Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Late Licencing Penalty


Nemesis_Drake
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5602 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All, I sold my motorcycle in April (it was raining) Duly filled out the V5C gave the correct portion to the new owner and then mailed the V5C to DVLA....I never had any other contact with DVLA until a demand for money fell on my doormat, What's this! :eek:

 

The letter goes on to tell how if I didn't receive a receipt from them within 4 weeks I'm liable for the "penalty" (Straight away my hand is up to be on the Germans side) Fortunately after owning the bike for 4 years I'd sort of figured out that the DVLA were slightly inept.....So I scanned the V5C before mailing it...After all it did take me 3 years to get the one I had!!!!

In my first letter I enclosed a print of the scanned image of the V5C clearly showing the new owners name and address.....And expected that to be the end of it....Now I have to contact DVLA as per the instructions on the rear of the V5C.

 

Below are the most recent letters.

 

Your Reference: NoMYexBIKE

Late Licensing Penalty: MYexBIKE

Dear MR Nemesis Drake

Thank you for your response concerning the late licensing penalty imposed upon you for failing to

relicense your vehicle as required¹ .

Although you have indicated that you are no longer the keeper of the vehicle, the Department has

not received notification of this².

When the department is advised that the keeper of the vehicle has changed we send an acknowledgment letter within 4 weeks of notification. It is a matter for you to pursue this letter. Details on this process can be found on the V5C. If you can provide an

acknowledgment letter that was issued prior to the Late Licensing penalty then no further action

will be taken.

However on the information before us you are still liable for the £80 penalty. Only payments received by 14/10/2008 are at the reduced rate of £40.00.

Please pay this penalty by cheque or postal orders made payable to 'DVLA', writing the vehicle registration mark on the back. The payment together with this letter should then be returned to the above address. Payments cannot be made by installments. If you wish to pay by debit / credit card please phone the above number.

Should you need to contact us, please quote the registration mark of the vehicle.

Yours sincerely

Mrs Thief

Enforcement Manager.

 

 

 

My proposed reply for your critique.

Late Licensing Penalty: MYexBIKE Your Ref NoandMYexBIKE

 

 

29/09/2008 1 Page with 2 images attached.

 

 

Dear Mrs Thief

 

 

Regarding your letter dated 23/09/2008 in which you state,

 

 

 

 

Although you have indicated that you are no longer the keeper of the vehicle, the Department has

not received notification of this².

When the department is advised that the keeper of the vehicle has changed we send an acknowledgement letter within 4 weeks of notification. It is a matter for you to pursue this letter. Details on this process can be found on the V5C. If you can provide an

acknowledgement letter that was issued prior to the Late Licensing penalty then no further action

will be taken. “

 

 

I have read the section on a V5C document and it states...and I quote

 

 

On receipt of a notification of Keeper change, DVLA will issue an acknowledgement letter after 4 weeks confirming that the Keeper has changed. You should keep the letter as a receipt”ª¹

 

 

As you will note more than 4 weeks have passed and I'm still waiting! You can be certain that when eventually it arrives I will indeed keep it.

I feel I have discharged my duty regarding the V5C.

I am of course assuming that the letter will be back dated?

 

 

With regards to regulation 22 of the Road Vehicles (Registration and Licencing) Regulations 2002.

You will note from my previous letter to yourself that the V5C was indeed duly completed with the name and address of the new keeper and was subsequently placed in the post on the 21/04/08 at Local PO.

Due to the previous experience with this motorcycle V5C I scanned the document prior to posting, as you can see from the V5C it took 3 years to originally get the V5C in my name!

 

 

If however you doubt that the dates and names on the scanned copy of the document are false I suggest you pass the matter on to the Police for investigation. I attach a copy to this letter in case you've misplaced the original. ª²

 

 

Hopefully this matter can now be considered closed? I certainly hope so!

 

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr Nemesis Drake

ª¹ Copy of this is attached.

ª² Copy of this is attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scanned image of rear section of V5C.....

 

V5.jpg

 

 

I think I would rather have my day in court than give in to this mentality of "Pay up or else"

Edited by Nemesis_Drake
Made 5 posts and posted the V5 image

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nemesis,

 

I was in a situation recently when the DVLA took me to court for supposed failure to notify a change of keeper. I didnt receive anything from them and just received a court summons for the matter. I appeared and fought them it took me 5mins in court and won, then proceeded to apply an order for costs. I also won that to. The DVLA tried to call it off at the 11th hour you will see my thread further down, got some good advice on it.

