Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left a trustpilot review and P2g have emailed me with the obligatory apology and have refunded the postage costs and are will to give £10 extra pre pay as a good will gesture. However,  as i wrote this the Buyer has just txt.me.to say they have received the parcel !  So obviously im now going.to suggest that she pays via Paypal ... I rang her this morning to see if it had arrived but she said she was on holiday and there was someone in her house she would have to contact to see if it had arrived which she obviously has ... So now i know its been delivered i cant go for P2g But i Can accept the exta £10 ...
    • The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go.com Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper via the Defendant's service containing which contained two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with  under  tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was The Defendant informed me that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks I was informed by the courier that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. The Claimant did not purchase the Defendant's insurance policy as requiring people to pay extra for rights already guaranteed under the consumer rights act 2015 is contrary to section 57 and 72 and therefore unenforceable. The Claimant rejected the Defendant's standard compensation offer. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   By failing to ensure the safe delivery of the Claimant's parcel the Defendant breached section 49 of the CRA 2015.   AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £370.00 being the value of the lost goods £xx.xx being the price of shipping and interest pursuant to s69 cca 1984.   See what BF thinks but I think something like this is better. Remember you are suing P2G not evri.
    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKCPS (Huddersfield)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5760 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, as you can see I'm new. I've seen a few people having a problem with this company and I am one of them.

 

I've recently got a ticket from UKCPS stating I was issued a ticket on March 10th for being parked @ a garage in Leeds.

 

To my despair they said that a ticket was stuck to my car windscreen that day. Now I cannot recall being at that certain car park on that day and I don't even know where it is and I definately didn't get a ticket or I would have seen it.

 

I tried calling them for about 1 hour today and eventually some akward person answered the phone out of breath. I explained to him I did not recieve a ticket on my windscreen or I would have paid the ticket by now. But he insisted I would have had one. I asked him also which car park I was in and he explained it, that it was on near a roundabout in Leeds.

 

I told him I didn't know where it was and he blatantly said I would have known where it is because I live in Leeds, (does it mean that wherever you live you know all your places) he then asked me how long I lived in Leeds, (Strange question to ask) I told him 2 years then again he said I should know where the roundabout is.

 

Again I refused to know where it is because I really don't know where it is. I started getting a bit hot headed, but not abusive ie swearing etc (usually in my nature but not today) telling the guy I honestly didn't know where it was and that he was putting words in my mouth as saying I knew where it was.

 

He then asked am I disputing the ticket I said yes and he said He will see me in court. He also said to me stop being abusive which I replied " Abusive??? I haven't even swore once how can I be abusive I bet you have had worse."

 

He then proceded that he will see me in court if I don't pay the fine, I said ok then thats fine, and he started to explain that if I put in a dispute with the payment then I wouldn't have to go to court, which at this time I just hung up on him.

 

Now where do I stand now??? The guy was so akward and I was getting really cheesed off with his attitude especially about me knowing where the car park was, when I really didn't.

RIP My Little Angel Callam, Still Born 30th October 2007. Mummy and Daddy Will Always Miss You. YNWA xXx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You have not committed any offence and you’ve been ticketed by a private company whose tickets have no status unless a case is brought at the expense of the issuer in a civil court. Under no circumstances get involved in any so-called "appeals procedure".

The "charge" is alleged under contract law. Despite what they may call it, what you have is an "invoice" (a decidedly dodgy one at that) from a private parking company who allege you have breached their terms and conditions by failing to park in accordance with their rules. The ticket is not backed up by statute, unlike those issued by councils and police.

The “ticket” is virtually unenforceable and the truth is that the Parking Company will probably not even try to enforce it by legal action. Instead they will use debt collectors who will threaten references to credit agencies, personal visits by bailiffs and removal of property. These threats have no foundation. The reality is they would need to bring civil litigation in the county court against the driver and prove a breach of prominently displayed terms and conditions. They will go to the DVLA to identify the registered keeper of the vehicle but you have no responsibility to tell them who was driving (even if it was you) and enforcement can only take place against the driver. These cases are largely dealt with by threats and bluster rather than any real action on the basis that most people pay up to avoid hassle.

Don’t be a mug – stand firm don’t be bullied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, I've jsut seen the templates for the letters, I will be using one to write back to them, will let you know how I get on.

RIP My Little Angel Callam, Still Born 30th October 2007. Mummy and Daddy Will Always Miss You. YNWA xXx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just recieved another letter from these people and the fine is getting bigger £135, when it was £96,. SHould I chose to ignore this letter as I did the previous one??? I was thinking of writing today to them denying the claim as I know I did not get a parking ticket on my car at all!!!

 

Please help anyone.

RIP My Little Angel Callam, Still Born 30th October 2007. Mummy and Daddy Will Always Miss You. YNWA xXx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just recieved another letter from these people and the fine is getting bigger £135, when it was £96,. SHould I chose to ignore this letter as I did the previous one??? I was thinking of writing today to them denying the claim as I know I did not get a parking ticket on my car at all!!!

 

Please help anyone.

 

Don't write. Don't play their game. You have an invoice for an alleged breach of contract. You've excercised your right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself.

 

The onus of proof is them. They have to prove your car was where they said it was and the alleged breach occurred. Then they have to find the driver. They also have to prove the amount involved is not a penalty charge and so on.

 

Please note you are not being fined. Only a court can impose a fine.

 

As has been pointed out this is an invoice for an alleged breach of contract. The remedy for breach of contract is damages and any increase in the amount claimed will be interest (normally set at 8% p.a.). The court would dismiss any further amount.

