Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks DX , true I was reading it as my own licence when I can now see it is the VED thanks for the clarification. As for the payments that does make sense and I will give them a call today. I have to watch the date as I have 21 days from the 29th May to respond to plea of guilty or not.
    • This is the latest response from IDR. I know exactly what has happened - I left Qatar in 2006 leaving behind card debt of QAR13,000 (unintentionally, I thought it was paid off). When I visited Qatar for a weekend in 2012, I was blocked from leaving the country - ended up having to go to the Court, met with the bank and negitiated a settlement  - they wanted about QAR90,000 in total and supposedly agreed on QAR40,000 to settle completely. Unfortunately, I only have a pay-in receipt for that and no confirmation the whole debt was settled: I was so focussed on getting the exit ban lifted. Anyway, I left and I have visited Qatar since then with no issue. My concern is that the statute of limitations  will run from 2012, rather than 2006. Should I continue to ignore or explain to IDR that I don't agree there is an exisiting debt? IDR 10062024 redacted.pdf
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • as with some of your threads in the past. you are not reading things carefully and understanding things properly by going off on assumptions. not sure where you are getting your driving licence is being revoked from? nowhere do they use that word. nothing to do with it. vehicle excise licence. (Road Tax), a VEL cannot be revoked only voided. you are also wrong and nowhere does the DVLA state they cancelled the DD.  the court summons clearly states in the DVLA statement: it was your cancelling/reclaim of the DD on 15-02-2024 that caused this, NOTHING to do with the DVLA, they did not revoke the VEL. as they received no payment, on 02.05.2024 the VEL was Voided. it appears you have got the new DD setup wrong to the wrong DVLA account/ref number/VEL number. they have not received the payments to the correct VEL. i would be ringing DVLA and finding out where these payments are on their system and get them attributed to the correct VEL. that should solve the problem.
    • Its UK customers must now pay £1.99 to return clothes, with the cost deducted from their refund.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Blair, Oliver & Scott and an old joint loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5835 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Very interested in all your cases as I too am having problems with BOS.

 

Just over two years ago my partner of 6 years and mother of my daughter left me, the worst period of my life without doubt.

I arranged a meeting to sort out how we would split everything financially, and even though she had given up work when we met and I provided everything (including £15k deposit for our house from the sale of my house) I agreed to split evrything 50/50.

 

She moved in with the guy she'd been seeing and I moved back into the house while I , as she was still out of work, continued to pay our mortgage and all our joint debts that we incurred after being made redundant some months before.

 

The only debt that she was responsible for was a loan taken out to pay off her credit cards to the tune of around £10k that she had run up before we met.

As she wasn't working we had to get this loan in joint names, which is where my issue really starts.

 

Unknown to me she just didn't bother paying it I am now trying to remortgage to pay her off and all the debts, but in conjunction with the credit crunch am finding it increasingly difficult to do so with the default now against my name.

 

To prevent legal action I have agreed to pay BOS £100 a month hoping that I can get it all paid off when I remortgage.

I have read through the stickies in this section but would appreciate any advice could get.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wiltz,

 

The first thing you need to do is find out if the debt is legally enforceable.

To this end you need to send them a request under the Consumer Credit Act.

I couldn't find it in the templates library, so here's the one I sent them:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

With reference to the above account, I request that you send me a true copy of this credit agreement before I will correspond further on this matter.

 

This is my right under the legislation contained within section 77 (1) and section 78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and I am entitled to receive a copy of my credit agreement on request.

 

Your obligation also extends to providing me with a statement of account. I enclose a £1 postal order, which represents payment of the statutory fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act. I understand that a copy of my credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days from the date of this letter.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act, creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

Also, since you are a Debt Collection Agency, I would also ask that you supply a signed true copy of the executed deed of assignment for the above referenced agreement. This is an obligation, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

 

In summary, I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THIS DEBT AND THEREFORE REQUIRE YOU TO SUBSTANTIATE THIS BY PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION BEFORE I CORRESPOND FURTHER :

 

1. True copy of original credit agreement

2. Statement of account

3. Copy of the executed deed of assignment from (Amend as appropriate) and Blair Oliver Scott Ltd.

 

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

 

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested.

 

Further to the above, please ensure that any contact by yourselves is made in writing only to the above address.

 

I look forward to hearing from you within the statutory time limit.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Once you've sent them this, they have 12 working days + 2 days in which to reply. After this, they have a further 30 calendar days after which they have committed a criminal offence if they can't supply this agreement. Until they have done so, they are not entitled to take enforcement action, but you might still be wise to make a token payment to them during this time.

 

When you get a reply from them, scan it in and post it on this thread so that others can have a look and advise you about the legality or otherwise of it.

 

In the meantime, NEVER talk to them on the 'phone. If they ask you for security details, refuse to give them and insist that everything is in writing. The other thing that people are being advised to do is not sign your letters - just initial them or something.

 

You send them a £1.00 postal order and make sure you send it recorded delivery.

 

Any other problems, just post it up here and someone will be along to help.

 

 

Hope this helps.

 

Regards.

 

 

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for that Fred, my letter is going out today.

 

As suggested have just made my token payment so I hopefully shouldn't need to make another.

 

How is it that they tend to lose or never have the signed credit agreements?

It's frightening to think that organisations like these can be so poorly administrated and managed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're right Wiltz and had it not been for the fact that they're all so greedy this would probably never have come to light.

It's only because of organisations like the CAG that it has.

 

So many of them have blundered in an enormous way and it serves them right.

The only pity is that the people like us who are now fighting them are just the tip of the iceberg.

 

I wish you luck in the battles ahead. Remember NEVER speak to them on the 'phone.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well update to this and a tactic I wasn't suspecting. I have today received a letter from the Halifax, with whom the original loan was taken out, which reads as below:

 

"Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter which we received 02 June 2008 and was passed to us by Blair, Oliver & Scott Ltd.

 

We have ordered a copy of your agreement, terms & conditions and statements for the above noted account as requested in your letter. These will be forwarded pon to you upon receipt.

 

Please note the account has not been sold to Blair, Oliver & Scott Ltd and we are now dealing with the administration of the account, therefore there is no need for a deed of assignment.

 

Should you have any further queries regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Manager Legal Section."

 

My immediate gut reaction is that there was no deed of assignment issued and therefore the debt was not enforceable so they took it back. However, can anyone tell me that if they do provide the original Credit agreement and the staements is the fact that they did pass it across without still an area for me to pursue?

 

Would appreciate even more excellent advice from you guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no need for them to provide a 'deed' of assignment, that is a contract between Halifax and Blair O & S....what you mean is the 'notice' of assignment which Halifax should have sent you when they sold the debt on....also you should have received a notice from Blair O & S saying they had purchased the debt.....you should have received a default notice too....

 

Wait until they respond to the CCA request first....(no doubt there will be some excessive charges too !!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blair (bank ) Oliver (of) Scott (scotland) are the same company they are the in house DCA so the debt never went any where.Therfore no NOA needed

 

Regards

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...