Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit Statutory Demand Recieved


MrSooty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Apologies for possible duplication, but this relates to 1st Credit, who have sent me a Statutory Demand (SD) today!

 

I had CCA'd them several weeks ago over an alleged debt with MBNA and also used the telephone harassment letter to stop them calling home regularly - it worked!

 

However, they have now issued the SD with no Court details - you have to phone an 0870 number to get that information - cute huh?!

 

Saw some posts from Rory, who has helped previously, so any help on this would be appreciated...

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have moved your post to it's own thread. Is the SD for more than 750 pounds? What type of credit is the account e.g. a loan or credit card? Have you ever received a default notice on the account? Have you ever received a Notice of Assignment from MBNA assigning the account to 1st Credit? Did you receive a Letter Before Action?

However, they have now issued the SD with no Court details - you have to phone an 0870 number to get that information
You don't need to phone them - in fact you shouldn't.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an abuse of process to send a SD after you have requested a CCA which by your sending indicates the debt is disputed.

 

I should write back & tell them this pointing out that unless they confirm within 48 hours that they do not intend to petition the court you will have no choice but to issue proceedings forthwith for none compliance with your CCA whilst at the same time drawing their conduct to the attention of the court & requesting costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, thanks to Rory for moving the post.

 

The history here, is that this is an MBNA Credit card that has around £8k on it and was defaulted about 4 years ago. Payments were made for the last 3 years of so at £80 per month until I dicsovered CAG....since then, it's been subject to a CCA request, which resulted in a heavily edited extract of an Credit Application form with a signature, which they (1st Credit) asked me to 'verify' or provide a copyof my own signature..

 

I responded to this (Nov 07) by sending a letter to say the CCA does not require me to provide proof of signature and quoting the Data Protection act etc..

 

Then on 23rd January, I recieved a letter from the 'Audit Team' at 1st Credit talking about the possibility of issuing a SD - followed 7 days later by the SD itself!

 

I do keep records of all correspondence and do NOT telephone these people and there is no indication of me ever having received a notice of assignment from MBNA...

 

If you need any more information, please ask - thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SD is almost identical to the one you have posted a link to....

 

In terms of getting it 'set aside' - what do I need to do and where does that leave me - in my view, they have yet to fully meet my CCA request, so are they even allowed to take this action if by my CCA request, the debt is obviously in dispute!??

Link to post
Share on other sites

It arrived via normal mail - but not sure if it was first or second class...

 

The accompanying letter also says -"we regret that you have chosen not to contact us following the recent letter from LCS Solicitors" - news to me, I have NOT had such a letter!!

The last correspondence I received was from the 1st Credit Audit team, dated 23rd Jan 2008 and the SD was dated 30 Jan 2008 - so somebody is clearly in a hurry!!

I presume I need to write back to them, but saying what....???

Thanks to all so far..

Link to post
Share on other sites

These (edit) are using a statutory demand as a threat, best grounds for set aside is probably that the amount stated is wrong. This is what i found on google I'm sure there will be more advice to follow

 

Cas

 

 

 

The procedure to get a statutory demand set aside.

 

After the period of 21 day from the statutory demand being served the person issuing the statutory demand may begin the process that petitions the person’s bankruptcy.

One method of avoiding bankruptcy is to get the statutory demand set aside.

To successfully get a statutory demand set aside one or more of the following must be satisfied:-

  • The amount stated on the statutory demand is disputed.
  • The person issuing the statutory demand also owes money. This is called a counterclaim.
  • The person issuing the statutory demand is holding security that equals or exceeds the amount owing.
  • The demand was issued in error.
  • The amount owing is less than £750
  • Execution has been stayed on a judgement debt.
  • The debtor is complying with an instalment order. This would mean the debt is not actually owed as it is being paid back.
  • The creditor failed to comply with the rules and prejudiced the debtor in the process.

back to top

What are the time limits to get a statutory demand set aside?

 

An application to set aside must be made with 18 days of the statutory demand being served.

 

What forms must be used to get a statutory demand set aside?

 

Forms 6.4 (application) and 6.5 (affidavit) must be completed and taken to the court.

 

Can the court dismiss an application to set a statutory demand set aside?

 

Yes, if application if there are no reasonable ground to do so.

 

What forms are typically used in the statutory demand process?

  1. Form no: 4.1
    Statutory Demand under section 123(1)(a) or 222(1)(a) of the Insolvency Act 1986
    Download Form 4.1.pdf*
  2. Form no: 6.1
    Statutory Demand under section 268(1)(a) of the Insolvency Act 1986. Debt for Liquidated Sum Payable Immediately
    Download Form 6.1.pdf*
  3. Form no: 6.2
    Statutory Demand under section 268(1)(a) of the Insolvency Act 1986. Debt for Liquidated Sum Payable Immediately Following a Judgment or Order of the Court
    Download Form 6.2.pdf*

Setting Aside Statutory Demand

If a debtor wishes to set aside a Statutory Demand then he has to make an application to the Court (there is no fee payable). The application must be supported by an Affidavit which sets out the reasons why the debt is disputed.