 

This is just another threatening letter from people who are trying to frighten and intimidate.

 

If you feel you want to do something write back using the template letters. Admit nothing and deny your liability. You are under NO legal obligation to help them or to incriminate yourself.

 

Stand firm and this lot will eventually go away.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't write. Don't play their game. You have an invoice for an alleged breach of contract. You've excercised your right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself.

 

The onus of proof is them. They have to prove your car was where they said it was and the alleged breach occurred. Then they have to find the driver. They also have to prove the amount involved is not a penalty charge and so on.

 

Please note you are not being fined. Only a court can impose a fine.

 

As has been pointed out this is an invoice for an alleged breach of contract. The remedy for breach of contract is damages and any increase in the amount claimed will be interest (normally set at 8% p.a.). The court would dismiss any further amount.

 

This is just another threatening letter from people who are trying to frighten and intimidate.

 

If you feel you want to do something write back using the template letters. Admit nothing and deny your liability. You are under NO legal obligation to help them or to incriminate yourself.

 

Stand firm and this lot will eventually go away.

 

 

OK I think I should ignore it then tbh thanks!!! WIll let you know what is happening.

RIP My Little Angel Callam, Still Born 30th October 2007. Mummy and Daddy Will Always Miss You. YNWA xXx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Julian Fiddlepot

Beware of not saying who was driving. You could well be on the receiving end of a Norwich Pharmacal order, compelling you by law to reveal that information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beware of not saying who was driving. You could well be on the receiving end of a Norwich Pharmacal order, compelling you by law to reveal that information.

 

 

In the highly unlikely event that one is sought it will be responded to appropriately.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the highly unlikely event that one is sought it will be responded to appropriately.

 

A very funny legal fantasy by Mr Fiddlepot!

 

In the first case the (very large) costs for such an order have to be paid for by the claimant under all circumstances, not the defendant. It's only relevant to big cases involving tens of thousands of pounds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Julian Fiddlepot
A very funny legal fantasy by Mr Fiddlepot!

 

In the first case the (very large) costs for such an order have to be paid for by the claimant

 

....and eventually by the parking offender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

....and eventually by the parking offender.

 

Now you're being very silly :)

 

Here's the info anyway. In Car Park Manager Fantasy Land you would need to prove a cause of action against the registered keeper (eg. that he was a passenger perhaps?), and that the registered keeper won't be harmed in some way in providing this information (ie. his wife won't slap him round the chops for giving the game away).

 

Further the registered keeper would be entitled to ask that you pay his costs to defend the action. In the unlikely event that you are successful, you are thousands out of pocket without a chance of obtaining the cost from the "offender".

 

Norwich Pharmacal Co. v The Commissioners of Customs and Excise

 

In short, nobody has ever done this for parking, and noone ever will do it. Still it was an entertaining diversion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SO does that mean I still ignore the letters??? Which I will do anyways, my father keep telling me to pay it or take it to a police station or across the path from us there's a police officer and show it to him, but i keep telling my father to ignore it don't worry, he just worries too much I think.

RIP My Little Angel Callam, Still Born 30th October 2007. Mummy and Daddy Will Always Miss You. YNWA xXx

Link to post
Share on other sites

£75 +VAT as far as I'm aware.

 

What is £75+VAT??? You must be joking mate it is £135+VAT and £3 per day its not been paid

RIP My Little Angel Callam, Still Born 30th October 2007. Mummy and Daddy Will Always Miss You. YNWA xXx

Link to post
Share on other sites

SO does that mean I still ignore the letters??? Which I will do anyways, my father keep telling me to pay it or take it to a police station or across the path from us there's a police officer and show it to him, but i keep telling my father to ignore it don't worry, he just worries too much I think.

 

Yes, ignore it. Tell your father it's a [problem]. And ignore Fiddlepot and his friends.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is £75+VAT??? You must be joking mate it is £135+VAT and £3 per day its not been paid

The £3 per day is a fantasy. Even if it did reach court and by a miracle you lost you would pay the original amount claimed and some interest (8% p.a.) £158.62 * 8%=£12.69 £12.69/365 = £0.03 per day.

 

I'd suggest not feeding our PPC Troll. He doesn't need feeding.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm starting to like Pi$$pot on here and Pepipoo.

 

It shows one thing - the PPCs are running so scared they CBA to even bother going to the trouble of showing court cases, just posting lies which is what they did before, so they are just cutting to the chase now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£75 + VAT for the Norwich Pharmacal order. An expensive game of silence to play.

 

I note with interest that my question remains unanswered.

 

Exactly what criminal offence has been committed on private property for there to be an offender?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note with interest that my question remains unanswered.

 

Exactly what criminal offence has been committed on private property for there to be an offender?

 

Still no answer???

 

Well I now looked for that date at work and I can confirm I was at work that day in Birmingham, so no matter what I wasn't there in Leeds!!! So if push comes to shove my boss will write a polite letter telling them I was working in Birmingham that day.

RIP My Little Angel Callam, Still Born 30th October 2007. Mummy and Daddy Will Always Miss You. YNWA xXx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right, I've just had another letter from the claiming £201 now, this time saying they have written to me on 3 previous occasions. It says the amount is now serious overdue and excess charges continue to be added. Also that I am strongly advised to pay immediately (All in red and bold letters).

 

I will continue to ignore the letters, as I will be moving house soon so I will not be getting the letters again.

RIP My Little Angel Callam, Still Born 30th October 2007. Mummy and Daddy Will Always Miss You. YNWA xXx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...