Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Powergen/e-on back dated gas charges since 2005


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5831 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

Your help is greatly appreciated and sought after.

We moved to our current property on 31st January 2005 and have been with Powergen/e-on supplying our gas and we paid the bills on a quarterly meter.

In May 2007 I decided to change suppliers after a comparison online showed another supplier to be cheaper. I signed up online and a few weeks later received a letter from P/e-on asking for the final meter reading, which I rang up and supplied, only to be told that the final bill would be £790.

As you can imagine I almost fell off my chair. After a lot of going from one department and another I was finally told that since the day we moved in 31/01/2005, we have had estimated bills.

When I pushed them further to tell me why no one had read the meter in all this time I was told that the meter was inaccessible. The meter has always been located in a white lock up type box under the bay window to the outside of our property.

There was no way I could pay that huge an amount of money and change suppliers. So I have been stuck with P/e-on on a Pre-Payment meter paying off arrears at £10 a week on a very high tariff. They will not offer a better tariff to me as I still have outstanding arrears. As you can see I am being penalised twice for someone else’s mistake.

I have read some of the other posts and there is some sort of governing body setup which states that since 2006, back dated bills can only be claimed for 12 months??

I would like to know what options are open to me and how to try and get some or all of this money back as I’m on benefits.

Apologies for it being so long but wanted to get all info and facts correct.

Thanks

Started claim with Halifax on 30/04/08

Sent 1st letter for bank charges and interest

 

If this has been helpful then please give the Scales a click. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The back-billing rule won't help you on this occasion I'm afraid, as it only covers situations where no bills at all have been sent and the utility company is at fault. In this instance, you have been sent bills, they've just been wrong.

 

You won't be able to get a reduction on this amount (unless you get hold of a high-up supervisor in a very good mood), but as you're on benefits you will be able to have the weekly collection rate reduced to about £3. You'll need to discuss this with the supplier's collections team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the time the engineer set the amount of £10, he said this is the lowest he could do and to get in touch with customer services.

Since then I have on many occasions tried to get the weekly arrears amount of £10 down to something like £5. As per there request even sent of proof on 2 separate occasions and still nothing.

The other matter concerns the fact that until the arrears are paid off, they will keep me on there higher tariff. Any ideas about this?

Are they correct in setting a higher tariff when you have arrears bearing in mind that I’m on a pre-payment meter?

Thanks

Started claim with Halifax on 30/04/08

Sent 1st letter for bank charges and interest

 

If this has been helpful then please give the Scales a click. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't be able to get a reduction on this amount (unless you get hold of a high-up supervisor in a very good mood), but as you're on benefits you will be able to have the weekly collection rate reduced to about £3. You'll need to discuss this with the supplier's collections team.

 

Any one know of a high-up supervisor or director for Powergen/e-on??

 

Any help would be brilliant.

 

Thanks

Started claim with Halifax on 30/04/08

Sent 1st letter for bank charges and interest

 

If this has been helpful then please give the Scales a click. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Your benefits office should be able to negotiate for you, there are linked departments between them and suppliers. The rate should be £3.00 p.w. as stated previously, so it should not be any hassle.

 

I really don't like like idea of estimated reads on an accessible meter box. If I were you I would pursue this to the end, as that is what has created your problem.

 

To me, that is "unbilled" as there is no reason why it shouldn't have been.

 

This scenario is getting more typical of these bullying tactics, forcing people into debt where previously there wasn't any.

 

Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

Does anyone have a good point of contact with e.on that they are aware of that gets things done??

If not then I will be writing to the e.on CEO UK Dr Paul Golby.

I will keep you posted as to what happens.

Thanks

Started claim with Halifax on 30/04/08

Sent 1st letter for bank charges and interest

 

If this has been helpful then please give the Scales a click. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pauline and Stuart (sorry cannot give surnames on a forum) are the section managers on prepayment based in Bolton. they are the managers of the managers.

 

To be honest from your posts this is somthing a normal CSA should be able to deal with, if not then a team manager should deal.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A more comprehensive reply.

In May 2007 I decided to change suppliers after a comparison online showed another supplier to be cheaper. I signed up online and a few weeks later received a letter from P/e-on asking for the final meter reading, which I rang up and supplied, only to be told that the final bill would be £790.

 

As you can imagine I almost fell off my chair. After a lot of going from one department and another I was finally told that since the day we moved in 31/01/2005, we have had estimated bills.

Double check these dates and if they were all estimated, if so this is over 2 years, the supplier should of had an actual reading in a two year period or the bill is not enforceable.

 

The meter being inaccessible is not acceptable if the meter is outside and this must of been an assumption from their part rather than being based on an engineers report.

 

On a prepayment meter you are charged a standing charge of about 18 pence a day as this is a prepayment tarrif, you are not charged more for being in debt apart from the debt collection rate, this can be found on your meter settings screen 25,26 and total amount on 27 (press and hold in button A untill it bleeps then scroll through the menu's)

 

Mree is correct regarding the unbilled charges, these charges are billed but they may not be lawfull if based on estimations for over a 2 year period.

 

You will remain on that tarrif untill the meter is changed, again nothing to do with your debt.

 

As previously advised if you are on benifits then the collection rate will be dropped to 3 pound a week.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

Does anyone know if this 12 month max backdating rule mentioned above also applies to other utilities Co's?

 

In my case it is the Water Board who I have just realised haven't been billing me for over 3 years. The law of common sense seems to say its their own stupid fault for not billing the address and managing their business effectively, but I'm sure its the little guy who gets clobbered and has to cough up as usual - well they have dividends to pay and massive bonuses for fat cats!!!

 

Any insight would be gratefully received.

 

Thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...