Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Non-compliance Of Claimant's With Court Order


Cat Woman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5725 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

We are the defendants in an ongoing case which has now got to the stage of abiding by the directions in the Judge's order by specific dates, etc. We've done everything we shoud have done thus far. However, the other side have done nothing - not disclosed anything at all, etc. etc. Everything we have written to the other side we have also copied to the Court, as instructed. A trial window is set for Jan 09 in fast track. The other side even contacted us for an extension date for disclosure of their documents - what a cheek! We are now in limbo & playing the waiting game. Surely the judge won't look at it any further if they've failed to abide by the Order. All this is, I might add, still with no copy of a CCA - which we have repeatedly requested since last March.

 

Is this normal legal practice????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I am a bit rusty at this, but if they have failed to abide by a court order then you can ask the judge to strike out the claim, usually however, the DJ will give them 2 more weeks. But I am sure that surfaceagent will be along at some point soon to clarify matters. It might help if you tell us why they have taken you to court, amounts etc

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks. The details were in an original thread from months ago & I can't find it anywhere on the forum. Basically, the debt (personal unsecured loan) was from circa 1997 for just under 6K. Whilst we have made some payments over the years, due to one thing & another, the payments were sketchy and the debt got sold to various DCA's eventually ending up with arrow global who appointed Eversheds to deal with it for them and it is now in the hands of the court. As I said, there is no CCA, no evidence of debt assignments, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have not complied with the court order, then it might be a good idea to take the bull by the horns and send something along the lines of this....(obviously you will need to edit the below to suit)

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Your help desk has informed me that my case has been stayed due to the fact that the Claimant has failed to contact yourselves within 28 days after receiving my defence.

On the 4th of April 2008 I requested under the Civil Procedure rules that the claimant furnish me with certain information (see attached letter) which would prove that they had the legal right to undertake Court action against myself with respect to the alleged debt as well as to permit me to submit an appropriate defence, to this date I have received nothing from the claimant.

In light of the fact that the claimant has failed to contact yourselves within the prescribed time period and has failed to provide me with the Statutory required proof that they can undertake Court action against me with regards to the alleged debt I respectfully request that the Court Strikes the Claim out

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can make a formal application to the court to have it struck out on the grounds above, but it costs you £75 to do this, however if you succeed you can claim it back along with all your other costs.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know only the judge can decide, but what do you think the chances of it being struck out would be, given the info from our side. We did see a solicitor at a free legal clinic a while ago - although he didn't seem to be an expert in debt - but he said the chances were about 50/50, meaning it could go either way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know only the judge can decide, but what do you think the chances of it being struck out would be, given the info from our side. We did see a solicitor at a free legal clinic a while ago - although he didn't seem to be an expert in debt - but he said the chances were about 50/50, meaning it could go either way.

 

If you did it, you cant be sure of the outcome, your only making a suggestion to the judge,he might strike it out, or he might make an "unless" order.

 

Im no legal expert i only go from experience and what i have learned on here,its something you could do if you are impatient, sometimes the court will do it of their own accord, its a bit of a lottery really.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen and heard of cases that have been struck out for non compliance, I have also seen cases where one side has been given another week or two to comply and failed and then the case was struck out, as CCM states, it depends on the judges mood on the day, there is nothing to loose by going for it and everything to gain.

 

You never said, when was the last payment or acknowledgment of the debt?

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...