Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please can you post a link to his Facebook account
    • It was a facebook post. The number he lives at is 41, he had 5 other cars, and another van all packed into his front garden. He also had a tow truck parked out side. All the other cars and van looked in very good condition. So I'm assuming he is a back street dealer.  
    • Okay. I suggest that you begin by getting a written confirmation of the evidence you have – in other words a written statement from your customer confirming that he did order from you, what it was she ordered, how she paid, that the delivery failed even though she waited in for XXX days. Did she receive any email notification of the forthcoming delivery? If so you want to get hold of a copy of that. Did you reimburse her? Confirmation from her that she was reimbursed by you £XXX. Any other evidence you can get all statements from anybody – get it in writing. Get it now so that you are fully prepared and you don't need to go back and ask later after you have committed funds to bringing a claim. Draft a letter of claim setting out your case and what you are asking for – and a timeline of 14 days after which you will issue the claim. Don't expect them to respond to this with any thing positive. This is simply a formality. You aren't bluffing. On day 15 you will issue the claim. If you have any doubts and we stop now.
    • Okay. There is see some learning to do here – but we will manage in the end. For the moment please can you tell me about the advertisement. Where was it advertised? Have you noticed any other advertisements from the same person – Thomas Stone. You have given a road name – but what number in the road please
    • I am trying. I'm no good with tech 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can BT Do This........


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Couldn't agree more. We deal with them all the time where I work and they're a shower. And that's on a good day (if they indeed have such a thing)!

 

First Direct - Settled in full 01/07

Capital One - Settled in full 06/10/06

MINT - Settled In Full 30/08/06

HSBC - Settled in Full 15/12/06

Barclays - - Settled in Full 29/11/06

Morgan Stanley - Settled In Full 03/10/06

MBNA - Settled In Full 23/09

American Express - Settled in Full 30/11/06 via bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just received an email from BT and Wickerman my phone is a DECT Philips phone.

 

For the enginners report,

You will need to include the £10.00 (inc VAT) fee by cheque made payable to 'BT plc' for this request with your name and address and your account number.

 

Please note that your requst may take up to 40 days for a reply under the Data Protection Act.

 

Also in relation to the charges for the engineer call out your charges have been maintained as the lightening has went down the electricity line through your phone to the BT Socket causing the damage. Please note that in a time of lightening you should disconnect all electrical goods.

 

I realise that this is not the response that you may be expecting and I hope that this information clarifies this matter for you. If you should have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact the Faults department on 0800 800 151.

 

Thank you for contacting BT, enjoy the rest of your day.

 

 

Hows about that then, enjoy the rest of your day, yeah right :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also in relation to the charges for the engineer call out your charges have been maintained as the lightening has went down the electricity line through your phone to the BT Socket causing the damage. Please note that in a time of lightening you should disconnect all electrical goods.

What a load of rubbish. Lightning coming in through your electricity supply would have blown out your consumer unit for a start and gone no further. Otherwise, your phone would certainly not be working!

 

I'm not sure if it's worth doing the Data Protection Act request (which you could add to any claim) or just going straight for them with their explanation so far and the fact that it's obviously wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So their engineer reckons a Philips DECT single line phone melted your master socket. We have engineers like that ringing our tech desk from time to time, and they're are a great source of amusement.

 

I'm not sure where you should take this, but I'd start with CAB just to see what procedures exist for escalating matters of this nature. I reiterate, there's no way on earth that your phone would do any damage to your socket, unless you mindlessly vandalised it by wiring the socket directly into the mains.

 

Keep us posted in the meantime.

 

First Direct - Settled in full 01/07

Capital One - Settled in full 06/10/06

MINT - Settled In Full 30/08/06

HSBC - Settled in Full 15/12/06

Barclays - - Settled in Full 29/11/06

Morgan Stanley - Settled In Full 03/10/06

MBNA - Settled In Full 23/09

American Express - Settled in Full 30/11/06 via bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not strictly speaking true it wouldnt have been a direct lightning strike but a strike further upstream on the power lines could cause a very brief spike which could be enough to damage things but without tripping anything out.

 

We had something similar a few years back workmen dug thru a mains cable and sent a 450 volt spike down the mains which fried everything in those houses, you have to remember that all a switch or trip does is introduce a small break in the circuit a small power surge caused by the above or lightning would just jump the gap the same way it does in a spark plug.

 

Also the DECT phone base unit is plugged into both the mains and the phone so it is entirely possible for this to have happened as BT state BUT there is no way on this earth if this happened that the phone would still be working its just rubbish if BT want to play this way then take the phone to an electrical repair shop and get them to write a report saying theres nothing wrong with it and present that to BT to contradict their own engineers report.

 

The simple fact of the matter is I seriously doubt BT could prove it was your DECT phone even if it was that that caused the problem if it had had a power surge and dumped the excess voltage to ground as they insist the phone would be knackered.

 

Wait for the reports but thats what I would do next get a report on the state of your phone to counter the BT engineers.

 

To be fair BT engineers (the kind who come out to your premises for this kind of thing not the specialists) are not electrical experts they do not have any kind of HND/HNC/BSc nor do they have any of the following City & Guilds 2391 Inspection, Testing and Certification of Installations, and City & Guilds 16th Edition IEE Wiring Regulations (2381) City & Guilds In-service Inspection and Testing of Electrical Equipment (2377 - portable appliance testing), alarm and fire detection systems and emergency lighting.

 

So I would also question whether the BT engineer was actually qualified to make a statement about something that is mains powered when they generally have no qualifications in that area (unless you got "lucky" and got one who is an ex sparky)

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Please note that in a time of lightening you should disconnect all electrical goods.'

 

So every time a thunderstorm comes over I have to rush around unplugging every single electrical appliance, including the fridge/freezer? Funny, never heard that one before...

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just an update, I've written to BT asking them for the engineers report, so we wait and see.

And apparently, Yes, it is our responsibility to unplug all appliances in a thunderstorm, although I don't know one person who actually does it, and who would ever think of unplugging their phone.

BT are weird............

 

Thanks to all who've helped me.

 

Marie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...