Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We need to see the actual document from the IAS where it is written - "The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." You can't just type it up yourself. At the hearing in July or August or whenever the judge will have two Witness Statements. One from Bank's director says you never made a second appeal. You say you did make a second appeal and the IAS concluded that payment was made. The judge will immediately twig that either you or the director is lying.  But who? Fail to show the documentation form the IAS and instead just produce something you've typed yourself will make it look like you just made up the appeal and you are lying and you will lose the case. Please let us see what the IAS adjudicator sent.
    • I used to have a retail outlet in London selling my husband's photography.  We also had a co-op with staff so they weren't directly employed by me, but I paid for the other overheads etc.  When my husband died, I carried on as usual for a while but then I became ill and moved quite far away so logistically was becoming very difficult.  I came to an arrangement (verbal) with one of the guys I trusted, that I would send him the images to print and sell as normal, and I wouldn't take any money, as a short term solution until I got back on my feet and worked out the best way to do things. He would pay all the  rent, insurance etc... Over a year later, not able to give things away for free anymore,  I drew up a contract as a wholesale agreement, so I would get everything printed and sent to him and I would invoice his for what he ordered. I noticed form the beginning that he wasn't ordering enough or frequently enough to be making any money, and was suspicious he was doing his own orders on the sly and ordering just enough from me to keep my happy.  I checked with my printer, which I've been with for 20 years, and he sad he wasn't getting orders for my images from anyone else. I emailed a few other printers to ask them to keep a look out for some images but I soon realised this would be impossible to police.  The only option really would be to buy a print from him and check the stamp on the back of it.  I finally managed to get hold of on the prints on sale, and sure enough, he did not order it through me.   In the contract he signed in 2022 it explicitly states that he must destroy all files I had previously sent him etc etc so e is in breach of that.  When I drew up the contract, I was careful to make sure it was legally binding, but before I let rip at him, I need to know where I stand.  The contract is here: PARTIES This WHOLESALE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made effective as of 30th June, 2022, by and between ############################## The Supplier and the Client, collectively referred to as the "Parties," hereby agree to the following terms: TERMS AND CONDITIONS SALES OF GOODS The Supplier agrees to provide the following goods to the Client (“Goods”): Description of Goods ################################# Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b BOTH PARTIES AGREE: The Client purchases the Goods through the Supplier directly, and agrees to delete/destroy any previously held digital images (Goods) owned by the Supplier, and agrees not to use any such files for monetary gain, outside of this agreement, either directly or through a third party from immediate effect of this agreement. The Client purchases the other materials necessary for resale of the Goods independently of this agreement. The Client shall have exclusive rights for resale of Goods at ###########, and also with permission, as a retailer of the Goods elsewhere, provided that there is no conflict of interest between the Supplier and the Client. The Client is free to decide their own retail prices, for the Goods. The Supplier shall use #####  to provide the printed Goods on Fujifilm Crystal Archive paper, with Lustre finish, and will not use any other Printer unless #### cease to trade, without prior approval from the Client. The Supplier shall not impose restrictions on size or frequency of orders made by the Client. The prices provided by the Supplier shall not increase for a minimum of 3 years, unless the prices of the raw materials rise, in which case the client will be informed immediately. Any discounts/promotional prices of raw materials shall be passed on to the Client by the Supplier, and the invoice will show adjustments for this, as well as credit for return postage of any damaged goods. This agreement can be terminated by the Client without notice; the Supplier must give notice of no less than 90 days, unless the terms of the agreement are breached, in which case, the agreement can be terminated with immediate effect. PAYMENT Orders must be paid for upon receipt of invoice, via Bank transfer: ######### Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b DELIVERY AND INSPECTIONS All orders received by 12.00am (midnight) shall be processed by the Supplier the following working day and delivery of order shall arrive in accordance with the Royal Mail schedule, or DPD, should express delivery be requested. The Client shall be liable for the delivery charge which shall be added to the invoice. The Goods will be delivered to the address specified by the Client. The Client shall be provided with order tracking, and should any problems arise with the ordering system or the couriers (Royal Mail, DPD), the Client shall be informed without delay of any such issues. The Client will inspect the Goods and report any defects or damage to the Goods in transit as soon as possible upon receipt of Goods, and will retain damaged Goods for return to Supplier for refund/replacement. GENERAL PROVISIONS CONFIDENTIALITY The prices of the Goods and other information contained in this Agreement is confidential and will not be disclosed by either party unless with prior written consent of the other party. INDEMNIFICATION The Client indemnifies the Supplier from any claims, liabilities, and expenses made by any third party vendors or customers of the Client. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with UK Law. ACCEPTANCE Both parties understand and accept the wholesale arrangement stipulated under this Agreement. Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Wholesale Agreement as of the day and year set forth above.   Signed by us both electronically.   I haven't broached any of this yet, and I am looking for some advice about what action to take.  The main issue I've got is that he has still go those images.  If I terminate the contract, I will need to know that he no longer has those images and I can't think of a bulletproof way to do this. I'm thinking I might tell him I will continue with the contract but ask for a  sum in damages and say that if I find out he's still doing it down the line I will terminate the contract and sue him for damages. The damages side of things I'm not sure how it would work as he is self employed, and I'm positive he doesn't declare all of his earnings to HMRC, in order to find out how much I have lost, would the court demand to go through his tax self assessments?  I'm not sure how to proceed with this, I don't want to lose that place as an outlet as it is in a prime spot in London, which is why I let him have those images in the first place as I would have had to pull out altogether at that point.  I am regretting it somewhat now though.  Please help.
    • I cannot locate anything in my paper work that states 2 payments were made? Perhaps you could point this out? In reply from IAS it states "The ticketing data has been attached" nothing was sent to me. I made a response to the IAS all this was done online
    • Thanks again for your responses. The concern I have here, is that freeholder of the land (a company, who presumably would have been the ones to have initially instructed PPM to manage the parking here), will have proof of exactly how long the vehicle was on site for, as the driver was meeting operatives from that company on a separate matter. On this basis, if the matter was to get to court, I feel all the other technicalities about signage, size of signage/font, lack of start/finish times, will not be enough to have any case dropped? This PCN was brought up to the freeholder but they have advised that PPM will not waive this charge. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just been knocked sideways with a 12 year old debt!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5761 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I answered my 'phone yesterday and basically got caught out regarding a debt i didn't even know existed from 12 years ago. The caller was from Debt Managers Ltd - i've never heard of them - and after a long-winded conversation in which i gave loads of information due to the fact i thought it was a company i'd applied for a job to calling, i was told i owed £583 from 1996 and i have to pay it or the baliffs are being sent around!

