Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Standard claim takes strange turn...


Davy27
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5715 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well hello there boys and girls.

 

I initially strated my fight back against the banks using thisismoney's website but come across a strange reply from one of the letters to Barclays.

 

Now, allow me to detail what has happened so far...

 

I sent a letter to Barclays, detailed below:

Ref: Account number: *******

 

Please send me all information that your company holds relating to my entire account history with your organisation.

Please include details of all transactions, and a copy of the original contract by which this account is/was governed including all amendments made to the contract terms since opening the account.

I would also like a schedule of all charges & interest applied to my account(s) including details of any instances that required manual intervention.

Please include a copy of the original contract by which this account is/was governed including all amendments made to the contract terms since opening the account.

 

I understand that under the terms of the Data Protection Act 1998, you are obliged to keep data on file for 6 years so I expect to receive at least 6 years data. However, if you hold data beyond 6 years, under the above act, you must supply it on demand. If you no longer hold data beyond 6 years, I would like a signed declaration from your data controller and a copy of all documents pertaining to its proper disposal.

 

All data, including data held on a microfiche must be provided within a reasonable timescale, a maximum of 40 days. I enclose the maximum statutory fee of £10.

 

If you cannot provide this information, I will accept copies of my statements dating back six years as an alternative, along with a copy of my original contract, but since I am not requesting this I still expect to be charged only the maximum £10 under the Data Protection Act.

I had got this letter template from Thisismoney.co.uk so I thought this was pretty well explained what I wanted exactly. Now, as you can see, I specifically said 'I enclose the maximum statory fee of £10' but I didn't actually enclose any money, I just assumed they would take this out of my bank account. I just assumed. They haven't asked me for the money but When I sent the exact replica to NatWest, they wrote back asking for £5 cheque, whcih I did. They may have done this because I believe the account is frozen because of inactivity and persistant unarranged overdraft, but that's besides the point here.

 

I have just checked my bank statement this month online and they have not charged me that I can see, but I do have a debit of 'Account fee' £6.50 whatever that is. I haven't gone over any unarranged borrowings so God knows, maybe that's it?

 

They replied 07/07/08 with a two paged letter. The first letter is shortened:

in response to your recent request, we enclose a summary of charges covering a 6-year period.

 

If you have questions etc etc...

I'm sorry, what?! I did not request a summary?!

 

Anyway, this is the sheet they posted. There was a URL at the bottom as a footer, like you would get if you hit print whilst in a web-browser: 'edostar-b.intranet.barclays.co.uk/fee/FFController.........etc' which suggests to me they've done it via thier in-house software they use in the banks, not actually pulling my statements down. Who knows if this isn't just 1 year for example?

 

The 2nd sheet:

2647737074_79a0f076f5.jpg?v=0

 

Now don't get me wrong, over £700 is a nice and juicy sum to claim back but I cannot be sure if this is accurate as I have not checked any statements myself as this is all they sent.

 

My current question:

 

Has anybody had this come back and what did they do? What came of thier next step?

Me Vs Natwest Progress: Claim stayed but may re-request due to recent hardship status (unsure on this step).

Me Vs Barclays Progress: Need to make list of charges to send

Mum Vs Natwest Progress: Calculating charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep agreed saintly they havent complied with your request so id send this to them plus your ten pounds to anyone who you havent sent it to as they wont do it without it and they wont automatically take it they want to slow u down and this does that so include this inm your letter to them with your fee if u forgot explaining how it was over looked and give them a little time to respond as u did origianally forget the fee hope this helps davey i will look at your other thread :)xxkia

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys thank you lots for your contribution. I understand how many times you guys mist repeat yourself, but everybody is slightly confused about different parts so they keep on posting the same stuff regardless! Kudos. I love you all =)

 

Anyway, I have the relevant non-compliance letter below:

 

 

 

But number 2 and 3 confuse me somewhat.

 

NUMBER 2

What are these 'legal notes' relative to? What would they include? Are these notes really needed at this point?

 

NUMBER 3

Manual intervention...? Say what??

 

Other then that, I really want to get this letter sent off today so would appreciate clearing this up before I go home from work (free print + post :) )

 

One more thing to ask

How many days should I give them 'to comply' ?

 

Thanks again.

 

edit: Letter sent 10/07. Given 14 days to comply

Edited by Davy27
Removal of template letter

Me Vs Natwest Progress: Claim stayed but may re-request due to recent hardship status (unsure on this step).

Me Vs Barclays Progress: Need to make list of charges to send

Mum Vs Natwest Progress: Calculating charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you need to do is adapt the letter to your needs

 

You want them to supply all information that they company holds relating to your entire account history . Not just a list of charges.

NUMBER 3

Manual intervention...? Say what??

 

This is when an actual person had some involvement not just a computer

 

 

One more thing to ask

How many days should I give them 'to comply' ?

