Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First ever bank charge.


Kerrie78
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5804 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

My hubby has been on benefits since suffering 2 strokes, and for the last 4 months they have really messed him about with his benefits, totally stopping his Incapacity, then giving us a smaller amount of IS while everythiing was looked into.

 

Then last Thursday we awoke to find no income support had gone in, so it left us about £30 to live off all week. We phoned and they said it had been automatically frozen due to a bank of england interest rise and she was sorry that it hadn't been re-started automatically. She eventually sent us a giro but with it being a bank holiday we couldnt get it into the bank until Tuesday.

However, on Tuesday our Severn Trent Water D/D came out, and obviously put us overdrawn by £25. Today I have looked and they have bounced the DD but taken their own charge of £38.00!!!!!

 

How can they do this within 1 day, their charge is more than what the Direct Debit was for in the first place. This is the first time we have ever incurred a charge with them. I'm disgusted so here's me starting my thread just incase this sets us off on a downward spiral of charges!

Settled at 50%

Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest :( Husbands Account.

 

 

SETTLED IN FULL:

MBNA £1230. For Hubby.

Halifax £39.

RBS £342. For Hubby.

Cap One £200.

Abbey:

:D Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

:D

COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the sig after your message, it appears you know exactly what to do :D (well done with all those). If you contact the bank immediately, preferably in writing, because you took issue with them so soon, they "might" be sympathetic. Then again, if not, you could eventually look forward to another payout.

 

The trouble with banks is that they only look at one line (the balance). No regard is paid to your banking history.

 

Just a thought, but I would take issue with the benefits people. They caused you to incur the charge due to their ineptitude. I would hassle them.

 

Good luck with the fight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my own nastygrams (years ago), I always pointed out that settling earlier would (have) reduced their costs. They didn't listen; their loss! But their delays still cost me in terms of inconvenience. I also explicitly mentioned by financial difficulties, and they didn't listen, but it is something you can point to later.

 

If you have immediate financial trouble, you might find it helpful to open a second account somewhere - possibly with the Post Office rather than a bank - so that you can get your benefits without them being immediately swallowed up by past charges. I personally entered the "cash economy" for several months in that situation, but that is more difficult when benefits are involved - I was working odd jobs.

 

Somebody also mentioned a letter that you can file with the bank to request that particular sets of income are reserved for particular purposes, in this case essential living expenses. I have no idea whether this works, but it's worth a try if your next benefit comes in before you can switch accounts.

 

As it happens, the £38 charge is also well above the £12 threshold mentioned by the OFT at some point. Hmmm...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Chromatix

 

The letter you are referring to is Right of Appropriation letter. Unfortunately, most banks ignore them.

 

The £12 only applies to credit cards and even then is the level the OFT have set as a trigger for them taking action not a fair or lawful level.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I do know the procedure lol, Abbey were real buggers, they put up a gargantuan fight but as someone said before, that was to my benefit cos I got extra interest!!

 

I asked nicely in Natwest but the bloke was rather rude to be honest, he said funds should have been there to cover it, I mentioned the bank charges fiasco and court and he just said:

"Do whatever you want to us, take us to court" then he turned his back on me and walked away.

 

The most rude person i have ever spoken to in my life.

Settled at 50%

Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest :( Husbands Account.

 

 

SETTLED IN FULL:

MBNA £1230. For Hubby.

Halifax £39.

RBS £342. For Hubby.

Cap One £200.

Abbey:

:D Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

:D

COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted cos I was rather annoyed (well a lot annoyed) when it happened yesterday and I needed to let off steam.

Since moving to Natwest we have been extra careful not to incur ANY charges whatsoever, until someone else's ck up causes us too.

I will be onto the Income Support folks but their argument will be that the payment was sent out on the Saturday and it's not their fault. I can see it a mile off. The IS Should have gone into the bank on the Thursday but they will manage to wriggle out of it. As I have already paid the charge I will just need to reclaim it using the normal steps.

 

Is this standard with natwest that they take the charge the same day. I havent come across this before as with Abbey I used to get a statement giving me a date for about two weeks in advance of when the charges would be taken.

Settled at 50%

Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest :( Husbands Account.

 

 

SETTLED IN FULL:

MBNA £1230. For Hubby.

Halifax £39.

RBS £342. For Hubby.

Cap One £200.

Abbey:

:D Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

:D

COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, Natwest do take the charge the same day. Then they will take a charge of £28 at the end of the following month for being over your overdraft limit, or in unauthorised overdraft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my goodness, so we have another one to come aswell, how can they charge twice for the same item, when they havent paid it in the first place.

Settled at 50%

Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest :( Husbands Account.

 

 

SETTLED IN FULL:

MBNA £1230. For Hubby.

Halifax £39.

RBS £342. For Hubby.

Cap One £200.

Abbey:

:D Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

:D

COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They charge twice because they class them as two separate charges. The first one for £38 is for "bouncing" your item. The second one for £28 is not for bouncing your item, its because you are/were/have been in an unauthorised overdraft. Crafty isn't it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

very crafty, and the big kick in the teeth is that we wereonly overdrawn by £2.45

Settled at 50%

Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest :( Husbands Account.

 

 

SETTLED IN FULL:

MBNA £1230. For Hubby.

Halifax £39.

RBS £342. For Hubby.

Cap One £200.

Abbey:

:D Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

:D

COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I'm back again lol. Yesterday we had 2 failed payments, (I know i'm totally at fault as I should have cancelled them but i didnt realise the date). So Natwest have bounced both of them and replaced them with their own charge of £76.

All I want to know is if there is a head office number for Natwest, because when I look online it seems that you have to call the local branch (who were totally unhelpful the first time).

 

As I said before, we have been so careful to keep within our limits, but we are still waiting on the DWP backdating our Incapacity Benefit and DLA claim. (My hubby has had strokes and is unfit for work). They said we were entitled to it going back to February, when they stopped it in the first place in error, but theyre taking such a long time to work out the figures and meanwhile we are on the reduced rate of Income support, and child tax credit but nothing else, and as a family of 5 its a bit hard some weeks to get everything paid.

 

Thanks

Settled at 50%

Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest :( Husbands Account.

 

 

SETTLED IN FULL:

MBNA £1230. For Hubby.

Halifax £39.

RBS £342. For Hubby.

Cap One £200.

Abbey:

:D Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

:D

COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any help to you... Quoted from anothr thread(but note the date.. if anybody can confirm it's correct). The link to the thread is at the bottom.

 

Thanks for advice Fred Funk. I think I will write to Nat West, Borhemwood and for good measure, send a copy to Sir Fred. Have just phoned the tel number wilipwoy (see wilipway posting 23 March 2006), suggested for Sir Fred Goodwin namely 0131523 2033, and was given another Head Office address (they suggested marking it for his attention). In case its any use to anyone else, it is: Sir Fred Goodwin Chairman & CEO of the RBS Group, (including) Nat West, GOGARBURN, Edinburgh EH 12 IHQ

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/11613-nat-west-robbery.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...