Jump to content


Cheque Guarantee cards


spoutuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

thanks for that, what about using your card when you have no money in the account. I used my guantee card with a cheque and they charged me £35 and heres another one: i put £5 petrol in my car knowing at the time i had £5 in there took two weeks to come out so it cost me £35 agin for using my card is it better to ring then write as I prefer to write then I can keep copies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Penalty charges are penalty charges. If they are excessive then they are unlawful.

On the other hand, at some pint someone might decide that by clearly spending money fom an empty account that you are being dishonest about it which could lead to something a bit serious.

 

You need to realise that if you are going to take on the bank then you need to be vey careful about your own behaviour.

 

lets face it, we should all try to run our affairs correctly - buit the banks should try to run their's correctly as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better to ring and then confirm in writing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on! I don't agree with your last point Bankfodder. How can you spend money from an empty account without the bank's cooperation? I think it's safe to say that no money leaves the bank under any circumstances without the bank's permission (except maybe during an armed robbery). They can hardly say it was 'unauthorised' if they released the money. Nobody is forcing them to let you go over your overdraft, it can only happen with their permission.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on! I don't agree with your last point Bankfodder. How can you spend money from an empty account without the bank's cooperation?

 

When a cheque is drawn in payment of a bill and that cheque is backed by a cheque guarantee card, then the Bank is bound to pay regardless of the lack of funds n the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but bound by whom? I'm not certain, but I reckon if you check the small print it will say somewhere that the guarantee part is actually discretionary. It's difficult to imagine the banks allowing themselves to get into a situation where they are compelled to pay something, regardless of how much is in the account - especially since it's their contract you're signing in the first place.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm, very interesting. I stand corrected! I suppose there would not be much point in calling it a cheque guarantee card if it was not properly guaranteed. What happens if the bank writes to you and cancels your card - would they still honour a cheque written with it?

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect that it would be honoured. I expect that the bank would consider it to be very important to its reputation to be seen to be honouring the scheme. Further more I expect that it would be considered to be encumbent upon the bank to esnsure that its instruction no longer to use the card was obeyed. To do otherwise would be to discredit the scheme and would undermine business confidence.

However I expect that the brown stuff would be all over the place and that there would be a chance of the police being called in which might, as I suggested in my earlier post "lead to something a bit more serious".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A lot of banks do 'try it on' with regards to the cheque guarantee scheme. Quite often banks will bounce cheques even though they are guaranteed; only paying the cheque when the payee theatens action of one sort or another!

 

Using a cheque card knowing funds are not available is a criminal offence; obtaining a pecuinary advantage by deception. There can also be offences contrary to the Theft Act 1978 (evading a liability etc). Main case law on the subject is Metropolitan Police Commissioner v Charles (1977). That being said there is usually more chance of hell freezing over than any criminal proceedings ever being taken as a result of such use of a cheque card.

Link to post
Share on other sites

need to show dishonesty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe technically yes. You did not have funds sufficient to cover the cheque when you issued it. In the US is called 'kiting a cheque' and is a criminal offence.

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But..... Are we not all in this situation because of charges? So if the Bank had not taken all out moneyt there would be funds available?

 

Mal

Lloyds, DPA Letter issued 9/3/06

Lloyds, Preliminary approach letter issued 11/4/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/05/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...