Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Just to check I understand things right, he moved to a nursing home, you then kept paying the rent for a period of time whilst you sorted his belongings. You have asked to give notice and asked for backdated payments of rent from when you first asked which went ignored? They are still taking rent payments.   Have I understood correct?   If I've got anything wrong please correct me.
    • I contacted Sanctury housing in August 2023 after informing them my father in law who had Dementia had moved into a Nursing home December 2022. We kept the flat for 8 months until such a time we could accomodate some of his furniture that my wife wanted to keep. I contacted them in August 2023 to let them know the situation by email as I was the named person that could speak on his behalf. I informed them that we had left it to late for POT and were seeing a solicitor for Deputyship of his financies. I asked them what information would they need in order to give notice on the flat and we could provide details of his condition and nursing home. This went ignored I left it a month and then called them October 2023. I was promised a call back from a manager over the next few days. This never happened and it was end of November when I contacted them again and they had no record of me calling them. I explained the email and again I was told the local manager to the area would call me. This never happened and I ended up emailing them in January 2024 with a copy of the email from August. Again this went ignored and I had explained to them that we couldn't just go to the bank and stop the DD as we had tried. This email again went ignored. I then had a letter written to our home address in February asking us to get in contact with them (local manager) as they were concerend nobody was living in the flat. He had an email address so I copied in the last 2 emails to say I had been trying to give notice since August 2023. I also stated that I would like the rent that was paid from August 2023 refunded back to his account as I had officially tried to give notice then and it went ignored. He replied to us about wanting to look at the flat then notice could be given once he had contacted the nursing home to confirm he was actually living there now. Notice was giving for the 22 March 2024 and this would be when rent would stop and no further payment would be taken by this point. The fact I asked to be back dated went ignored. I have since noticed on 2 banks statement for April and May that they are still taking Rent payments of £501 from his bank. Further to this which seems very strange. He was with Eon Next for his utility bill again we were having problems getting this stopped as they needed a named person on his account which there wasn't one despite me managing his online account for him. I didn't check the email address that often that I used to set it up and went to check as noticed the credit he had built up with not living there was all getting refunded in February. The email said £600 would be refunded to his account with a (sorry you are leaving us message) but how can he leave as nobody but himself had access to speak with them. I also noticed the lady in the flat above him had a letter from her bank sent to his address with his address details but his name which was dated 4th March well before we had given notice and it said (thank you for giving us your new address details) we have set all this up for your account.   So Sanctuary housing must have been aware he wasn't living there from the ignored emails for the lady above to start changing address details to move into his flat before the housing manager had even got in contact to ask if anyone was living there. What I basically want to know his do we have any legal standing to claim the rent back from when I first contacted them in August 2023? There is roughly £3000 to come back  
    • lowell letter = we've mugged you once - why are you not paying this other debt....😎
    • i see you are posting this all over the internet too. here you say it was returned by the safety camera dept UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please? WWW.FTLA.UK UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please?  
    • I see what you mean. I will wait till the 8 weeks is up and then take it up with FOS. Before I do will be on with some more details on the SAR. Thank you once again. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car serviced by Audi last week now I have a suspected Head gasket failure! PLEASE HELP


S.O.L
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, just reading your posts, firstly just a quick explanation what the headgasket does, in the top of the engine there are various holes which carry water and oil, these have to be kept apart from the high pressure from the cylinders when the engine fires, so a large seal with holes is placed between the top and middle of the engine, as your car has just done 16k it unlikely to have failed with age, nor does it fail with running low on coolant, it fails due to overheating or badly built engine which the head (top of the engine ) is slightly warped or has not been tightened down correctly. This has nothing to do with Audi servicing the car as it cannot be checked in a service, the only time they might be responsable is, if it overheated with them on a test drive, secondly the process replacing it is easy and nothing like the 5k you were quoted, the process is, removal of the cylinder head, strip the cylinder head down enough to get it re-skimmed, ( re-surfaced so the base is flat ) re assembled with new headgasket, This can be done by any reputable garage not neccesarly a audi dealer as their labour charges can be much higher, estemate £500 tops, ask around for quotes, remember to include oil and coolant. Regards.

 

£500 for a V6 Engine? What about the Catalytic converter etc?:confused:

 

So as far as you're concerned, there is no way Audi could have been responsible other than through an overzealous test drive?

 

Would the check they perform for leaks not have flagged up a problem?

 

thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

sol- just found the a4's up to 2004 had a coolant blower fan module fault, this caused overheating, the dealer should be able to read the fault if it has occered.

 

thx Riget.......the thing is no warning lights have come on since it was serviced and the coolant temp has gradually rose to 90 and stayed there both times I have driven it since the service. if the blower fan was the culprit then would it not have affected the coolant temp?