I've dropped myself in it really as it threw me and i've agreed to pay £5 a week starting Friday, even though in hindsight i'm pretty sure a 12 year old debt can't be claimed, can it? It was from when i was a student banking with Barclays Bank and i've never heard anything except when a letter arrived last week stating i owed £583 but it didn't tell me from when or to whom.

Any advice would be great as i'm pretty well screwed agreeing to this as i work part-time and only draw £80 a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds statute barred to me.

 

In other words you can tell them to go and whistle.

 

They cant send baliffs around unless they have a CCJ (which obviously they havent) someone more knowledgable will be along soon to fill in the gaps Im sure :-)

 

good luck

 

Mrs R xx

THE PRETENDER AGENDA - August 30,2008 - 2ND ROW!!! WOO-HOO!! :-)

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR A FAB NITE LEE! xx

Sunderland 011008 - THE BEST BIRTHDAY PRESSIE EVER! 'Aww, it's your birthday! Happy birthday darlin!'

 

02 Apr 2008, 23:55

OfficialLeeRyan wrote:

i like that!! its simple and good and gets the fans involved aswell x x x

 

MY SUCCESSES -

 

1st Credit (Lloyds TSB) admitted no CCA, reply from OFT 130608, reply from FOS 040608, adjudication stage rejected but still no contact....

