Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Orange VAT


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5851 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I am seeking advice on the following:

 

I will keep this simple. Six months ago I signed up for a new orange contract in a phones for you store. The contract i signed which i have copies of, clearly states that the price is £35 including VAT. However i have noticed that i have been charged on my bills £35 + VAT.

As this is a breech of the terms and conditions of the contract can i legally terminate the contract and if so what is the best way of doing so?

I dont wish to continue the contract after reading various posts on here and other similar websites.

 

Thanks in Advance

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write a letter to them explaining what has happened. Enclose, with your letter, a copy of the contract you have with the bit about the charge highlighted.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So does that mean that you are being charged £41.13 for your monthly line rental total? I only ask as that is a rather odd figure for a tariff, it's usually whole figures ie £35. It's maybe just a billing error, contact Orange to see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The tarrif i am on is Dolphin 35. It is a personal tarrif not a business one. Yes the bill amount is £41.13 every month since the contract started, then with additional charges (ie calls to numbers outside of inclusive minutes). It seems to end up being about £50-60 every month. I have had a reply from the email i sent through their website but it doesnt even acknowledge the fact i want to cancel the contract or offer any solution to the problem. It only advises me to call 150 but from reading other posts on the internet i dont think that will get me anywhere. i am going to send a letter, recorded delivery with copies of contract etc tomorrow and see where that gets me.

 

My question here is, can i legaly terminate my contract because of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Dolphin 35 tariff is not designed for business use and prices are quoted inclusive of VAT. The tariff has two prices, depending on how you signed up... £35 directly at a retailer, or £30 online. Apart from the monthly fee, the bundles provided with each are identical. So, if your monthly fee is £41.13, you are either charged an additional £11.13 or £6.13 depending on how you signed up.

 

Assuming you signed up in-store, there is a possibility you have Orange's own insurance package as part of the monthly plan (sorry, I don't know the current price for this) and this is why it looks higher. The best route is to call 150 and ask what additional services have been added to the monthly subscription due to the cost discrepancy.

 

Email responses from any mobile network are usually ineffective, either missing the point entirely or only answeing part of it. Calling them for free during off-peak hours is more productive. There is little to be gained from sending wads of paper to Orange, especially when all an operator needs to do is check your account and answer your query.

 

As to your last question, can you legally end your contract? Nope, if there is an error they have to fix it but it's not an excuse to get out of the other obligations contained within it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

On page 3 of your bill, it will give you break down of your charges. your Dolphin 35 will have a value on the right hand side of £29.79, (all items listed here are exclusive of vat) then other items, both free and chargeable will be listed. If there is something there to the tune of £3.40 (£5 incl) then it is a bundle and could be for Data or something similar.

 

Then there will be the extra call/out of bundle charges. These could be where you have gone over your minutes, made international calls, sent pictures messages or anything like that.

 

The final line will give you your total, Exclusive of VAT. Then if there is insurance at £6.00 that will be iteminsed (insurance is a non-vat product)

 

so with Dolphin 35 with insurance, but no other extras or call charges your total would come to £41.00.

 

Just check the very top line - if it says the amount of £29.79, all is correct with that aspect of it, you will just need to see where the other charges are coming from.

 

Emails sent to the Orange website are only to do with the website and would land in the webmasters inbox, nothing to do with Customer Services. Emails sent to the Correspondence Dept are responded to in exactly the same way as letters, with an acknowlegment usually within 7 days. Unlike letters though, due to DPA they cannot be dealt with when it is ref account specific information due to there not being a signature.

 

Your best bet is to actually ring the billing dept with a copy of your bill in front of you and they will go through it with you step by step and explain all the entries and put your mind at rest. Alternatively an Orange Dealership would be able to help also.

 

Hope that helps

Anything I post is my own opinion and views based on experience. My posts may not represent the views of my Employer, work collegues, or my Mum, i thought them up all by myself!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thankyou for that. I have found that they are charging me extra for "chargeable umltd ev & wk ow" which is a bundle i have never signed up for and has been on since my first bill. I actually have two accounts, one for my partner which started a few months after mine and the same thing is on that account too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy - you'll find this was probably offered to you free of charge at the beginning, and you had to cancel it once the offer expired... if you didn't, the monthly fee for it was applied!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? You'd better keep quiet about that - insurance has had a VAT rate of 5% for at least 6 years now....

 

 

Erm, are you getting it confused with "Insurance Premium tax" (IPT) which if my memory serves me right has been around for about 5-6 yrs and is nothing to do with "Value Added Tax"

Where is the value added in an insurance premium ?

Just thought I would point that out

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, are you getting it confused with "Insurance Premium tax" (IPT) which if my memory serves me right has been around for about 5-6 yrs and is nothing to do with "Value Added Tax"

 

Fine, if you want to call a spade a shovel. The cost of IPT is 5% (17.5% if holiday insurance) and inexplicably is charged at VAT rates. As the point being made was that insurance is not 'exempt' from tax, the post remains pertinent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fine, if you want to call a spade a shovel. The cost of IPT is 5% (17.5% if holiday insurance) and inexplicably is charged at VAT rates. As the point being made was that insurance is not 'exempt' from tax, the post remains pertinent.

Fine, if you want to split hairs and try to confuse the issue with your superior knowledge albiet with rather uneccesary info to this post!:rolleyes:

 

my point in entering "non vat product" was as an explanation to why it would be listed seperately. that insurance was not included with other vat chargeable costs as it is not charged the normal vat rate of 17.5% vat. this was to ensure that if the OP wanted to work out their bill they would only add the vat to the upper section of charges, then to add on the £6, then hopefully finding the correct amount of their bill.

 

I am sure we will now witness a long winded debate as usual!!!

 

Anyway, I am glad the issue has been resolved and refunded in full for you Andy, as did expect that the data bundle would be the likely cause of the 'extras'

Anything I post is my own opinion and views based on experience. My posts may not represent the views of my Employer, work collegues, or my Mum, i thought them up all by myself!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fine, if you want to split hairs and try to confuse the issue with your superior knowledge albiet with rather uneccesary info to this post!

 

There's little point discussing it if all you're going to dois stamp your feet and throw a huff. What you call 'haur splitting' was simply a clarification. Insurance is no longer tax free and it was THIS point that was being made - not where Orange would happen to itemise it on their invoices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...