Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest/HL - claimform Cap1 debt *OH gave in £30PCM*


rogermeard
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 232
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

just a thought, but, there is no pleaded admission or denial, so, i would advise adding say before para 5,

 

Notwithstanding matters pleaded, it is denied that the Claimant has established a cause of action or that the claimant has a valid claim against the defendant.

 

just something that i often add to Defences within my day job

 

Hope this helps

 

If its before Para 5, does that mean it becomes part of Para 5?. Or just on its own between section e para 4 and prior to para 5?

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out post 78 again i have amended it...dont forget to fill in the dates, and where the xxxs are, print it out and see how it looks

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CCm,

 

I have requested the CCA a couple of times from C'quest, but only once did i enclose the £1 postal order, is a CCA request not valid if the £1 postal order is not sent with it?

 

With my defence you refer to Letters marked Exhibit A etc , do i actually enclose these with the defence and if i do is it copies or originals i enclose?

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only valid cca request is the one sent with the £1, so use that one

 

Exhibits are photocopies of the originals, attach copies with the defence

 

Suggest you send it by SD, dont send a copy to the other side

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update..........

 

Sent the Defence off to court today.....however the claimants solicitors have sent us (received today) a copy of the alleged agreement with some sort of terms attached, a printout of purchases, a dubious letter from the original creditor as a letter/deed of assignment and a letter from them that came in the same enevelope as the deed/letter saying they have bought the debt etc etc.

 

What do i do now, we have sent our defence earlier than the post arriving typical. Is my defence the same and is this the docs i asked for in the CPR 31.14 because its just a load of copies of docs i keep getting off them when i CCA'd them.

 

Blimey, just get in from work faced with this and a sick child as well, someone up there is testing me!!:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rogermeard. Given that we know who's involved now, could you delete all your personal and account references and post up the documents?

 

I think that really would help the experts take your case to another level and get a bit closer to filleting their donkey (gulp).

 

Are any of the documents new?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry too much about the letter today, if/when it gets to the next stage AQs, you will require them to produce all the documents they will be relying on.

 

when you have some time you could post up what they have sent, you can upload the scans to photobucket, and paste the link into your thread, theres no rush, and you dont have to, try to chill:cool:

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

The docs are all just the same stuff i have had on 3 seperate occasions from them, the only new bit is stapled to the alleged agreement which states terms etc, but i don't hold much interest in that particular document;).

 

I guess this will end up in a hearing. So i'm sitting tight for now.......will chillout but a tad stressed today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO RELEVANCE TO THIS CASE, HOWEVER SOMETHING TO REALLY CHEER ME UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..............

 

 

I checked my current account online today to see what i had in there and was totally shocked!!!!!!!

 

I have had for over 8 yrs an arranged/authorised overdraft of £3850 which i am usually well into.

 

However today overnight my Overdraft has changed from £3850 down to £900 leaving me nearly £2600 in an UNAUTHORISED overdraft which they are demanding back at 10% a month and my account is on hold, i can't buy food or anything and i have been told to phone their Customer relations Dept on monday as i may have a case for reinstating my OD as they never wrote me any letters online or by paper.

 

Has this happened to many people , it just seems a way of claiming extra payments back at customers expense, i am completely stuffed now. Been with them for over 20 years, thats customer service for you!!!!!!

 

If i open an account with someonelse will i be accepted as i am a debtor to the Halifax overnight!!!!!!!!!!

 

WHAT A WEEK.............

Link to post
Share on other sites

All banks are doing this now, they want to reduce the amount owed to them by debtors, at the same tome gaining more revenue, however they should have given you notice of their intentions, and made some sort of arrangement to reduce the overdraft limit over time....maybe you can reach an agreement with them on monday on this

 

Following that open a new account with a bank unconnected with any of your creditors. (if you have other creditors who are connected to your bank, they will use the offset clause, to clear your account in favour of their debt)

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, i keep warning people on here that when they begin defaulting on obligations, to take all necessary precautions to protect themselves (i.e. a parachute bank account, where all your income goes in, and only priority payments go out), this does not include "unsecured debt"

 

They dont always take the advice, and thats where they end up in this sort of situation

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what your saying, but my current account is nothing to do with any of my debt, only the official arranged/authorised overdraft that i have had for more than 8 years and it was them that gave it to me, i didn't ask for it either. I have done nothing wrong with my account or anything it's just them they have changed it overnight NO warning what so ever. To make it worse its my tax payer money that is keeping these going!!!.

 

I feel totally abused and robbed, its like being mugged legally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...