Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

- Received BCW letter - Mystery creditor -


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5630 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Son received this letter this morning.

 

However they don't say who their client is other than Phoenix recoveries who are just another DCA.

 

The ref number doesn't relate to any creditor he has debts with nor does the balance. Any suggestions as to a good "explain what you are on about letter"

 

Thanks

Alf

BCWedit.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about this one Alf...

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

Yours faithfully

 

**Edit to suit **and don't forget, print your name, don't sign it. Send it recorded.

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

This is exactly how BCW 'announced' themselves to me last year ... no name, nothing except this 'Phoenix' outfit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is exactly how BCW 'announced' themselves to me last year ... no name, nothing except this 'Phoenix' outfit.

 

And what did you find out about who the creditor was, anything?

Are they still chasing you for the same unsubstanciated debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Unfortunately, yes ... first it was a confusing letter from Phoenix themselves, no creditor given and I open it going 'WTF does this mean??? what the hell is this about??' mentally *before the days I knew what threatograms were* ... next day ... got the BCW letter ... turns out it was Shop Direct Financial Services ... aka Littlewoods. Naively, but only because I didn't know my rights, I paid it by the end of the week. Just. Had some spare cash I'd scraped together, ... but they were utter utter so and sos on the phone ...

 

It was for an account I had genuinely forgotten all about ... very easy to do given the circumstances at the time ...

 

Tried to find out who Phoenix were online at the time. Odd thing was, was that the letter template sent by Phoenix and BCW ... were identical, layout was the same. At the time I assumed they were one and the same company. Don't think they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see, this could be the case here as son has two disputed debts with SDFS. Kays and Additions. Although the ref number BCW are quoting don't match either of them or the balance. He has never had any letters from Phoenix. Only Fredrickson International and Resolution Legal Servies, both quoting Phoenix as their client.

 

So guess he will just have to wait for a reply to the 'know nothing about it' letter he has just sent them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Got a reply from BCW

BCWedit-1.jpg

What documentation are they asking for from their client?

I never asked for any. Sent them them [42MAN] bog off letter in post #2.?

 

Well another letter this morning from BCW, same date 03/09

Not rearly the documentation I was expecting, even though I didn't ask for any;

BCW2ndedit.jpg

 

Should I just ignore it, as they appear to have their wires crossed like most of the other DCA's do

Edited by alfwithhair
Link to post
Share on other sites

Alf...send them a letter saying that as from now, you will charge them £12 for each letter you have to write.....

 

THEN you can send them a letter saying EXACTLY what they have written....it's pathetic, all they have is a letter saying 'YOU OWE US THIS'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Another year starts and another DCA in the play ground

Never received the paperwork I didn't ask for from BCW, instead a letter from Snotcall.

 

Totally different ref numbers to BCW but must be chasing the same debt as the balance is the same. Conveniently turned up today, well passed the 7 day deadline to pay.

snotcallJan09.jpg

 

So Monday will see that start of the 'do one' letter writing again. Will send them the same one as BCW unless anyone has a better suggestion, as still none the wiser what this debt is, never had an argos account. BCW said I owed Pheonix? Wish they would make their mind up

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...