Newlyn impersonating a bailiff, supported by Ealing Police, forced to pay

[Saffronflowers]

Hazza you have PM

[tomtubby]

Hazza

 

I have tried you twice today.....

[hazza]

v sorry, dodgy reception - pls try again - free till midnight, thx, h

[hazza]

can anyone help explain the law in terms of:

 

- a certificated bailiff's powers to direct someone else to carry out levy (over a phone)

- the law wrt levy on a shared driveway

- the law wrt to levy or move another vehicle to get access to another - the bailiff mentioned prima facia or something - I saw you get into that car, so I see it as yours, so I see it as mine

 

thx

[Guest Screw The Bailiff]

No, a bailiff cannot levy on goods over the phone, he must have gained entry to the property and come into physical contact with the goods.

 

Yes a bailiff can levy on private land, provided it doesn't deprive the land owner his use and enjoyment of that land e.g. by clamping a car at the exit of a shared driveway.

 

Prima facie means at first sight. It means a bailiff can levy on goods believing it belongs to the debtor unless evidence to the contrary arises. Bailiffs need to excercise care becasue if goodas or a vehicle is siezed and it does not belong to the debtor then the owner is entitled to reclaim his losses from the authority that instructed the bailiff.

 

Yes a bailiff can move things around to levy on goods. He cannot cause damage to goods.

[JonCris]

just checked the bailiff / director of newlyn - is a director/secretary of:

 

Boongate Motor Company Limited

Newlyn Group Holdings Limited

Boongate Kia Services Limited

Peterborough Hyundai Limited

Newlyn Plc

Murmac Builders Limited

Murmac Construction and Developments Limited

Brush & Graphics Limited

Point Two Four Limited

Typehome Limited

Anncombe Limited

Silverdene Limited

 

hmmmmm... it appears he sells cars, builds homes, paints a picture then visits them as a bailiff

 

I wonder if he's flogging, to one of his own companies, the things he repossess - if so he could be in deep do do

[IIIUMINATI]

question

if all the major items in the house have been purchased by a partner and the partner has receipts for the goods in there name dose that mean they are exempt from the bailiff ? TV Computer snooker table weight training equipment.

[Saffronflowers]

Yes - it means they are exempt as long as their name is not on the liabilty order or warrant.

 

SFx

[JonCris]

Yes - it means they are exempt as long as their name is not on the liabilty order or warrant.

 

SFx

 

 

& the receipts are genuine shop receipts

[IIIUMINATI]

i own nothing now

thanks

[hazza]

what is shocking is that one of the three Newlyn directors acted illegally

form 4 for sure

[noomill060]

bump.

 

any news ?

[hazza]

yes - a response to my complaint was received, but for some reason it was not a response to my complaint - just quoted hearsay - and contained a page and a half on the legalities of pcn's and the process they use. The parking clerk does love his job.

 

They did not answer my complaint, other than confirm to me that bailiff have lied to council wrt what happened, so harrow are claiming that they acted legally and bailiff were free to charge what they wanted...

 

however, it appears bailiff are claiming that the certficated bailiff aka dodgy car sales director came to my property, clamped my car, then legally went to off to another site - great multi-taskers these bailiffs are - then returned to mine to collect payment as you do while the police, clamper and myself waited for him - all rubbush - and looks like it's getting dirty

Edited March 31, 2009 by hazza

[hazza]

Dear Newlyn Plc / Newlyn Plc Solicitors - Sagem?,

 

I understand from Northampton Court that you are now looking directly at the CAG forums since my Form 4 against your director was submitted at the beginning of March.

 

Please understand that this is a place for consumers - not solicitors

 

I understand that if ze Director loses his certification you may not be able to operate in the market place and may lose significant contracts. That would be super!!!

 

Regards

 

Hazza

Edited March 31, 2009 by hazza

[hazza]

For anyone who is interested, as an update, I sent a Form 4 (after 360 days!) to Northampton Court. 14 days have just elapsed and I asked the court why I had not received a response.

I have been told that Newlyn's slimey solicitor's asked for an extension until mid April so that they could investigate the Consumer Action Group's forums and posts. Can anyone help advise what they are up to, if this topic is somewhat illegal in anyway and what the outcomes of the form 4 could be?

[JonCris]

Even though a members forum Newlyn & their mates do understand the law of copyright don't they? Also can't imagine what good they think investigating CAG will do.

 

IMHO they could be opening a can of worms for themselves in that the court may allow members to produce 'evidence' from the site to counter any argument Newlyn produce.................... & if I'm not mistaken any & all alleged misdemeanour's past or present have been exposed on this site & could/would be used against them

Edited March 30, 2009 by JonCris

[hazza]

Dear Harrow Observer,

 

This is the post that you should investigate.

 

I, along with many others, especially CAG users look forward to your story

 

Many thanks,

 

hazza

[hazza]

I've drafted another Form 4 against them for perverting the cause of justice - a feeble attempt by the bailiff to waste the court's time? It's been over a blinkin year, and i dunno how they'll try and get out of the failure to respond to two SAR's!!!

 

Seeing that CAG is a private / members-only website for consumers, they would look quite stupid if all they could muster up was a request to look at a members-only website - I suppose it's the solicitor's pulling the fast one on the bailiff - i bet the stupid bailiff has authorised the solictior to sit still and plough through 1000's of forum posts - at £250 per hour - clever clever solicitor!

[noomill060]

Why havent you enforced your SAR?

[hazza]

I was in direct contact with the leader of the council, who promised he would investigate personally - even left me an apologetic voice mail

He obviously has no power and heas been shut up.

I'm waiting to see if the Form4 complaint will resolve issues - but that has been delayed.

After the form 4 result i will write to the LGO and the DP people - should i not wait and just attempt to enforce?

Thanks

hazza

[hazza]

I also won an IPCC appeal against the police officers but nothing else... what can i do - sue the police?

[hazza]

I also wrote to the court in complaint as a member of the public when I heard that the bailiff impersonator wanted to become a certificated bailiff in June/July08- not sure if he ever did, but not at that court, and HMCS has no record of a certificate being given

[chris600uk]

I also won an IPCC appeal against the police officers but nothing else... what can i do - sue the police?

 

Yes you can, but in my opinion you should only do that if you can employ a specialist solicitor, someone like Chris Topping, who has the experience to tell you whether you have a chance of winning or not. I don't normally recommend people openly, because I risk having the post deleted, but if you are anywhere in the north-west that is the guy to use. You can't just use anyone, and it would be a mistake to try to do it yourself. Find someone has been recommended and talk to them, you have nothing to lose.

[JonCris]

I agree Chris Topping is an excellent choice.............. also I understand he gets really peed off when officialdom oversteps it's authority

[JonCris]

I agree Chris Topping is an excellent choice............also you don't have to live in the NW to engage him

 

He practices at Jackson Canter Solicitors, Liverpool

Edited March 30, 2009 by JonCris