charges on the account, start the process of claiming them back, this will put the account into dispute and there can be no more action taken on the account until the dispute is fully resolved.

 

As you do not seem to be argueing about the £87 being owed to Carphone Warehouse.I would get in touch with them, and try to arrange a payment plan to pay the £87.

If you can do this it would save a lot of hassle, regarding getting chased by the Debt Collectors.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi maroondevil52

 

Thankyou for your reply. I will be sending the letter of harrassment on my lunch break. I have just got of the phone to Carphone Warehouse again and they have said the relations to Fredrickson Int and them do not appear on their records Only Roxbourghe which is who I payed off and is cleared with them now.

 

Carphone Warehouse are saying talk to them about it but Fredrickson Int. are saying to them about it. Its backwards and forwads all the time and no matter what I say to either they only give me the same reply.

 

How can I prove to them that I dont owe them this amount? Is the best bet to send of the S.A.R letter as you said to Carphone Warehouse, asking for all the information and seeing where this amount has come from and how Fredrickson Int. have got my details when Carphone wharehouse have no relations to the regarding my acoount?

 

Kind Regards

 

 

Will

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have the £87 I would pay Carphone Warehouse directly and cut Fredericksons out of the loop.

 

The cretin at Fredericksons who told you that you must get proof of how much you actually owe is talking out of her rear orifice. They are the people chasing the alleged debt so they MUST prove it actually exists. Obviously they missed that bit on their training Course.

 

Be careful of Freds though because they will pass it on to their tame solicitors Bryan Carter who will issue court papers at the drop of a hat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will,

 

I'd send the SAR, this should show all activity on the account.

Though, It's does bug me, you having to pay £10.

 

As ODC say's give Fredericksons a huge body swerve, well on the phone, anyway.

 

You could send them the 'prove it' letter, see what they come back with.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Again, as ODC has pointed out, you have to prove nothing, It's Fredericksons that say your due a certain amount, so they have to prove it.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...