Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak tried to stop the public seeing this report. Rishi Sunak ordered to publish secret analysis showing Universal Credit cut impact - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK As Chancellor, Rishi Sunak ignored pleas from campaigners including footballer Marcus Rashford by scrapping the £20-per-week Universal Credit...  
    • A full-scale strike at the firm could have an impact on the global supply chains of electronics.View the full article
    • He was one of four former top executives from Sam Bankman-Fried's firms to plead guilty to charges.View the full article
    • The private submersible industry was shaken after the implosion of the OceanGate Titan sub last year.View the full article
    • further polished WS using above suggestions and also included couple of more modifications highlighted in orange are those ok to include?   Background   1.1  The Defendant received the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) on the 06th of January 2020 following the vehicle being parked at Arla Old Dairy, South Ruislip on the 05th of December 2019.   Unfair PCN   2.1  On 19th December 2023 the Defendant sent the Claimant's solicitors a CPR request.  As shown in Exhibit 1 (pages 7-13) sent by the solicitors the signage displayed in their evidence clearly shows a £60.00 parking charge notice (which will be reduced to £30 if paid within 14 days of issue).  2.2  Yet the PCN sent by the Claimant is for a £100.00 parking charge notice (reduced to £60 if paid within 30 days of issue).   2.3        The Claimant relies on signage to create a contract.  It is unlawful for the Claimant to write that the charge is £60 on their signs and then send demands for £100.    2.4        The unlawful £100 charge is also the basis for the Claimant's Particulars of Claim.  No Locus Standi  3.1  I do not believe a contract with the landowner, that is provided following the defendant’s CPR request, gives MET Parking Services a right to bring claims in their own name. Definition of “Relevant contract” from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4,  2 [1] means a contract Including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land between the driver and a person who is-   (a) the owner or occupier of the land; or   (b) Authorised, under or by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land. According to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44   For a contract to be valid, it requires a director from each company to sign and then two independent witnesses must confirm those signatures.   3.2  The Defendant requested to see such a contract in the CPR request.  The fact that no contract has been produced with the witness signatures present means the contract has not been validly executed. Therefore, there can be no contract established between MET Parking Services and the motorist. Even if “Parking in Electric Bay” could form a contract (which it cannot), it is immaterial. There is no valid contract.  Illegal Conduct – No Contract Formed   4.1 At the time of writing, the Claimant has failed to provide the following, in response to the CPR request from myself.   4.2        The legal contract between the Claimant and the landowner (which in this case is Standard Life Investments UK) to provide evidence that there is an agreement in place with landowner with the necessary authority to issue parking charge notices and to pursue payment by means of litigation.   4.3 Proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and country Planning Act 1990. Lack of planning permission is a criminal offence under this Act and no contract can be formed where criminality is involved.   4.4        I also do not believe the claimant possesses these documents.   No Keeper Liability   5.1        The defendant was not the driver at the time and date mentioned in the PCN and the claimant has not established keeper liability under schedule 4 of the PoFA 2012. In this matter, the defendant puts it to the claimant to produce strict proof as to who was driving at the time.   5.2 The claimant in their Notice To Keeper also failed to comply with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 section 9[2][f] while mentioning “the right to recover from the keeper so much of that parking charge as remains unpaid” where they did not include statement “(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met)”.     5.3         The claimant did not mention parking period, times on the photographs are separate from the PCN and in any case are that arrival and departure times not the parking period since their times include driving to and from the parking space as a minimum and can include extra time to allow pedestrians and other vehicles to pass in front.    Protection of Freedoms Act 2012   The notice must -   (a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;  22. In the persuasive judgement K4GF167G - Premier Park Ltd v Mr Mathur - Horsham County Court – 5 January 2024 it was on this very point that the judge dismissed this claim.  5.4  A the PCN does not comply with the Act the Defendant as keeper is not liable.  No Breach of Contract   6.1       No breach of contract occurred because the PCN and contract provided as part of the defendant’s CPR request shows different post code, PCN shows HA4 0EY while contract shows HA4 0FY. According to PCN defendant parked on HA4 0EY which does not appear to be subject to the postcode covered by the contract.  6.2         The entrance sign does not mention anything about there being other terms inside the car park so does not offer a contract which makes it only an offer to treat,  Interest  7.1  It is unreasonable for the Claimant to delay litigation for  Double Recovery   7.2  The claim is littered with made-up charges.  7.3  As noted above, the Claimant's signs state a £60 charge yet their PCN is for £100.  7.4  As well as the £100 parking charge, the Claimant seeks recovery of an additional £70.  This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims.  7.5 Since 2019, many County Courts have considered claims in excess of £100 to be an abuse of process leading to them being struck out ab initio. An example, in the Caernarfon Court in VCS v Davies, case No. FTQZ4W28 on 4th September 2019, District Judge Jones-Evans stated “Upon it being recorded that District Judge Jones- Evans has over a very significant period of time warned advocates (...) in many cases of this nature before this court that their claim for £60 is unenforceable in law and is an abuse of process and is nothing more than a poor attempt to go behind the decision of the Supreme Court v Beavis which inter alia decided that a figure of £160 as a global sum claimed in this case would be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss and therefore unenforceable in law and if the practice continued, he would treat all cases as a claim for £160 and therefore a penalty and unenforceable in law it is hereby declared (…) the claim is struck out and declared to be wholly without merit and an abuse of process.”  7.6 In Claim Nos. F0DP806M and F0DP201T, District Judge Taylor echoed earlier General Judgment or Orders of District Judge Grand, stating ''It is ordered that the claim is struck out as an abuse of process. The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverabl15e under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgment in Parking Eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4)) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998...''  7.7 In the persuasive case of G4QZ465V - Excel Parking Services Ltd v Wilkinson – Bradford County Court -2 July 2020 (Exhibit 4) the judge had decided that Excel had won. However, due to Excel adding on the £60 the Judge dismissed the case.  7.8        The addition of costs not previously specified on signage are also in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Schedule 2, specifically paras 6, 10 and 14.   7.9        It is the Defendant’s position that the Claimant in this case has knowingly submitted inflated costs and thus the entire claim should be similarly struck out in accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 3.3(4).   In Conclusion   8.1        I invite the court to dismiss the claim.  Statement of Truth  I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Eversheds County Court Paperwork / **SUCCESS**


