Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.   Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

John Lewis


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5636 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everybody,

I hope someone out there can answer my question,

 

My hubby used to have a store card with John Lewis, he opened the account in1995, kept it in good order and never missed a payment, 2 years ago we sent of a cheque for £200 to close the account, a couple of months ago he recived a letter from them demanding payment and a default notice, he rang them up and explained the above, they still insisted there was a balance to pay, plus intrest, he then sent of a cca request, today he has recived a letter headed WITHOUT PREDUDICE, please find enclosed your last 6 mths statements, these staements show an outstanding balance of over £300, BUT they go on to say they can NOT produce the legal signed document as they are not in possesion of it.

they have asked us to forward the £300 plus, if we dont they will pursue the matter futher.

WHAT CAN WE DO NEXT.

 

Thanks a lot,

Brecken xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your answer there would be what can they do next ;)

 

BUT they go on to say they can NOT produce the legal signed document as they are not in possesion of it.

 

 

 

honey x

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long since you sent for the CCA? They have 12+2 days to produce it, a further 30 days after that & they are in default, meaning the debt is unenforceable & they have commited a criminal offence. The clock is ticking & unless they they can produce the CCA they have no case to take it further. Of course they may try...

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

John Lewis have now asked Wescot to collect this debt, even after sending a letter stating they do not have a signed credit agreement, can they do this ? and what should be our next course of action, we have to reply to Wescot within 14 days or they are going to issue legal proceedings automaticaly, I didnt think they could do this without a signed agreement, can anyone help with advise as what to do next.

Thanks, Brecken xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say you sent a cheque two years ago, so why not send them proof that the cheque was cashed - a bank statement for example? The bank can send you a copy of the cheque if necessary too!

 

Surely that solves all the problems in one go?

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A short letter to Westcot should suffice:

 

Dear Dullards

 

I refer to your letter dated (date), the content of which is noted. However, your client is in default of a formal request, made on (date) pursuant to ss.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Furthermore, your clients have stated in writing that they are unable to produce the required documentation.

 

In the circumstances, your demand for payment is unlawful, and any legal proceedings brought would be vexatious. Your letter is clearly in breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on Debt Collection.

 

I am not prepared to enter into further correspondence with you. Take notice that any further unlawful action on your part will be reported to the appropriate enforcement agencies without further notice to you.

 

Yours etc.

 

If they write again:

 

Dear Dullards

 

Thank you for your letter dated (date), the contents of which are noted. In reply, I refer you to the case of Arkell v. Pressdram (1971).

 

Yours etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But again, if the account was already paid up, why not just send the proof?

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But again, if the account was already paid up, why not just send the proof?

 

 

Because it's for the DCA to prove that the debt is owed, and not for OP to prove that it is not. However, the lack of an agreement makes any debt unenforcable anyway, and is a complete defence to any legal proceedings.

 

If wished, a further paragraph could be inserted in the letter:

 

In any case, the alleged debt is formally disputed because it was settled in (year).
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ker,

 

I appreciate it would be so much easier just to send proof of the payment, but we have changed banks since and Halifax have asked for payment in order to send proof of the payment and for a copy of the bank statement, Im not prepared to pay any amount however small to anyone when I know this debt was paid, My argument is why wait 2 years to tell us the cheque wasnt received, I have tried to reason with them and and have asked if it maybe a clerical error on their part but they wont except this, and they have also added interest monthly over the 2 years, and charges, so in reality we should have received monthly statements, but we have never received anything in all that time until recently.

I have however learnt a lesson, I will keep all correspondence for ever in the future.

I will send Wescot the letter and will see what happens next, I may have to give in in the end and send proof.

 

Thanks a lot,

 

Brecken xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if you S.A.R them you have to send £10, then they have to send all the details relating to your account I think.

 

So see which way is the cheapest and go that route maybe? :D

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If wished, a further paragraph could be inserted in the letter:

 

Ok, the paragraph you said add would make more sense. As otherwise it just read like a denial haven't paid letter - when the OP clearly states they have!

 

:)

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

This just goes from bad to worse, please read on,

sent them proof final payment made,

they then sent letter saying the card was used after this payment was made and this is what the outstanding amount is for, I do not and my hubby does not remember using the card after this date, we are quite sure of it.

we then recived a letter from westcot, the debt had been passed to them for collection, I sent them a copy of all correspondance from John Lewis, saying they have no signed agreement, just got letter back saying they have passed debt back to John Lewis,

John Lewis saying we have aknowledged debt because we have made previous payments, so has far as they are concerned we owe this money and they will continue to persue, we have threatned OFT, but the say they still have the right to persue. How on earth do we fight this ??????????

We have no way of proofing we did not use the card after this date, I'm not sure what to do next, do we just give in, or do we wait and see if they go to court, and them what do we do ????????????

Please help xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

another letter arrived today from john lewis giving us 7 days to make full payment, or court, they say paseed payments are enough to tie us to the debt.

We are getting relly worried now xxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say JL say the card was used after that, tell them to send you proof of that, reminding them that if they decide to take you to court, they will have to produce it anyway, so they might as well show you now, as it is their duty to try and avoid litigation. If there was a transaction, there would be statements to show it, so you are perfectly within your rights to see what the alleged transaction is.

 

Alternatively, send a SAR to them then they'll have to send you ALL of the data held on you. I bet that a lot of that balance wil be made up of unlawful charges anyway and this way you can stop poking on the dark not knowing what the amount is made of and instead knowing how best to approach the issue. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have asked them to send proof of the purchases made after account cleared, they said they would send statements out.

my concern is why wait all this time if a payment hadnt been made, we closed the account 3 years ago, and it's only in the last few months they say we owe the money, yet they also say, a final balance was paid oct 2005, then the account was used again in Dec 2005, but we knew nothing of it until now.

we are scared that we are indeed going to have to pay this balance, because we have aknowledged the account by making past payments to it.

where do we stand legaly xx

 

sorry if i'm confusing people, in my origional post I said account was cleared 2 years ago, i now know it was 3 years ago.

Edited by brecken
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, whether you have acknowledged the debt or not by paying the card is immaterial, you're nowhere near the statute-barred limit anyway from when you paid it off, so you couldn't use that argument anyway.

 

At the moment, you're just trying to guess what has happened, don't worry yourself over that just now, wait until you get your statements/info and take it from there. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

received statements and it does clearly show transactions for Dec 2005, the transactions were made in their newcastle store, I know for a fact we were not in the store on the day the transactions took place, we strongly beleive the account was used by someone else.

We have asked time again why wait almost 3 years to persue the outsatnding balance, their reply was it must have got lost in the system, we cant prove we didnt use the card on the day they said we did, because it was a Sunday, and we were both at home, had we been at work we would have had our clock cards to prove were we were.

I honestly dont know what to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...