 

There was a full diagnostic check as part of the service......would this not have been picked up by diagnostics?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the temp go to 90 before the service?

It's not likely to be able to diagnose the error by this forum, but for me the error happened at the service, as you have now said the coolant was changed that seems the likely cause.

The diagnostics check should find if there was an electrical failure, as no error was found at the service, then it's unlikely to be the reason for failure of the gasket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the temp go to 90 before the service?

It's not likely to be able to diagnose the error by this forum, but for me the error happened at the service, as you have now said the coolant was changed that seems the likely cause.

The diagnostics check should find if there was an electrical failure, as no error was found at the service, then it's unlikely to be the reason for failure of the gasket.

 

Yes. No temp issues before the service....in fact the car ran totally fine. When I picked it up after the service, it felt no different.

 

I really don't think I can discount the fact that the coolant change by Audi mechanic could have caused this.......

 

Another thing that was odd was how much pressure there was in the cooler tank when I opened it to top it up.....I had to do it gently as it felt like the cap was going to fly off!:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a legal person but I think you should ask audi questions, the fact it's only 4 years old, low mileage with service history, and it happened just after the service.

But I can't check it over the net so you'll have to let them look, it is possible something else happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a legal person but I think you should ask audi questions, the fact it's only 4 years old, low mileage with service history, and it happened just after the service.

But I can't check it over the net so you'll have to let them look, it is possible something else happened.

 

thx for all your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a remote possibility when performing a coolant change, if done incorrectly, that head gasket failure can occur. Antifreeze has a creeping action and can find a path where plain water cannot. It is essential when replacing coolant into an empty system that neat antifreeze is not added at the start. Due to it's aggressive nature it is possible (albeit rare) that it may creep between the head gasket and block. The correct way is to use plain water first which must be added up to about a quarter of the coolant capacity. Next a mixture of water and antifreeze should be used to fill the system up. This way the effect of the antifreeze is at all times diluted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The head gasket most certainly can go by running low on coolant.

£500 tops, is a bit light, we don't even know what engine this has, could be a v6, and I can't see anybody rebuilding the top end for £500.

 

S.O.L. what engine is it?

 

Have never had a headgasket go yet on a car that has been low on coolant ! I have seen plenty overheat due to being low on coolant, which in return causes headgasket failure ! secondly, the top end shouldnt need rebuilding, just the parts re-fitting that was removed to enable it to be skimmed, Have done loads of v6 engines, head off,re-skimmed and back on within the day...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have never had a headgasket go yet on a car that has been low on coolant ! I have seen plenty overheat due to being low on coolant, which in return causes headgasket failure !

 

Same difference to be fair.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same difference to be fair.

 

I agree, but just because your coolant system needs topping up doesnt automaticly mean headgasket failure!

it usually works the opposite way round, the pressure from the headgasket failure blows the water out, agreed ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually - but didnt in my case, was failure in the coolant system(blown radiator) that caused the gasket to go. Therefore, can go either way ;)

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How could they cause the head gasket to fail? By his own admission the OP states "it was very low on coolant" ie not "empty" just very low, I fail to see any case for negligence or incorrect servicing.

 

The only reasons I can see is if the garage had changed the antifreeze and not "bled" the system correctly....which can cause localised overheating and head gasket failure, Or that the vehicle had never had antifreeze in it's system from new and electrolytic corrosion had "eaten" the all important sealing surface.......

 

£3000 seems a little harsh! Is that for a complete new engine?

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an Audi A6 and although I am having problems after problems... any "engine" issues show up on board

For instance, if it was low on coolant to beyond the minimum amount needed, I would expect it to tell me.

I also have a "check" button which cycles (as it does in the background on starting the car) through the sensor checks and I'm almost 99% certain coolant is one of them.

Have you got something like this on the A4?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fail to see any case for negligence or incorrect servicing.

 

The only reasons I can see is if the garage had changed the antifreeze and not "bled" the system correctly....which can cause localised overheating and head gasket failure,

 

Think you answered youself there,

That is the best reason I could quess at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an Audi A6 and although I am having problems after problems... any "engine" issues show up on board

For instance, if it was low on coolant to beyond the minimum amount needed, I would expect it to tell me.

I also have a "check" button which cycles (as it does in the background on starting the car) through the sensor checks and I'm almost 99% certain coolant is one of them.

Have you got something like this on the A4?

 

I too have the check button which I use frequently. Even when I press it now it tells me everything is ok.......whereas the cloud of white smoke coming out the exhaust suggests otherwise! Also I take those electronic checks with a pinch of salt as they rely on the fact that the electronics are working correctly.....if one of the sensors go....you wouldn't know until something went wrong unless of course you check things manually too.

Edited by S.O.L
Link to post
Share on other sites

How could they cause the head gasket to fail? By his own admission the OP states "it was very low on coolant" ie not "empty" just very low, I fail to see any case for negligence or incorrect servicing.

