Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Things today went from bad to worse,

 

First thing, I called county court to get a copy of the order in my favour faxed to me.

 

I then phoned and faxed TEC a copy of the order so they can start to do the revoking order, they tell me it can take 5 days to do it, but the council should return my vehicle.

 

Then phoned council parking ticket dept (who were in court with me yesterday and lost) and asked for the return of my vehicle, Parking tell me it is up to the bailiff to return the car and it is not in there hands.

 

I asked why this was and they said the bailiff section have to agree to return it. Ok I said, please put me through to that department. "I cant she said, the bailiffs are not allowed to speak to you"

 

so then I try the bailiffs direct number, and no one answers!!!

 

I then call the parking back, and am told legal services will call me later

 

5.30 a guy from legal services called me and said that the council were going to appeal the county court order, also that the Bailiffs wont return my car as they have a "court order" to seize it, issued by NORTHAMPTON COURT, i explained this was a "warrant of execution" issued by themselves on authority of the TEC and not the court.

 

I asked him if he had a copy of the "court order" and guess what.......He didnt have it to hand !!!!!!!!

 

He then hung up on me................

 

Any ideas???????????????????? icon9.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what's the alternative??

 

From what you say any appeal will have no merit which the court will recognize. I suspect the person you spoke to was peed off because you won decided to be petty

 

Contact them again in writing & threaten them with further legal consequences if they don't return you vehicle within 24 hours

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it be of any use to get your MP involved? It is unbelievable that this has happened.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am very confused at the suggestion of a High Court Enforcement Officer as for this to be applicable you will need to issue a summons....and if this is not defended and a CCJ is awarded THEN you can request that the Judgement is transferred up to the High Court. There is a fee of £50 and a further £60 fee. BUT you need to have a CCJ first.

 

The problem that you have is that your car was not removed by a traditional bailiff company. It was removed by a "bailiff" working within the local council an frankly I have doubts that this particular council know the law. This is evident of the fees and charges that they have posted on the own council web site.

 

I doubt whether they have ever had this situation before.

 

You appealed an Out of Time rejection using an N244 which has been successful. In this case the Warrant of Execution has been REVOKED as provided under paragraph 8 (5) of Schedule 6 of the Road Traffic Act 1991.

Crucially this provides that "any execution issued on the order shall cease to have effect" and that the "authority shall forthwith inform any bailiff instructed to levy execution of the withdrawal of the warrant"

 

The car MUST immediately be released. That is CLEAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If what I have read is true and the council have been seen to have acted beyond their authority and are now attempting to be as obstructive as possible, then if I was in this position I would immediately apply for a High Court Injunction to have the car released.

 

Further - armed with a County Court Order in my favour which you should show the High Court, I would would do it on an Ex-Parte basis, that is without the other side knowing about it. It would be unlikely that a High Court would not support the lower County Court and the car should be released. If the Council refused, then armed with the same High Court Injunction, you could now involve the police as refusing to obey a High Court Order is contempt of court - a criminal offence.

 

An injunction is not the end of the matter, it merely advances a dispute in the favour of one party. A full hearing may be scheduled for later. At which point the council (if they feel that it is in their interest to attend) have every opportunity to produce their non existant court order and give every reason why they lied to the DVLA and why they refused to release the car via the County Court Order and then explain exactly why they think there is merit in opposing the injunction. The other option is that they finally realise that this farce as gone as far as it can and that their best course of action is to back off, shut up, release the car and pay compensation.

 

You will also have all the ammunition required to rid the area of this troublesome blight on humanity via Form 4 for both Jarvis and Walshe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess what !!!

After a lot of emails and calls to the council yesterday,

I got a call saying I can get my car back, also council tell me they wont appeal my case, so I go to get my car and it has damage where it has been moved about without keys. the damage has been photographed by me and the people at the auction, now I must report this to the council.

 

so thanks to all of you out there for your support and advice so far.

 

Only the form 4 complaint court case, and the possible data protection issue

to go now

 

keep smilling

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice guys. Is it a thing I do myself or should I get a solicitor involved.

 

I am getting the damage estimated today by a couple of bodyshops and will forward these to the bailiffs and the council legal dept.

 

As fot the compensation side, Do I claim for the damage and loss of use as I have two other claims to make (for the missuse of my personal data and the form 4 complaint).

 

As I am typing this my blood pressure is rising and due to my health problem (caused by this bailiff and his actions), I feel it nescessary point this out in this and any further claims but I am having trouble putting it down in words.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you issue your claim issue it in as simple words as you can. Describe to the best of your ability what you are claiming. Ie loss of use , If you had hired another vehicle what would the cost have been or is. The damage and so on. When you do a n4 complaint you need to do it in a specific way.

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you consider.....

 

:!: 6 police officers,

:!: 3 squad cars,

:!: A big yellow towtruck,

:!: A bailiff calamping my car,

 

and all at 8.50 on a tuesday morning when neibours are going to work and kids are going school, cause for defamation claim. I think I will be making that claim .:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

oops police assisting in an unlawful act. Complain to the Chief Constable when that fails (which it will) report their actions to the Police Complaints Authority

 

I'm not trying to attack the police but until enough victims of these miscarriages complain it won't stop

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no hope for this country with councils like this! Well done and keep up the fight.

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks, the saga continues.............:eek:

 

The TEC sent me my revoking order.:)

 

Now the council parking department has sent me (by recorded delivery...they are learning !!) a new "notice to owner" to fill in and return within 28 days, with a payment of £80

 

as this is the first one I have received, as me winning the court case proves,

and it is 20 months after the so called offence, Is this grounds to appeal under the 6 month rule.

 

What do I do now?

 

This council just wont let it go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course it is

 

I should warn them you consider their appalling repeated conduct to be vindictive as well as an abuse of process. That in view of this you will at the very least be seeking cost & damages as well as reporting them to the local government ombudsman for maladministration

 

Furthermore as they are attempting to obtain money knowing they are no longer entitled to you may have no choice but to report named staff who are conducting, what you now believe is a vendetta, for misfeasance in public office which they should know is a serious criminal offence

 

Don't pussy foot around with this lot go for the jugular

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks, the saga continues.............:eek:

 

The TEC sent me my revoking order.:)

 

Now the council parking department has sent me (by recorded delivery...they are learning !!) a new "notice to owner" to fill in and return within 28 days, with a payment of £80

 

as this is the first one I have received, as me winning the court case proves,

and it is 20 months after the so called offence, Is this grounds to appeal under the 6 month rule.

 

What do I do now?

 

 

Lets get something cleared up here.

 

The case you won was to allow a out of time stat declaration to be filed . Which the judge has allowed. However this does not cancel the original notice to owner which will be re issued and you must appeal it. Then if they refuse goto traffic penalty tribunals or ptas. Appeal it there and then if they accept you appeal the pcn will be cancelled. If they refuse then you must pay it or file another p2.

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...