Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Another fine mess! Any advise?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5834 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Another one for my hubby!

 

He does wrought iron and has his own business. He fitted some gates yesterday and wired them up, but was due to finish the wiring on Monday. A builder who was on site asked hubby what was stopping the gates swinging out onto the street so hubby showed him.

 

He received a phone call this morning from the lady who ownes the house, stating that one of the gates has swung out into the street and swung into this builders car. He said it was impossible and went up to investigate. He is sure that someone has been stood on them swinging on it as the weld had snapped right off and the gate had dropped. The builder said the gate was blowing about when he got there (these are huge estate gates that needs 2 people to lift, hence the reason they are electric), and as he was walking up the drive the weld snapped off and the gate crashed into his car. He is now demanding hubby's liability insurance details.

 

Now short of calling this man a liar, it is possible that kids could have been swinging on it, where does hubby stand, as he is 100% certain that the wind didn't blow the gate. He has been in this business nearly 20 years, and has run this business for 6, this is the first time anything like this has ever happened to him as he is diligent in his work.

 

I would appreciate any advise given.

 

Many thanks.

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Bottom line, there is no legal obligation to disclose his Public Liability insurers details (Indeed, with only a few exceptions there is no legal obligation to hold PL. However, VERY unwise not to.) Disclosing his PL details to this builder could invalidate your husband's cover as it could be construed as admitting liability and prejudicing the insurer's position.

 

The onus is on the builder to prove, if necessary in a court of law, that the incident happened. Public Liability covers your husband's LEGAL LIABILITY in respect of injuries to persons or their property arising from your husband's business.

 

Ask the builder to put his allegations in writing and you should pass this correspondence unanswered to your insurer, advising them of full details of the circumstances and your suspicions.

 

It is not up to you to disprove, it's up to him to prove.

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

What condition and year is the van shell? I am thinking what your thinking.

 

Ha ha, a J reg rust bucket, and yes you are :lol: Hubby has also just told me that the builder asked if he could park on the drive as he didn't trust his handbrake on the hill!

 

Helford, thank very much for the advise, he is going to do this and also knock on a few of the neighbours houses to see if they saw anything.

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add... if the builder said he saw the gates swinging when he arrived why did he park where he did?:confused:

 

Sounds to me like he is bang at it.

 

Your husband secured the gates and showed the builder how they were secured. If the builder had any doubts about it surely he would of mentioned it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies everyone, it is true that he is not dealing with the brightest star in the sky. I will let you know what happens tomorrow :-D

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well hubby has seen the dent and said that you need a telescope to see it! He has had a quote and he said it is £200 including the hire of a car when his car is in.

 

Hubby reported everything to the police, but surprise surprise, it is a civil matter (criminal damage if you ask me). His insurance company have told him that as his excess is £250 then they would advise to do it without involving the insurance. They would class it as an act of god, and if it went to court then hubby could end up at looking to pay out over £1000 as there was no witnesses.

 

Hubby has agreed to pay up to £200 on production of a valid receipt for the work. I am fuming!

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your hubby should check on autotrader to see if the van is actually worth £200...

 

Did the van have any other dents in it? If it was in immaculate condition, then I understand him wanting to get the dent fixed, but I'm sure this van must have other damage in 16 years?

 

If the builder knew the gate was "swinging lose", then could your hubby not claim £200 in damages against the builder for damaging the gate by parking his van infront of it when he knew the gate was swinging!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would disbute that the gates actually caused the damage in the first place! let him take you to small claims court! he would have to prove this what happened. and you would have an oppotunity to put your side about showing him the gates operation etc.

I dont think he would bother?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

just a thought, as the Police state its a civil matter, how about your hubby reporting it as an "Attempt deception" and attempted insurance fraud?? ;) The Police would be legally obliged to make enquiries. There seems to be holes all over the place with the builders terms of events ( and probably his van ) and as previously stated, if he "SAW" the gates swinging, why park next to it?

Friendship costs nothing but its rewards can be priceless. Do not judge, as you will not be judged but if you can, try and assist where possible.:smile:

everyone is entitled to MY opinion!:D

I offer my comments without prejudice or liability.

If you found my advice helpful, please click the scales at the top.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is a fairly technical problem that would need the input of your husband to resolve.

 

He does wrought iron and has his own business. He fitted some gates yesterday and wired them up, but was due to finish the wiring on Monday.

 

Do you mean your husband only partially 'wired' up the gates as it appears he didn't do so fully as he was going to finish it on the Monday?

 

One has to assume that for over the weekend there was a weakness in this gate structure.

 

He is sure that someone has been stood on them swinging on it as the weld had snapped right off and the gate had dropped. The builder said the gate was blowing about when he got there (these are huge estate gates that needs 2 people to lift, hence the reason they are electric),

 

Did your husband see anybody swinging on the gates?

 

Welding joints can quite easily snap away if they are not welded correctly in the first place, however, I'm sure your husband is aware of this.

 

Also, it may take 30 men to erect a scaffold yet one gust of wind can bring the whole lot down. That is no guarantee of security just as two men fitting a gate isn't either.

 

Was it a windy day on the 18th April up north?

 

Now short of calling this man a liar, it is possible that kids could have been swinging on it,

 

What does your husband think? He's the expert.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, thanks for all the replies.

 

Weird, thanks for all the imput, he is sure someone had been swinging on them, as I said in his almost 20 years of doing this, it has never happened before. As neither of them have any proof, he is just going to pay for the damage and put it down to experience. As far as I can understand the wiring was all done, it was a couple of adjustments that needed doing, it was actually an electrician that he uses regularly who was doing it aswell.

 

Ah well, you live and learn.

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

really about the only thing I can say about this is 'what a bad day'. If there is no proof of how it happened, and even if it was kids, the owner of the gates would be liable for damages as I see it.

 

Has the issue been resolved? And if so, what came to be?

 

Linda

Edited by barracad
commercial link removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the builder hasn't been heard of since! After hubby agreed to pay for the van to be 'fixed' on production of a valid receipt for the work, it went strangely quiet..............funny that..............;)

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...