 

I would suggest 14 days :)

 

 

You could try phoning customer services on 0800 282 390 and speak to an advisor there I phoned them about my statements and they came within a week ....... I also got a second set from the non compliance letter that I sent :)

 

 

saint

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys,

 

The more and more I look into doing this, the more people keep going on about filing in court.

 

I am sh*t scared of not only court but also the charges that come with them should I fail.

Me Vs Natwest Progress: Claim stayed but may re-request due to recent hardship status (unsure on this step).

Me Vs Barclays Progress: Need to make list of charges to send

Mum Vs Natwest Progress: Calculating charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We all feel like that at the begining ....... but the more you think about what the banks have had from you in charges over the years the more determined you are to get them back ...... Due to it being in the small claims courts then the issue of costs should you lose seldom come into the equation.

 

Also when you do submit your claim to court your claim starts earning the 8% s69 interest .. My claim has been held up in court for nearly 12 months interest to date stands at over £700 alone :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also when you do submit your claim to court your claim starts earning the 8% s69 interest .. My claim has been held up in court for nearly 12 months interest to date stands at over £700 alone :-)

 

The beauty is Davy , that you probably won't even have to go to court - but it's important to get your claim into the court system as soon as you can - using the timetable .......because it will inevitably be stayed along with the rest, until the judgement comes through, but then you'll be in the queue - and 8% interest is not to be sniffed at - you can start claiming it when you lodge your court action - along with your court costs.......

and now that the waiver has been extended again by FSA the only bonus to that is the interest will keep building.........:-)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but people are giving you duff info here, simply because they are missing the main element:

 

As long as you haven't sent them the statutory £10 fee, they don't have to comply with the 40 days deadline, whatever info they have sent you is not in compliance with your SAR because they don't have to.

 

Once you send the £10 fee then and only then does the clock start ticking on the 40 days and the obligatory sending of ALL data held on you.

 

Incidentally, the letter template you have used is pretty poor and misinformed, as the DPA does NOT state that they have to keep info for 6 years. The 6 years relate to the Limitations Act 1980 and the length of time before something becomes statute-barred, and it has SFA to do with the DPA.

 

As for the £6.50, you'll have to ask them what it's for, but the sooner you stop "assuming" and start knowing, the better off you'll be when it comes to gettign your claim sorted. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would beg to differ, bookworm - it's 'further down the line' info, not duff.:).

You have rightly given davy advice on his requirement to produce the £10 for SAR , together with the reasons and timescale.

 

However, he expressed a fear of going to court and saintly1 and myself were trying to bolster his confidence in that direction.

After all it's the fear of the unknown which deters a lot of people from starting and subsequently following claims through.

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to apologise BW, :) me and the wrong end of the stick are good mates these days - :rolleyes: I see where you're coming from now -:cool: and you were right...!

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Davy,

 

Here's the letter you should use - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-data-protection-act-subject.html

 

Send it off with the £10 fee and get a Certificate of Posting (free) at the PO when you send it.

 

Read through Link No1 in my signature below to acquaint yourself with the recaliming process, and come back with any queries.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awww, let's all have a group hug. :-D

 

I'm up for that! :D (((Hug)))........LOL!

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My last letter was not with a cheque and they sent me a summary. I want detailed info as is required and so sent another letter saying incomplete info etc but still didn't send any money as I was told on phone by cust serv that this would be taken out automatically, but has not.

 

Therefore I'm going back to the first step and make everything official and by the book (or website ;)).

 

Sending SAR 11/08/08 with £10 cheque

Edited by Davy27

Me Vs Natwest Progress: Claim stayed but may re-request due to recent hardship status (unsure on this step).

Me Vs Barclays Progress: Need to make list of charges to send

Mum Vs Natwest Progress: Calculating charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Davy, that's gotta be the best way forward for you.

 

;)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep i had to restart to best to do it this way dont give the banks any chance to wriggle out of it hope u get on ok davy :)ill keep looking in see your ok xxxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Davy

 

I've read all that you've posted and would agree that starting again is the best option. I've done it myself before and feel it is the best way to progress.

 

 

You will get your money back Davy, it will just take a bit of time so I would advise reading up on threads and being aware of what you need to do for the next stage of your claim ... being organised helps a lot :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I hear that they put all claims on hold because they're losing too much money?

Me Vs Natwest Progress: Claim stayed but may re-request due to recent hardship status (unsure on this step).

Me Vs Barclays Progress: Need to make list of charges to send

Mum Vs Natwest Progress: Calculating charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Davy , nice to see you back again -

I hear that they put all claims on hold because they're losing too much money?

 

Not quite Davy - they're not really that powerful - it's the courts who are staying the claims - the Banks ask for the stays - and unfortunately get them......... but they give the impression in their letters that it's they who are staying them - not true.......

 

Anyway - how far have you got with your claim now , Davy? :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...