 

Think it is HELP REQUIRED!!! DVLA taking me to court thread.

 

 

 

 

Hello All, I sold my motorcycle in April (it was raining) Duly filled out the V5C gave the correct portion to the new owner and then mailed the V5C to DVLA....I never had any other contact with DVLA until a demand for money fell on my doormat, What's this! :eek:

 

The letter goes on to tell how if I didn't receive a receipt from them within 4 weeks I'm liable for the "penalty" (Straight away my hand is up to be on the Germans side) Fortunately after owning the bike for 4 years I'd sort of figured out that the DVLA were slightly inept.....So I scanned the V5C before mailing it...After all it did take me 3 years to get the one I had!!!!

In my first letter I enclosed a print of the scanned image of the V5C clearly showing the new owners name and address.....And expected that to be the end of it....Now I have to contact DVLA as per the instructions on the rear of the V5C.

 

Below are the most recent letters.

 

Your Reference: NoMYexBIKE

Late Licensing Penalty: MYexBIKE

Dear MR Nemesis Drake

Thank you for your response concerning the late licensing penalty imposed upon you for failing to

relicense your vehicle as required¹ .

Although you have indicated that you are no longer the keeper of the vehicle, the Department has

not received notification of this².

When the department is advised that the keeper of the vehicle has changed we send an acknowledgment letter within 4 weeks of notification. It is a matter for you to pursue this letter. Details on this process can be found on the V5C. If you can provide an

acknowledgment letter that was issued prior to the Late Licensing penalty then no further action

will be taken.

However on the information before us you are still liable for the £80 penalty. Only payments received by 14/10/2008 are at the reduced rate of £40.00.

Please pay this penalty by cheque or postal orders made payable to 'DVLA', writing the vehicle registration mark on the back. The payment together with this letter should then be returned to the above address. Payments cannot be made by installments. If you wish to pay by debit / credit card please phone the above number.

Should you need to contact us, please quote the registration mark of the vehicle.

Yours sincerely

Mrs Thief

Enforcement Manager.

 

 

 

My proposed reply for your critique.

Late Licensing Penalty: MYexBIKE Your Ref NoandMYexBIKE

 

 

29/09/2008 1 Page with 2 images attached.

 

 

Dear Mrs Thief

 

 

Regarding your letter dated 23/09/2008 in which you state,

 

 

 

 

Although you have indicated that you are no longer the keeper of the vehicle, the Department has

not received notification of this².

When the department is advised that the keeper of the vehicle has changed we send an acknowledgement letter within 4 weeks of notification. It is a matter for you to pursue this letter. Details on this process can be found on the V5C. If you can provide an

acknowledgement letter that was issued prior to the Late Licensing penalty then no further action

will be taken. “

 

 

I have read the section on a V5C document and it states...and I quote

 

 

On receipt of a notification of Keeper change, DVLA will issue an acknowledgement letter after 4 weeks confirming that the Keeper has changed. You should keep the letter as a receipt”ª¹

 

 

As you will note more than 4 weeks have passed and I'm still waiting! You can be certain that when eventually it arrives I will indeed keep it.

I feel I have discharged my duty regarding the V5C.

I am of course assuming that the letter will be back dated?

 

 

With regards to regulation 22 of the Road Vehicles (Registration and Licencing) Regulations 2002.

You will note from my previous letter to yourself that the V5C was indeed duly completed with the name and address of the new keeper and was subsequently placed in the post on the 21/04/08 at Local PO.

Due to the previous experience with this motorcycle V5C I scanned the document prior to posting, as you can see from the V5C it took 3 years to originally get the V5C in my name!

 

 

If however you doubt that the dates and names on the scanned copy of the document are false I suggest you pass the matter on to the Police for investigation. I attach a copy to this letter in case you've misplaced the original. ª²

 

 

Hopefully this matter can now be considered closed? I certainly hope so!

 

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr Nemesis Drake

ª¹ Copy of this is attached.

ª² Copy of this is attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scanned image of rear section of V5C.....

 

V5.jpg

 

 

I think I would rather have my day in court than give in to this mentality of "Pay up or else"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nemesis,

 

The only comment I have got regarding costs is you will have to prove as much as possible. A letter from your employer/accountant stating that you have lost xxxxx amount. Time to research your case, telephone costs, stamps, internet usage, printer costs. Now I gave them a letter from my accountant to confirm loss of income, gave then an internet bill for one month, phone bill for one month, and I went into my local taxi office and got two of their cards, and wrote on the back of them, two receipts from my house to court, and the other for the return journey.

