Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mackenzie Hall vs Captain Spaulding


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5827 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Received a little letter from Mackenzie hall today regarding an alleged > £6k debt for original creditor of Barclaycard Masterloan. I have no idea what this alleged debt is or where its come from.

 

Mackenzie hall have been kind enough to provide a standing order mandate requesting sums of cash per month.

 

I presume a prove it letter is the next step... Any hints/tips about dealing with this **** would be great, yea right ;)

 

Thanks

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to Barclaycard Masterloan

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh the joy, will get it in the post recorded 2nd class tomorrow then update as soon as I hear something.

 

Anyone have any experience with Mackenzie Hall?

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may be a stupid question but I'm going to ask anyway. With DCA's phishing and making demands without providing evidence, how would I stand in summarising fair costs (postage, time spent investigating etc etc) and sending an invoice with payment terms to the DCA, once they exceed terms they go into a notice period before I take court action with a view to get the DCA a CCJ

 

An example is if the DCA does not conform to a CCA request and commits a criminal offence, is this an opportunity to invoice them for each additional letter you have to send in response to the threat-o-matic letters?

 

Sure I'm not the first to ask but what would stop me doing this?

 

Thanks

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome, today I'm sending a prove it letter and will await a response. Dependant on the outcome, If I then have proceed with statute barred or a CCA request I will modify the letter to inform them that for each response following the request and up until such time that evidence is provided there will be a charge and will present said charges and payment terms to them, that way they cannot argue they were unaware.

 

Of course, they will not pay however once an invoice has been issued it will remain open until such time that its disputed or paid. How would I proceed with court action to enforce payment of the invoice?

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I totally agree that hitting ****** debt collectors in the pocket is probably the only language they know charging £35 for a letter may be excessive. It would be much better to insist that Mackenzie Hall comply with the directions in your letters and supply you with details of their complaints procedure.

 

Make that complaint and allow them the eight weeks to resolve the compliant. If you are not satisfied then complain to the Financial Services Ombudsman. He'll charge them around £400 just for a visit. He may fiond in your favour and award you compo. All legal. If they don't pay then go for the ccj!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your post. In respect to charges I agree these would need to be fair, representative and relevant and I agree that the best outcome is a letter stating the case is effectively closed.

 

My time however is not free and incurring cost to cover underhand activities should not go without recourse. I agree with you about following procedure, the only question is at the end of the process, if I were to provide a statement for the DCA, they could argue that they were not informed and *may* not have continued correspondence etc

 

The thumbs up from TS and FSO would be great to use in court when presented invoice is not paid

 

I know it may seem like its just anger talking but has the above been tested before, if so what was the result?

 

Many thanks

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bet that rocked them, I'm sure they would not like many caggers to start doing that!!!

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've started to look into the intended process to ensure any charges and method of applying charges are lawful, fair and are processed in such a way they can be used in court. I'm also looking into timescales and methods

 

Will update as soon as I know more

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far, I've looked into a few things.

 

Before charges can amount, I would need to make the DCA aware of the charging model and describe the service/product offering, I would need to present this to them outlining payment terms etc.

 

On presenting the invoice, I would need to state the payment terms, standard 30days

 

If invoice is not paid then the invoice would go into a resolution period of 14 days. If invoice is disputed, then same 14days applies

 

Following this period, a 'Letter Before Action' would be sent (I have the draft), again 14 days to resolve.

 

When invoice is not resolved, I would process the court application online and attend court to try and obtain invoice total and all costs. If I lose however, I would pay the DCA's cost

 

Currently Unknown:

 

When would I provide the initial invoice?

What are the legal terms that need to be supplied when presenting or warning of charges of service?

Is there any legislation that exempts charging of services whilst reasonably disputing liability of alleged debt?

Can anyone help on drafting the letters?

 

The driver is that these companies can pretty much do what they like, to hit them financially and lawfully may help them change their direction a little. If you can help, please post up...

 

Please someone shout if this all sounds a bit stupid?

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...