Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
    • Yeah only £10 so may as well just get it done. When it comes to liaising with the police and bargaining before it hopefully goes to court. How does that happen? Via email? Phone call etc
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome/Cohens - case withdrawn ***WOO-HOO ***


Prudence
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4330 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 629
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Can anyone suggest anything we can do further to get Welcome Finance off our credit record? With great help on here (especially postggj), we had a CCJ set aside then their Solicitors Cohens 'Discontinued' before it went to trial. However, that still leaves us with a big blot on our credit file (no Default tho) of missed payments showing which WF continually update. We have written to WF but to no avail.

 

We have been advised to write directly to the CRAs and demand they remove the data. Will they do this? I am about to write to them but wondering what others' thoughts on this are? Any help or suggestions as to where I can get further help on this will be much appreciated.

Thanks, Pru

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the payments missed or are they incorrect entries?

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for your reply James. Briefly, the arrears accrued after being refused a PPI claim ('pre-existing condition' which we disputed), then the arrears turned into a CCJ. After help on here we managed to get the CCJ set aside due to PPI issues (included interest in the loan etc), faulty Default Notice and incorrectly headed Agreement. WF never showed up at Court, we had several 'stays' and in the end, WF's solicitors sent Notice of Discontinuance the day before the Court date. We have recently had contact from a DCA and have written to tell them it has already been subject to litigation and WF withdrew. We wrote to WF demanding they remove the entries a few weeks ago but have had no reply.

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesnt surprise me regarding the default etc with Welcome.

 

Did you miss the monthly payments though which you were previously making and are the entries late payment markers?

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

The dispute went on for some time, at first we were attempting half payments then stopped paying them after they would never agree to any reduced payment plan, and would not answer our correspondence. We paid them on time and full payments for about 6 months at the start, but the start of the record of payments on the credit report is a mixture of 0, 1, 2 ! They have down 6's for the past 10 months. The Discontinuance occurred a year ago.

I was told the judge has the power to order them to remove the data but when we went to the hearing, the day after receiving Notice of Discontinuance, the judge said he did not have the power & we would have to take it up elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree they were wrong over the ccj and default notice etc but you have stopped making payments on a credit agreement therefore any financial institution holds the right to report late and missed payments.

 

While you may not agree with them not agreeing to reduced payments or them refusing your ppi claim im afraid you still have to maintain the payments as per the agreement.

 

That been said if you were making full payments for the first 6 months this should be reflected on your file.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply, however if a credit agreement is not headed correctly in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act and is rendered unenforceable because of that and/or other issues, then surely they do NOT have the right to publish this data.

Also how do you correct misinformation on your file (ie our first 6 months of payments) when the other party (ie WF) are not willing to co-operate. Are all the cards in their hands? Do we not have any legal right whatsoever? Are there any laws governing the publishing of such information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who has declared it un-enforceable? This can only be done by the courts.

 

As for the first 6 months all you can do is try and take it up with the CRA's failing that threaten them with legal action for them producing inaccurate data.

 

ICO is just a waste of time and takes months even years. Going through the courts is more often than not the only language they understand.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update, wrote to MKRR asking for a copy of the Deed of Assignment and to tell them that this has already been the subject of litigation, where WF 'Discontinued'. No reply as yet. Wrote to WF a month ago demanding removal of data and received a reply only today to say "Your account has been sold onto Trade Pro".

I can't understand how they could have a sold an account that has already been to Court.

I still have not received any reply to CPR18 request (to WF) over a year ago nor a Subject Access Request to Direct (re PPI) also over a year ago. Shall I pursue the PPI? It seems WF included the PPI in the amount of our credit for one thing. If so, what is the next step please?

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you need to confirm trade pro, mkrr who or whatever they are calling themself and demand if the account has been assigned equitable or absolute by the law of property act 1925

 

go on the ppi or any other micky mouse insurance

Link to post
Share on other sites

equitable means they can send it back to welcome if they fail to collect

 

absolute means they are lumbered with the account

 

warts and all

 

the account is illegal anyway as welcome would be prohibited from selling it on as they can now take no legal action on recovery

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Pru, I have read your thread from the beginning and was cheering you on all the way through. I can't believe this has come back to haunt you, but at least this time you know you can do it.

 

post ggj could you possibly have a quick look at my thread Being taken to court...please help I'm scared Re: MBNA. Not all of it just the last page regarding the Tomlin order. I just need some advice please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mollybe! Good luck with your case, I will have a look through your thread... looks like it's as long as mine (just had a quick look - hope you have a lovely birthday and that your pamper day gives you even more stamina to stand up to these villains!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is only a 'monthly status' which just gives a row of payment markers (there were more of them than I showed - chopped off several at the start of the account). You can see a copy of the report on the previous page #273

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Take It The Account Is Still Under The Name Welcome Finance Not

Mkrr Or What Ever

 

Seems Mkrr Need One Of My Letters

 

I Take It You Have Still Got The Order From The Court Saying Discontinued

Link to post
Share on other sites

We obtained this credit report about a couple of weeks ago. Yes it was under Welcome's name (but it says they last updated it March 2010 which I think was before they passed to MKRR). We wrote to WF demanding they remove the data (great letter from emancole) but they just wrote back to say they sold the account to TradePro and we should refer complaints to them. We have written to TradePro/MKRR or whatever, to say this has already been subject of litigation & to stop any harrassment, & detailing our costs for any further letters, calls etc. No response from them yet. But that still leaves us in limbo with the credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...