 

The only reasons I can see is if the garage had changed the antifreeze and not "bled" the system correctly....which can cause localised overheating and head gasket failure, Or that the vehicle had never had antifreeze in it's system from new and electrolytic corrosion had "eaten" the all important sealing surface.......

 

£3000 seems a little harsh! Is that for a complete new engine?

 

The facts are this: My car has very low mileage and ran fine (never overheated or low on coolant) prior to the service. 4 days after it was serviced by Audi, the coolant level is extremely low (well below min) and I have a blown head gasket :eek: therefore I can not rule out the fact that they may have been responsible for my current plight! However, I am not certain that they had anything to do with it either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think you answered youself there,

That is the best reason I could quess at.

 

that's my guess too as to what may have caused this although I am quite aware of the fact that I could be wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the facts is that nothing is perfect and a head gasket "has" to fail sometime.....Personally I'd check the bill to see if I was charged for an antifreeze change (then I'd take them to small claims court if they had and find out if they know engines and their job) as obviously they hadn't purged the air out correctly .....You would maybe task an independent engineer to ascertain what went wrong.

Edited by Nemesis_Drake
Missed something out

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The coolant sensor is usually in the expansion tank, This would be full even if the engine was low (air lock) also it's likely to only have one temperature sensor, being a v6 if the air lock was in the bank with no temp sensor you would not have had an overheating warning, then after leaving it overnight the coolant in the expansion tank would have gone back into the engine.

Maybe?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The coolant sensor is usually in the expansion tank, This would be full even if the engine was low (air lock) also it's likely to only have one temperature sensor, being a v6 if the air lock was in the bank with no temp sensor you would not have had an overheating warning, then after leaving it overnight the coolant in the expansion tank would have gone back into the engine.

Maybe?

 

This is exactly what I am thinking

Link to post
Share on other sites

>>06: Inspect cooling system for leaks and test antifreeze strength

 

This is key. Was it a visual check or a 'proper check'. By this I mean the system is pressurised. A pressure gauge with an integral hand pump is fitted (via an adapter) to teh expansion tank and pumped up to typically 12-15 psi.

If the reading drops after a few minutes then that indicates trouble. Also, how on earth would a visual check detect a leak (in say) the heater matrix which is usually buried under the dashboard. If I had an 'exotic' car I'd use FORLIFE, this is usually red but changes yellow at the first hint of gasket failure (combustion gases cause this). Also, was the system refilled, if so, was it bled correctly thus preventing air pockets (which would have normally been occupied with coolant).

 

My sister had a newish BWM once and was serviced at a main dealer, when she got it back, she asked me to investigate a rumbling back axle. Investigation showed they'd swapped the spare for the nearside rear but the nuts were only finger tight !. Her hubby phoned them and was fobbed off with a 'must've been vandals yarn'. They didn't even want to see the car to check if the soft alloy wheel was damaged at its mounting holes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I wonder why the last owner sold this car. Failure of the head gasket at this mileage is unusual. If you contact the servicing Audi dealer (details in service record) they may be able to supply more detailed information on each service, or any reported faults. The service history should be carefully checked to corroborate mileage - the repairs to bearings that you quote is unusual. I would look for indications that this car had problems prior to sale. Failure of the head gasket is generally down to manufacturing defect (faulty seal/gasket) or overheating producing head warping. I would also contact Audi UK and ask if they have seen this problem on this type of engine before. If the leak on the gasket at time of service was minor, then it would be difficult to detect,prior to major failure.

 

Good luck,

 

Jonnie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I wonder why the last owner sold this car. Failure of the head gasket at this mileage is unusual. If you contact the servicing Audi dealer (details in service record) they may be able to supply more detailed information on each service, or any reported faults. The service history should be carefully checked to corroborate mileage - the repairs to bearings that you quote is unusual. I would look for indications that this car had problems prior to sale. Failure of the head gasket is generally down to manufacturing defect (faulty seal/gasket) or overheating producing head warping. I would also contact Audi UK and ask if they have seen this problem on this type of engine before. If the leak on the gasket at time of service was minor, then it would be difficult to detect,prior to major failure.

 

Good luck,

 

Jonnie

 

thx Jonnie.....

 

I too was suspicious so checked the history with the main dealer and seems to be fine....nothing came up to suggest otherwise. This problem is uncommon according to Audi, However, the wheel bearing issue is less uncommon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Head gasket damage is basically caused by overheating. Specifically, is almost always caused by cooling system failure, or (sometimes) lack of oil.

 

I'm no expert at all but I have a question - I thought this (above) was not always the case, and that HGF could cause overheating as the coolant is boiled away by the leaking of the head gasket, i.e. HGF can cause overheating rather than the other way round ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...