Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital One Claim


kitkat35
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5867 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am in the process of claiming back charges from Capital One for both myself and my husband. I have obtained statements and prepared a schedule but wondered who I should address the preliminary letter to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Kitkat35.

 

On my court forms I used this address.

 

Capital One Bank (Europe) plc

PO Box 5281

Nottingham.

NG2 3HX.

 

When they replied to my court claim, they had Executive Office at the top.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick response. I did not think I could use a P O Box address as I wanted to send recorded delivery. Also I cannot find the preliminary letter template for credit card charges only bank charges. Does anyone know whether you just adapt that one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Kitkat.

 

Use this one.

 

Capital One Services Inc

Trent House

Station Street

Nottingham

NG2 3HX

And yes, just adapt the bank account one.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

We have just received Capital Ones response to initial request for payment letter.

 

Firstly they have stated how the OFT has not challenged the right of banks to charge default sums but I am confused as this claim relates to credit card charges. Secondly they have made an offer of the difference between the charges made and the £12 as recommended. I thought this may happen and we are not prepared to accept this.

 

The main problem is that they then go on to state that because we are currently behind in payment they are going to refund to the account to bring it up to date.

 

This account has been closed for a couple of years as it went to Debitas who collected on their behalf. As far as I can remember there may have been a lower settlement to clear the account. Just wondered if anyone had any advice as to how we should reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Send a letter from here...........

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the rejection letter, or send combined partial acceptance/LBA. When you get no joy from this (because you won't, they'll say its their final offer, no more, blah blah usual rubbish) then file N1 for the rest. They will then cough up fairly sharpish, if past exprience is anything to go by. If there is indeed a debt owing to them they will clear the balance and then send you anything thats left over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just received repeat offer from Capital One saying not prepared to increase. They have also stated that although the account has been closed for some time there is a balance shown as outstanding so they are entitled to pay the amount to the account. This is disputed as the account was passed to Debitas and they agreed to accept a figure as full and final settlement. What I need to know is whether Capital One can now claim this back as the debt was settled in full and final settlement. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The full and final settlement offer was from Debitas and not Capital One. It is unlikely we will still have any correspondence as it was back in 2004. At no time since that time have we had any contact from Capital One or Debitas stating that there is an outstanding balance. The account was closed in 2004 when it was defaulted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just claiming back the charges for my husband. Capital One are saying that because there is an outstanding balance on the account they are within their rights to deduct any refund from the account. The account has been closed for about four years when Debitas gave us a full and final settlement offer. We do not have any correspondence from then but neither Capital One or Debitas have ever said there is an outstanding balance on the account. Just not sure whether it is worth proceeding now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondered if it was better to issue proceedings via MCOL or at County Court. I know there were problems where claims were stayed because of the bank charges case but see that some people have been sucessful filing online.

 

Also wondered if anyone could please advise on suitable wording to incorporate in the Particulars of Claim regarding payment of claim. I was hoping to include to state that as the account had been closed and settled in full and final settlement that payment was to be made by cheque to the claimant. Any suggestions please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO I wouldn't even consider MCOL - there can be major problems even without the possibility of a stay.

 

There is a standard POC for CAp1 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/122528-credit-card-charges-poc.html

 

I wouldn't include the words "full and final settlement" - that is bound to cause confusion. You could specify a cheque but that might be best achieved when you discuss settlement with CAp1's solicitors

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...