 

My mate (Littlewoods/Moorcroft)

300608 -Long running battle,threatening court, CCA letter NO 2 and harrassment letter sent - passed back to Littlewoods early July.

070808 - Passed to Debt Managers, Acct in dispute/BOG OFF letter sent 080808...

140808 - Letter from Debt Managers passing debt back to Littlewoods - RESULT! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

If the debt is from 12 yrs ago then its statute barred DONT pay them on Friday.

Have they given you a reference number ? If so then send them the prove it letter

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your Name) Print do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although you have agreed to a repayment, you have not yet made a payment have you, and you have not acknowledged the debt in writing to them?

 

If this is the case, send them the Prove It letter, see where it goes, but as Mrs Ryan says "tell them to go and whistle". :D

 

I know the feeling about getting caught out on the phone though... don't worry, you can tell them absolutely anything, and you hear them typing away, but unless you put it in writing its worthless.

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See this for a similar story.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/142766-statute-barred-buchanan-clark.html

 

 

....also, as already advised, print don't sign the letter, as there have been tales of some such companies then lifting a signature from a letter and using it to construct other letters or agreements.

 

 

regards

 

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

then lifting a signature from a letter and using it to construct other letters or agreements.

 

Yes, I know.

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it matter that all this admission took place on the phone and not in writing?

 

Does anybody know how many DCA record calls?

 

Can a telephone call really be used as evidence?

 

I am also curious as to how they tricked you into giving more information, could you tell us more.

 

if they used deception then surely this also goes in your favour.

 

stick to the advice given about the letter its good sound advice and should shut them up

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it matters, he has no confirmed in writing that HE will pay, anyone could have answered that phone and confirmed YOUR NAME (Brother, Flatmate etc...).

 

I'd say that some record the calls, but I know Lowells don't (or didn't) As when they phoned me last year about something that was genuinely nothing to do with me, on a phone call, few days later sent my a payment book and a letter as it was alleged I had agreed to pay a debt and accepted it was mine, I wrote to them asking for a copy of the recorded conversation, some manager phoned me, regarding my letter, he confirmed during this call that Lowells didn't have the facility to record all calls, so I told him in that case I'll send him a CD copy of my recording, he was at a loss for words. I sent the CD, never heard from them again.

 

DCA's are experts at tricking people, some people will reveal anything on the phone, my mother for example, anyone can phone her and ask for her name and address, and she happily obliges, its not until she puts the phone down does then think what she just done. guess thats the age though...

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a DCA or similar are recording a conversation, then I do believe that they are obliged to tell you so from the very outset of the call, otherwise any such recording or transcript of such cannot be called upon or used as evidence.

 

I'm sure somebody else will be along soon to confirm whether or not this is actually the case.

 

Likewise, if you also have the facilities to record a conversation yourself, then when they call you, it is advisable to inform the OP that you shall be doing so at the beginning of the call.

This in itself will often be enough to either drop the call or temper their threats and aggressive tone.

 

However, it is always best when called by such people to just firmly state at the offset that you will not enter into any discussion about the matter over the phone, and that all communication must be made in writing.

 

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for the replies everyone as it lifts some of the pressure, i can tell you.

They didn't trick me really in anyway - as i stated, i've applied for a couple of jobs and also got a few things going on regarding my council tax recently, so i thought for the first 30 seconds i was dealing with someone to do with one of those issues. When i finally clicked on, i realised i'd confirmed my name, my address, my telephone number, etc. Then, once i asked them what they were calling for, they told me i owed £583 from an address i haven't lived at since 1996: again, i then made the mistake of talking to the person on the other end of the 'phone as i tried to work out what was going on in regards to this debt. As i've stated, i hadn't lived at the address for 12 years so i wasted time trying to jog my memory.

