Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Question on Notice and Deposit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5838 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all. What a useful forum I've stumbled across. Got to love Google!

 

Here is my problem:

 

We are American expats living here on a 2 year assignment. We've lived in our house for about 16 months. We believed we were going to be relocated to another country this summer and we mentioned this to our landlord once when they were here to fix the heating. About 2 weeks ago, I got a call from our Letting Agent saying they heard we were leaving in July and could they show the property. We agreed and showed the property graciously the following Monday (early May). On Friday - we received our "eviction notice" giving us the required 2 months notice and we are to be out by end of June. We were shocked and angry as we hadn't planned to leave the country until mid July (after school got out) and now were being forced to find alternative accomodation for those 3 weeks.

 

We even spoke to the new tenants (who lied to our faces) and told us that they were not in a hurry to move it. So then we asked the Letting Agent to ask the landlord to consider allowing us to stay until mod-July so our kids could finish up at school. That request was denied.

 

I was so upset that no one ever asked us when we were leaving. That the letting agent showed our house to someone they KNEW needed a place by July 1 and never asked when we would be leaving. And that the new renters lied to my face about their desire to move in by July 1. We NEVER gave the landlord formal notice that we were leaving in July - just an offhand comment. Lesson learned - believe me. None of that is particularly relevant but it may clue you in to my state of mind.

 

So, now I've learned that we are NOT leaving the country. We have found a new place and want to move in asap (as it is half the price of our current place).

 

From what I've read - I can notify the Letting agent of our departure with virtually no notice - correct? Since they've already kicked us out?

 

Also - I've canceled the S.O. paying the rent so next week when my rent payment is not made - I'm sure the Letting Agent will contact me. I'm thinking of staying until June 15 - giving us ample time to move out. Not cleaning or mowing or anything and allowing the Letting Agent to use my deposit (£1600) for the last months rent (£1500) and covering those costs. We haven't trashed the place and we won't be sabotaging anything or stealing anything. I just want to give them a small dose of their own medicine - that of total disregard of common courtesy.

 

Can they come after me for anything that the deposit money doesn't cover? (We have a large lawn and mowing alone could be over £100.)

Please bear in mind that I am not a UK citizen and therefore not terribly concerned about my UK credit rating.

 

Thanks in advance for your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have given you the correct notice to quit then you can leave whenever you want to up to the date they have given you

 

Personally i think they have treated you badly so i wouldnt pay the last months rent either (whoops did i say that out loud?) ;-)

 

Ive just reread his and i dont think they have given the correct notice

 

If your tenancy started on the 15th of the month then they cant force you to leave until the 14th july

What sort of tenancy did you have and what type of noticehave they given you? s21?

Edited by callumsgran
Link to post
Share on other sites

We had whatever is typical. AST I think? With a 6 month fixed period - then month-to-month after that. They gave us 2 months notice. I *think* the notice is OK - but if it isn't I'd be glad to hear that. Also - We are supposed to have an electrical inspection once per year and we have not had one since the tenancy began (Feb 07). They've had a contractor out here twice to complete it but it never got done as the contractor said it would be a bigger job than anticipated and I guess the landlord didn't want to pay.

 

I'm not truly concerned about anything but again - everything is ammunition at this point to ensure we don't get screwed even further

(pardon my American);-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had whatever is typical. AST I think? With a 6 month fixed period - then month-to-month after that. They gave us 2 months notice. I *think* the notice is OK - but if it isn't I'd be glad to hear that. Also - We are supposed to have an electrical inspection once per year and we have not had one since the tenancy began (Feb 07). They've had a contractor out here twice to complete it but it never got done as the contractor said it would be a bigger job than anticipated and I guess the landlord didn't want to pay.

 

I'm not truly concerned about anything but again - everything is ammunition at this point to ensure we don't get screwed even further

(pardon my American);-)

 

So to clarify an important question, you signed a contract 16 months ago on the 15th of the month, and haven't signed a renewal?

 

In that case you have a "statutary periodic tenancy": they need to give you notice of at least two months ending on a rent day. So if you moved in on 15th of the month and they gave you notice after 15th April 2008 the notice has to end 2 months on from 14th May - ie. 14th July as callumsgran said.

 

On the other hand, if you signed a 12 month renewal contract with a 6 month break clause on, say 15th December 2007 the rules are different (till the 12 months are up). Then as long as they give you notice of 2 months' minimum, they can end the contract on any date after 6 months (15th June 2008).

 

Yes they can "come after you" for any money (assuming you're still in the UK). So you would be well advised to be present for any check-out regardless of what you do.

 

I'm not sure that you have the right to move out "whenever you like" - perhaps someone can check. But if you are on a periodic tenancy you certainly have the right to give 1 month's written notice (prior to the 15th of May) that you intend to leave on 15th June.

 

So assuming you're on a periodic tenancy options are:

1. If their notice is illegal, you can ignore it, carry on paying the rent, and stay till they give you a legal 2 months' notice. You don't have to say anything - they'll find out on 30th June!

2. You can give 1 month's notice before 15th May.

3. You can do as you propose (stop paying the rent) - but it may be a lot of hassle.

 

Impartial advice would be to take a deep breath, think about your sanity and take option 2 so you can smoothly move into the better house you've found.

 

PS. I am not a lawyer. Citizen's Advice Bureau could also give advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it definitely doesnt sound as if your notice is correct, they've actually only given you six weeks if your rent period starts on the 15th of each month.

Also the electrical inspection is not legally required its discretionary so you dont have a case there

Gas inspections are however a legal requirement.

 

Hi Steve, re the moving out whenever

I was going by what someone on LLZ said, that the LL couldnt have it both ways, i.e give you notice and stipulate what date you had to pay rent up to.

Edited by callumsgran
Link to post
Share on other sites

Where a tenant is in occupation under an AST the landlord can only bring the tenancy to an end by obtaining a court order. The notice the landlord has to serve is nothing more than a preliminary step and does not on its own bring the tenancy to an end.

 

Once the date specified in the notice has passed, and not before, the landlord can apply to the court for an order for possession. Since the process takes several weeks, you would have had no problem staying until the middle of July.

 

The question of whether, once a landlord has served a notice requiring possession, the tenant needs to give notice if he wishes to leave earlier than the date fixed for possession by the court, is a tricky one to answer. Taking a strict approach, it would seem that notice is necessary. Since, as I said above, the landlord's notice does not bring the tenancy to an end it must follow that it continues. The argument against the strict approach is that if the tenant leaves he is only doing what the landlord wants him to do.

 

In your case, any question of whether or not notice needs to be given will be resolved if, after you leave, the landlord relets. Once he does that, the grant of a new tenancy will operate to forfeit the old one bringing to an end all obligations under the old tenancy as from the date the new tenancy is granted.

 

Since you have resolved to leave, be wary of arguing that the landlord's notice is invalid - you do not want him coming back agreeing and arguing that the tenancy continues and that you need to give notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agrre with that they will have to get court order for you to actually vacate the premises. So suugest you give the landlord notice of when you are actually going to leave and providing this is more than 2 months you are OK. end of story. No court would evict you just because you gave them more notice than required. Of course you can leave before that date but will have to pay rent to notice date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...