goonerhenry
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4810 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have an old MBNA credit card which after severe financial difficulty i defaulted on around 16 months ago, at the time i agreed to pay a redueced fee to which to date i have never missed a payment, this was agreed with a compnay called eversheds, recently i received a phone call from eversheds saying that unless i paid the debt of in full or agreed to hugely increased monthly payment, they would be pursueing me through the county court and getting a charging order against my property, i received the paperwork last saturday through normal post not recorded, but the claimant was arrow global not mbna, to my knowledge i dont have a credit agreement with arrow or have been told that the debt has been sold on, i have compleetd the admission paperwork admitting to the full claim even though its nearly double the original debt and was about to send it off when i came accross your site, what am i best to do??

Edited by goonerhenry
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 731
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

simply send arrow global a CCA request the template is in the templates library, it costs £1 and send it recorded but do not sign it, if after 12+2 days they have failed to provide a valid agreement, then inform them the account is in dispute and stop all payments to them.

 

do not acknowledge any debt to arrow

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

template N

Link to post
Share on other sites

it doesnt really say the front just says claim form, under the particulars of the claim it says the following:

 

1. the claim is for the sum of £ in respect of monies owing by the defendant on a credit agreement held by the defendant with MBNA on which the defendant failed to maintain payments

2.a default notice was served upon the defendant and had not been complied with

3.by virtue of a sale agreement between MBNA and the claimant the claim vested in the claimant who has a genuine commercial interest

 

it does say that the claimant is arrow global but to return the paperwork to eversheds, is this normal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK arrow are a DCA eversheds are a solicitors being used by arrow, hence return the paperwork to them

 

Also if you have not had any communication from eithe MBNA or Arow Global about this transfer of the debt I would in the first instance visit the CAB and get some legal advice.

 

I would also as stated earlier send arrow a CCA request today by speacial delivery

 

Hopefully someone more knowledgeable about these court matters will be along shortly

 

was the court form from Northampton Courts

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO NOT RETURN THE PAPERWORK.

 

What you have there is a county court summons. You should also have form of acknowledgemetn of service as part of a 'Response Pack'.

 

Do you have a copy of

[1] your agreement with MBNA?

[2] the default notice mentioned in the Particulars of claim?

[3] a notice from anyone saying the MBNA debt had been assigned to Arrow Global?

 

If you are missing any of these things I suspect the proper thing to do will be to deliver a letter to Eversheds requiring thme to comply with a request for the provision of those documents under CPR 31.14. I'll walk you through the sequence if it is appropriate.

 

Meantime, what is the amount of the claim against you?