 

So when I won, I asked the magistrates to hear my petition for costs. I stated what Pat Davies in my post stated and they agreed with the evidence that I had and awarded costs in my favour.

 

It was that easy, no problem at all. It was the quickers 20mins in court that I have ever spent.

 

All the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

But it also says on the back of the V5c that the DVLA will issue an acknowledgement letter after 4 weeks confirming that the keeper has changed. You should keep the letter as receipt, In the event that you receive further correspondence concerning the vehicle. If you do not receive this receipt please contact the DVLA on 08702400010.

 

Did you not call them when you never received the letter after 4 weeks?

Edited by Yellow160
spelling

The views expressed on this website are mine alone and don't reflect the views of my employer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But it also says on the back of the V5c that the DVLA will issue an acknowledgement letter after 4 weeks confirming that the keeper has changed. You should keep the letter as receipt, In the event that you receive further correspondence concerning the vehicle. If you do not receive this receipt please contact the DVLA on 08702400010.

 

Did you not call them when you never received the letter after 4 weeks?

 

The key word that 21stcentury fought this on was it says DVLA will send a letter AFTER 4 weeks. 10 weeks is AFTER 4 weeks as is 25. He is still waiting. The correct phrase to use to convey the DVLA's intentions should have been "the DVLA will issue an acknowledgement WITHIN 4 weeks." This been the circumstances 21stcentury would have contacted them in the 5th week I am sure. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Mr Nemesis Drake

 

Thank you for your recent letter concerning the late licensing penalty imposed upon you for

failing to relicense your vehicle as required.

 

The keeper details you have provided will be used to update our records and an

acknowledgement letter should be sent to you within the next 4 weeks. If you do not receive

this letter phone 0870 2400010.

 

Although you may no longer be the owner of this vehicle we did not receive notification that the

vehicle had been sold and subsequently you remained legally responsible for the relicensing the vehicle.

 

In your letter of 29/09/08 you brought our attention to exerts from the 'Continuous Registration Explained' section on the V5C form. However you seem to have failed to note the continuing advice given in the same paragraph you kindly quoted being "If you do not receive this receipt please contact DVLA on 0870 240 0010".

 

Therefore on the information before us, you are still liable for the £80.00 penalty. Only payments received by 17/10/08 are at the reduced rate of £40.00.

 

Please pay this penalty by cheque or postal orders made payable to 'DVLA', writing the vehicle

registration mark on the back. The payment together with this letter should then be returned to

the above address. Payments cannot be made by instalments. If you wish to pay by direct debit /

credit card please phone the above number.

 

I have prepared a reply.....

 

 

Nemesis Drake Ref: Late Licensing Penalty:

 

A Road

UK

Postcode

 

Dear Mrs Idiot

 

Regarding your letter dated 03/10/2008

 

I feel that now you are resorting to semantics in your attempts to either “bluff or bluster” me

into paying the “penalty” for in your words “failing to relicense your vehicle as required¹” As you are

updating your records to show that I was no longer the owner when the vehicle became unlicensed I

would have thought you would have dropped your present line of pursuing me for not having done

that which is in all events impossible!

 

 

Furthermore you quote an irrelevant line from the V5C namely “If you do not receive this receipt

please contact DVLA on 0870 240 0010” You will have seen from the complete copy of the V5C

section which I sent that:

 

 

“On receipt of a notification of keeper change, DVLA will issue an

acknowledgement letter after 4 weeks confirming that the keeper has

changed. You should keep the letter as a receipt, in the event that you

receive further correspondence concerning the vehicle. If you do not

receive this receipt please contact DVLA on  0870 240 0010.

Customers with impaired hearing who have a textphone/minicom

should ring 01792 766426.”

 

 

I find the preceding paragraph unambiguous and the use of the word “after” to be well defined with

no time limit requiring any action be taken!

 

 

In conclusion I no longer wish to enter into correspondence with regards to this matter, further I

would rather the next letter you send me either have “Case dropped” or “You are hereby

summoned” in the header.

 

 

Regards

 

 

 

 

Not scared of you!

 

 

Although I doubt this thickie twin will understand the finer points of the English language at least I was hoping she would grasp "after" for what it means! and that yet again she wouldn't go posting crap through my letterbox......Can you tell I'm getting annoyed with her? :)

 

Any thoughts?

 

Or should I just go to court so I can report back on her educational standard?

