Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • While we wait for someone to explain how farage is any better than sunak  .. if not worse   One of many likely upcoming belly laughs   Reform chairman Richard Tice has accused the Tories of (reform like) “dirty tricks” after one of his party’s candidates withdrew his papers to stand at the last minute and endorsed former cabinet minister Sir Gavin Williamson. In a dramatic final 24 hours before nominations closed there had been fevered speculation that as many as six Tory MPs and other candidates could defect to Reform after Nigel Farage decided to stand in Clacton and become leader. But instead no Tories switched and Tom Wellings, the Reform candidate for the new seat of Stone, Great Wryly and Penkridge in Staffordshire, quit and put out a statement endorsing Sir Gavin.   Who does he think he is an Anderson, a Carswell !!! was heard at the reform HQ pub ... as Candidate brushed aside by Farage in clacton to run as an independent    Tice accuses Tories of ‘dirty tricks’ to persuade Reform candidates to stand down WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: A furious row has broken out after a Reform candidate’s last minute defection to the Tories   :ROFL  
    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request?   Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Equidebt CCA please


Wikkitt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5891 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have received a letter from Equidebt today, enclosed was the two scanned documents below and one years (2005) worth of statements.

 

 

EquidebtCCA.jpg?t=1206229643

 

EquidebtCCA2.jpg?t=1206229679

 

On the second page, the piece I have removed is my name printed by someone, but not me.

 

I was paying them through a DMC during 2005 and they were getting paid every month. From January 05 to September it states on each statments:

 

PLEASE MAKE PAYMENTS AS AGREED IN THE MONTHLY/WEEKLY REPAYMENT PROGRAME WHILST THIS PLAN IS BEING ADHERED TO

NO FURTHER ACTION WILL BE TAKEN.

 

INTEREST IS CHARGED DAILY AND WILL INCREASE THE LONGER PAYMENT IS DELAYED. IF YOUR ACCOUNT IS NOT FULLY CLEARED. INTEREST WILL BE CHARGED ON YOUR DAILY BALANCE. NOT JUST YOUR OUTSTANDING BALANCE. IF THE MINIMUM PAYMENT IS MADE YOUR ESTIMATED INTEREST FOR NEXT MONTH IS £0.00

Then on the October statement they added £25.00 arrears charge and £68.64 interest totaling £93.46, then they have written:

THE SITUATION ON YOUR ACCOUNT IS VERY SERIOUS. PLEASE CALL XXXX IMMEDIATELY

INTEREST IS CHARGED DAILY AND WILL INCREASE THE LONGER PAYMENT IS DELAYED. IF YOUR ACCOUNT IS NOT FULLY CLEARED. INTEREST WILL BE CHARGED ON YOUR DAILY BALANCE. NOT JUST YOUR OUTSTANDING BALANCE. IF THE MINIMUM PAYMENT IS MADE YOUR ESTIMATED INTEREST FOR NEXT MONTH IS £59.09

This is how every statement goes on until December 05, £25.00 arrears charge and interest. So I was paying them £23.14 every month. Starting balance in January was £4,198.08 and the balance in December was £4,216.98.

I paid them £254.54 over that year (2005)but the balance has increased by £18.90.

Can I claim back all the charges and interest?

Sorry this is a long post.

Wikkitt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Likethewallfatboy

 

Thank you I will send the letter about the correct terms that must be supplied, as they want me to phone to arrange a payment within 14 days.

 

I have seen the letter on another post.

 

Wikkitt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Well just an update.

 

The 12+2+30 days were up on 6th April.

 

I sent them the letter thanking them for the application form and that it had none of the prescribed terms and that it was unenfoceable.

 

Today I recieved another letter from them with the exact same papers as before, so I have sent the letter again about unenforceable, I feel like I'm going round in circles .

 

Wikkitt :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually you don't have to do anything, The debt is now in default and any action to persue the debt is an offence under the CCA 1974. If you wish to reclaim all the charges and interest it puts you in a strong position because the lack of a valid CA is a complete defence against a judge ruling it enforceable. They are also not allowed to add interest or charges to a debt that is in default, that alone constitutes an offence.

 

In order to do this though you would need to start court action to prove to the judge that the debt is unenforceable (no valid CA).

 

If you read around the site there is a wealth of information and examples of others who have done this.

 

Hope this helps. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...