Then, after accepting the debt verbally - yes, i'm a clown i know - they asked me for an weekly outgoings over the 'phone to decide on the £5 a week repayment scheme.

As stated, i'm supposed to 'phone them on Friday and pay £5 via my Debit card, which i really don;t want to do as then they'll have my card on record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter whether you agreed or not or whether they recorded it or not - send them the letter saintly gave you.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And NEVER give a DCA your debit or credit card number to make offer any payment!

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

As stated, i'm supposed to 'phone them on Friday and pay £5 via my Debit card, which i really don;t want to do as then they'll have my card on record.

 

You don't have to pay it if you don't want to, it's Statute Barred unless you've made a payment in the last six years.

 

If you're having problems with Council Tax, concentrate on getting that sorted out before anything else. Getting in the poop with CT could ultimately lead to a short stretch digging Lizzies garden or a spot of community service. Not paying a SB unsecured debt simply deprives a Debt Collector of a small profit.

 

The right thing to do should be very clear. They'll still threaten you with court etc, but when they call just tell them to go ahead and you'll take the court option - they can't anyway and they know it. Just be aware it won't stop them threatening you and trying to wear you down. Be as rude to them as you like, it's fantastic form of stress relief and you will feel really invigorated and ready for anything afterwards!!!

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to pay it if you don't want to, it's Statute Barred unless you've made a payment in the last six years.

 

If you're having problems with Council Tax, concentrate on getting that sorted out before anything else. Getting in the poop with CT could ultimately lead to a short stretch digging Lizzies garden or a spot of community service. Not paying a SB unsecured debt simply deprives a Debt Collector of a small profit.

 

The right thing to do should be very clear. They'll still threaten you with court etc, but when they call just tell them to go ahead and you'll take the court option - they can't anyway and they know it. Just be aware it won't stop them threatening you and trying to wear you down. Be as rude to them as you like, it's fantastic form of stress relief and you will feel really invigorated and ready for anything afterwards!!!

 

My problems with Council Tax are sorted now, but as i stated, i believed the call to be connected with Council Tax, that's all.

What happens if they send baliffs around to my house, or worse, where i work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My problems with Council Tax are sorted now, but as i stated, i believed the call to be connected with Council Tax, that's all.

What happens if they send baliffs around to my house, or worse, where i work?

 

They can't, it's not possible unless you default on a CCJ - and they can't get a CCJ.

 

You have nothing to worry about as long as the debt is Statute Barred.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Putting it very briefly, if you haven't paid or acknowledged the debt in the last six years it's Statute Barred.

 

It's unlikely, although not impossible that a CCJ exists, but you are obviously not aware of it. To 'revive' a CCJ that's over six years old and had no steps taken to enforce, they will need the OK from a County Court and to explain why they haven't bothered with it, so you've done the full circle. At that point it may be possible to defend, and things will be stacked in your favour.

 

Some may disagree, but I still think it's their move and you can tell them to get stuffed.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Putting it very briefly, if you haven't paid or acknowledged the debt in the last six years it's Statute Barred.

 

It's unlikely, although not impossible that a CCJ exists, but you are obviously not aware of it. To 'revive' a CCJ that's over six years old and had no steps taken to enforce, they will need the OK from a County Court and to explain why they haven't bothered with it, so you've done the full circle. At that point it may be possible to defend, and things will be stacked in your favour.

 

Some may disagree, but I still think it's their move and you can tell them to get stuffed.

 

Well according to the person i spoke with, they've been trying to find me since 1997 but have been unable to locate me - this is due to me living all over the country, working, studying, etc and it's only since this year at my current address that i've been "found" due to the electrol register.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not your problem. "Unsecured" means just that, in all it's glory.

 

If you want to pay it nobody is stopping you - but you have no legal obligation to as the debt will have been written off by the original creditor and is long dead and buried.

 

Is it your debt, did you deliberately and knowingly just decide to ditch it at some point??

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...