Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sharpman V HFC


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Peeps

 

Sent a CCA request to HFC on 28Jan 2008, Signed for 29th Jan 2008.

Recieved today (05 Feb) a photocopy of loan agreement, no terms and conditions.

Along with a print out of the account and a settlment figure sheet.

 

My question is this. Does the CCA have to be the original because this looks like a photcopy of a faxed sheet. (at the bottom of the sheet is a line saying 'HFC Bank copy page 1 of ? (can't make out the other number as its blocked out by photo copy line)

Information on the CCA is refering to conditions overleaf, But there is no overleaf as they have not provided it.

Also do they have to provide t&c as was in force at the time of the cca.

 

Thanks

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peeps

 

Sent a CCA request to HFC on 28Jan 2008, Signed for 29th Jan 2008.

Recieved today (05 Feb) a photocopy of loan agreement, no terms and conditions.

Along with a print out of the account and a settlment figure sheet.

 

My question is this. Does the CCA have to be the original because this looks like a photcopy of a faxed sheet. (at the bottom of the sheet is a line saying 'HFC Bank copy page 1 of ? (can't make out the other number as its blocked out by photo copy line)

Information on the CCA is refering to conditions overleaf, But there is no overleaf as they have not provided it.

Also do they have to provide t&c as was in force at the time of the cca.

 

Thanks

 

Hello Sharpman,

 

It would be great if the creditors sent us the original agreement, we could hide them.

 

Now there is a lot of discussion relating to what should actually be sent to you. There is the mammoth thread on this I will find the link to it, but it probably will take you a week or more to read.

 

Consumer Credit Act Agreements

 

Maybe this one as well, if your brain is not mashed

 

Guidelines - Requests For An Original Agreement Under The Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

My own view/opinion is that they should send you under section 77/78 of the CCA 1974, a copy of the true agreement, with the terms and condition applicable to the time of the loan/cc and a statement of the account to date.

 

The creditors will argue that they can send a copy of a credit agreement with all of the relevant information and can omit signatures.:o

 

If the case ever went to court, they would have to produce the original ca there.

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

 

After getting the CCA's I've now sent them a statement of means with a list of creditors etc and offer of pro rata payment.

 

I then get a letter back with the following content :

 

Account No ........

Thank you for your recent communication. In order to assess your ability, we require the following additional Information:

 

proof of household income, payslips etc......benefits ...

proof of secured loans

proof of hp - copy of agreement etc.

 

-----------------------------

 

They've asked for this info within 7 days of reciept of letter.

Once they have this info they will asses me for pro rata payments.

 

-------------------

 

I've already sent them a copy of I&E sheet with list of creditors etc on. and the pro rata schedule.

 

Are they being obstructive in their request. I begrudge sending them more information than i have to.

 

The I&E sheet that was sent was a result of a consultation with the CCCS, so the figures are pretty much accurate.

 

Any input appreciated.

 

Sharpman.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

you really need to scan this "Agreement" up on here for us to look at properly. If you register with Photobucket (free), this is fairly straightforward... but any probs. just shout.

 

How old is this loan... and is it a "loan" or a credit card ? When was it taken out ?

 

Don't forward them with any personal docs.:eek: and be very cagey about what you write back :cool: . HFC want to know if you own property and/or if you're working. Scan up the "Agreement first and we will take it from there.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you really need to scan this "Agreement" up on here for us to look at properly. If you register with Photobucket (free), this is fairly straightforward... but any probs. just shout.

 

How old is this loan... and is it a "loan" or a credit card ? When was it taken out ?

 

Don't forward them with any personal docs.:eek: and be very cagey about what you write back :cool: . HFC want to know if you own property and/or if you're working. Scan up the "Agreement first and we will take it from there.

 

:)

 

Hi,

 

Copy of agreement as suggested.

There was only one sheet sent, but from what I can see from the bit at the bottom, it's 1 of possibly 3 pages.

 

hfcagreementmk4.th.jpg

I'm not disputing that it's not signed as it clearly is, but they don't appear to have supplied the full agreement, as, in parts it refers to items on another sheet.

 

as i've said from a prvious post I've already sent them an I&E statement, so they are aware of secured debts etc.

 

Sharpman

Edited by SharpmanTF1
Updated image for agreement

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

My own view/opinion is that they should send you under section 77/78 of the CCA 1974, a copy of the true agreement, with the terms and condition applicable to the time of the loan/cc and a statement of the account to date.

 

The creditors will argue that they can send a copy of a credit agreement with all of the relevant information and can omit signatures.:shock:

 

If the case ever went to court, they would have to produce the original ca there.

 

During 1985/1986 a major finance company I worked for put all their agreements on microfilm and destroyed the originals. This has been suprceded by electronic imaging. with the possible exception of large loans and mortgages, there are no originals.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

need somebody who is a financial wiz to take a peek at the following pdf.

 

HFC Statements queryedited .pdf

 

it contains amongst other things a CCA agreement. I need to know if its a good 'n (no t&cs came with this sheet.

 

My real question is relating to the statements.

 

Now, my contractual payment was £xx.xx I paid over and above the contractual payment.

 

in one statement they have the actual sum I paid with the running total.

in the other statement they've split the sum recieved in varying ways the split is not always the same. My question is, doing it that way has it disadvantaged me in any way. Hope that makes sense.

 

A DD question - when a DD is setup the reference number should theoreticaly be the ref of the account number its paying towards? this does not.

 

 

 

Sharpman

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sharpman,

 

On the face of it, this does look like an enforceable Agreement, but it's worth posting a query on the long CCA thread to have it checked out on there as well. I'll post a link in a minute.

 

Failing that, I'd go about re-claiming any unlawful charges on this one, whilst maintaining token payments.

 

Link is here...

 

Consumer Credit Act Agreements

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...