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont have a copy of any of the paperwork, i may have had one for MBNA, but its that long ago i wouldnt knwo where to look, as for the others as far as im aware i didnt receive any paperwork saying the debt had been transferred, but as i was having numerous letters about other debts, the amount of the claim is around £6000, if you could walk me through the sequence that would be great, also while im doing this do i need to inform the courts or would me writing a letter to eversheds be enough for them to suspend action until the relevant paperwork has been received?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gooner,

 

Complete your acknowledgement of service form by answering all the questions and return it to the court indicating an intention to defend the entire claim. Then send Eversheds this letter:

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

 

CPR 31.14 Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 the assignment

 

3 the default notice

 

Your client should ensure compliance with its CPR 31 duties and ensure that the documents I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully

 

Any questions, just yell.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

right the missus has just told me that she put away allot of paperwork in a wardrobe, so before sending the letter to eversheds im going to have a look through and see if i can find anything, i will post anything i do find, thanks for your help so far surfaceagentx20

Link to post
Share on other sites

goonerhenry,

 

As x20 suggests, you should return the acknowledgement of service form but don't wait for too long. You only have 14 days after service in which to respond.

 

As to Arrow/Eversheds, I'm in the same boat with no CCA from MBNA, Arrow or Eversheds. I'm now waiting for a date from my local court on my application to strike out their claim becasue they have produced zero docs.

 

X20, I think eversheds use Bradford instead of Northampton, so shouldn't they have supplied docs with the claim form?

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Docman,

Yes, if this case was issued anywhere other than Norhampton Bulk, CPR PD 16 para 7.3 will apply.

 

x20

 

the court they are using is bradford, so does this mean they have already supplied the relevant docs? what does "CPR PD 16 para 7.3 will apply" mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a legible full copy of the credit agreement came with the Claim Form, then Eversheds have complied. If it didn't then they haven't and the appropriate way forward would be to demand it under CPR 31.14.

 

CPR refers to the Civil Procedure Rules, the collection of rules governing civil procedures in courts in England and Wales. PD stands for 'Practice Direction'. Most CPR have PDs guiding the way a party should conduct themselves and so on. CPR 16 PD para 7.3 says:

 

Where a claim is based upon a written agreement:

(1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing, and

(2) any general conditions of sale incorporated in the contract should also be attached (but where the contract is or the documents constituting the agreement are bulky this practice direction is complied with by attaching or serving only the relevant parts of the contract or documents).

 

You can find the CPR here, and CPR 16 PD 7.3 here.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

excellent thanks for clearing that up, the only paperwork that was sent to me was the claim form & a response pack, i have checked back through my old letters and to my knowledge i have only rec'd two letters from arrow global, a default notice which was dated the 19th december 2006 and the second being a termination notice which was dated the 5th of january 2007, other than that i have a few letters from MBNA before december 2006 none of which mention my account being passed to arrow, the others are all from eversheds after jan 2007 which again dont mention my account has been passed but do say there client is arrow global and NOT MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see what your DN looks like in a mo but you've already got your first headline defence sorted. Here's why:

 

The minimum period of time which may be allowed a debtor to comply with a default notice is 14 days after the date of service. If the DN was dated 19 December 2006 and posted to you that very day first class post, the deemed date of service would be 21 December 2006. If the date for compliance was 2 January 2007 only 12 days was allowed.

 

The failure to allow not less than 14 days after service constitutes a breach of section 88 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. This section provides:

 

88. Contents and effect of default notice.

(1) The default notice must be in the prescribed form and specify

(a) the nature of the alleged breach;

(b) if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it and the date before which that action is to be taken;

© if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be paid as compensation for the breach, and the date before which it is to be paid.

 

(2) A date specified under subsection (1) must not be less than 14 days after the date of service of the default notice, and the creditor or owner shall not take action such as is mentioned in section 87(1) before the date so specified or (if no requirement is made under subsection (1)) before those 14 days have elapsed.

 

The things in section 87(1) and which are prohibited under section 88(2) are (a)-(e) below, as follows:

 

87. Need for default notice.

(1) Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice ”) is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement,—

(a) to terminate the agreement, or

(b) to demand earlier payment of any sum, or

© to recover possession of any goods or land, or

(d) to treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred, or

(e) to enforce any security.

 

It follows that the termination occurring on 5 January was a termination not in accordance with section 87(1). Likewise the demand.

 

In short any sum of money claimed which exceeds what was truly the amount by which you were in arrear on the day the default notice was issued will now be irrecoverable. I hope that saves you a proper shed load of money.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

typically my scanner has packed in so im going to have to try and scan it in tomorrow at work, is it worth me getting the later for eversheds ready and sending the acknowledgment of service back to the court, if yes do i tick the box to defend all of this claim or to contest jurisdiction?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn. So you were in arrear to the tune of £6K or so when the default notice arrived?

 

Leave things as they are right now, take a step back and review in 24 hours once you've posted a scan of the default notice and perhaps the agreement itself if you manage to find it. And any stuff you might have about the instalment agreement you had set up with Eversheds as well.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...