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For info, I can advise what happens officially when the new owner plans to take the bike/car out of GB.

 

NOTHING!

 

Having returned the 'Export' vehicle slip - I made a mental note that I wanted some official confirmation that I had been removed from any liability for Continuous Registration. After hearing nothing, I emailed the DVLA go confirm I was no longer the RK.

 

They advised that I was indeed no longer the RK as the vehicle had been exported. I asked where was my confirmation of this, and was told THEY DO NOT PROVIDE the former keeper with any documentation showing the ending of liability for Continuous Registration!

 

Asking why the rules were so different between a UK RK change and an export, I was told I could always call them up and ask!

 

Continuous Registration/SORN is the DVLA equivalent of the PArking [problematic] - the sooner this is rectified, the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing to consider is that just because DVLA print on the V5 that if you don't receive the receipt for the change of ownership you should chase it, it does not automatically follow that is the law. When selling a vehicle you are required by law to post either the green or yellow slip to DVLA informing them of the change of ownership. This you complied with. I know of no law which states that if you have no confirmation from DVLA that you are required to either contact DVLA or re-submit the information. I cannot imagine that a prosecutor in Court could use what the DVLA choose to print on a V5 and claim it as a legal obligation, if no such law exists.

Edited by gwc1000
Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot imagine that a prosecutor in Court could use what the DVLA choose to print on a V5 and claim it as a legal obligation, if no such law exists.

 

Absolutely! JohnH2008 has just got a DJ to agree on this point, along with other stupid Capita comments & 'regulations'.

 

The thread is here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dvla/155894-sorn-statements.html

 

The more people take Capita (aka DVLA) to court on this one, the better. Look how the trickle on bank charges has grown to a flood with consumer pressure. :)

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just realised that probably thousands of people each year just pay these monkeys the £40 to avoid any "hassle".......or risk of the double "penalty" (My wife would have paid up straight away) Myself I just can't face giving these monkeys a "purpose"....

 

 

I'm wondering if I could get this escalated (if it ever gets to a court date) to a higher court?

 

One thing that sticks in my craw is the premium rate number I keep being given.......How can it be fair to charge over and above the national rate to phone a government agency?

 

 

I read Johns case with interest Foolishgirl :) A good and fair result!!!

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need for me to answer.... Cheers crem!

 

One thing I now have to do is contact DVLA to find out where the V5C is and get it to the new owner.

They've probably creamed £25 off that poor sod to supply it as well :evil:

 

Someone should take DVLA on, they've become right ribbing bistards

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've probably creamed £25 off that poor sod to supply it as well :evil:

 

Someone should take DVLA on, they've become right ribbing bistards

 

I can't see it...He had the tear off "New keeper" slip......It took me 3 years to get the V5C in my name so....I think they are slightly inefficient...or is that incompetent :D

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see it...He had the tear off "New keeper" slip......It took me 3 years to get the V5C in my name so....I think they are slightly inefficient...or is that incompetent :D

Do you know for certain whether or not he's had his v5c back?

BTW ive just sorned one of my vehicles online, as its the safest option :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing that sticks in my craw is the premium rate number I keep being given.......How can it be fair to charge over and above the national rate to phone a government agency?

 

 

Whilst not being in any way supportive of DVLA, 0870 is not a premium rate number (they all start 09...).

 

0870 numbers are being phased out by OfCOM. Originally, 0870 was national rate (even if you lived next door; 0845 was local rate (from anywhere); 0800 was free (paid by the recipient).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt whether he's applied for it.....DVLA came for me.

 

Have you thought of contacting the new owner?

 

If the RK details were updated then DVLA obviously knew you were now the ex-RK on such-a-such date.;)

 

It's either total incompitence down there or one big [problem] so I send everything RD that I can't do online.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Have you thought of contacting the new owner?

 

If the RK details were updated then DVLA obviously knew you were now the ex-RK on such-a-such date.;)

 

It's either total incompitence down there or one big [problem] so I send everything RD that I can't do online.

 

I'd go for completely incompetent! I received a letter from Moorcroft debt recovery today......If I was made of weak stuff it may worry me.......I'm looking forward to abusing these guys :)

 

 

According to their letter I may be prosecuted and fined £1000, My vehicle may be clamped (I presume the one I don't own) Or it may be impounded and destroyed......I'm shaking in my boots.

 

Not too sure how to proceed....Do I answer the door naked and invite them in? or polish a huge ornamental sword while talking to them....

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...