The grounds of setting aside the Statutory Demand have to be legitimate. If they are not, then the Court may dismiss the application without a hearing.

If the Court does allocate a hearing, both parties will be required to attend the Court and explain to a District Judge why the application should be set aside or otherwise.

 

Although SD must be taken seriously at all times don't get upset there are a lot of people who will help you here.

 

Set aside forms are here

 

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/forms/6-4.pdf

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/forms/6-5.pdf

 

 

Which form did they send you?

 

If the debtor disputes the claim, he or she can apply for the statutory demand to be set aside.

 

The bankruptcy court will halt the bankruptcy if there is any dispute about the sum outstanding.

 

It can be relatively easy for a debtor to have a statutory demand set aside and the process can result in an order for costs being made against the creditor, so caution needs to be exercised before using a Statutory Demand.

 

In addition to the CCA I would send the following letter by registered post (Special Delivery if you can afford it) ASAP.

 

Remember keep copies of all you send and all post recipts etc.

 

The letter is one of Curlybens edit out the irrelavent bits to do with the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

 

 

 

 

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES.

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I have received the Court claim filed by your Company. To enable me to file a defence and counter-claim, I require specific information regarding the account to be provided forthwith. Given that this matter is now the subject of legal proceedings, you are obliged to disclose under the Civil Procedure Rules, the information and documents detailed below. This letter supersedes the Data Protection request made to on the **DATE**. The information must be furnished by the **DATE**, which gives you ten days to provide what has been requested. If you fail to comply, this will be reported to the Court, a copy of this letter will be provided as evidence to the same and an Order enforcing your compliance will be sought.

 

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

a. A transcript of all transactions, including charges, fees, interest, repayments and payments and both the original amount of the loan and any repayments made to it the account.

b. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations

c. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with **CREDITOR**.

d. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

e. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

f. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

g. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

h. A genuine copy of any deed of assignment, or proof that you have a legal right to this money.

i. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

j. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

 

3. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

4. A copy of your complaints procedure, as required by the Consumer Credit Act 2006.

5. Clarification of the date you acquired the debt, what organisation you acquired it from, their registered office, their company number (if any) and what legal title they had to this debt, and what credit license number they had at the time that the debt was purchased or entered into.

 

I will require this information within the next ten days. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, it will be reported to the Court that you are trying to frustrate proceedings and denying me the opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

Yours Faithfully,

user_online.gifreputation.gif vbrep_register("1352624") report.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CAS - what a lot of relevant information!

 

Thanks also to Curlyben for a brilliant draft letter - which I think I will be using very soon ;)

 

The only further question I have at this time is relating to the Court - which Court - they don't mention one, so how do I get to forms 6.4 or 6.5 to a Court.....should 1st credit be telling me as they suggest I telephone them ....NOT!!

 

Great response - much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone your local County Court and ask if they deal with SD set aside they are usually very kind and helpful.

 

It is just a matter of swearing an affadavit if you can post it up or tell us what their claim is suggestions as to the reasons for set aside will be posted.

 

Do Not Phone

 

Prepare to make an official complaint to them then the OFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will see if I can get a copy of their SD scanned and posted here tomorrow, together with the 'edited copy' of their response to my CCA request, which is truly pathetic!!

 

Given that they have never provided me with a copy which includes prescribed terms, surely, they are not permitted to move to this stage in law...?

 

If this IS the case, then this SD stuff must be a 'bluff' and the draft letter you posted will flush out the real position - see if they do have a hand to play!?:rolleyes:

 

Plus they have lied about a Solicitors letter...!

 

Would someone mind posting the link to templates for either a suitable complaint letter and one to the OFT - assuming someone has been here before:-)

 

Cheers

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks again CAS!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Given that they have never provided me with a copy which includes prescribed terms, surely, they are not permitted to move to this stage in law...?"

 

These people are paid peanuts and aren't the sharpest knives in the box.

 

"If this IS the case, then this SD stuff must be a 'bluff' and the draft letter you posted will flush out the real position - see if they do have a hand to play!?:rolleyes:"

 

SD cost a stamp to send out and a visit to your local court to set aside, I would not second guess these people and dealing with it sends a message that you know what you are doing.

 

They will ignore the letter, they will tell you to forget the SD if you phone and then they will/may petition for bankruptcy without telling you.

 

It is easier just to get it set aside within the 18 days.

 

"Plus they have lied about a Solicitors letter...!"

 

They've lied to you once, they will lie in court allegedly.

 

I will dig around for a suitable letter when you have posted the SD

 

All the best

 

Cas

Link to post
Share on other sites

The accompanying letter also says -"we regret that you have chosen not to contact us following the recent letter from LCS Solicitors" - news to me, I have NOT had such a letter!!

 

Well fancy that, I had exactly the same letter as well and in my case after they entered default on a CCA request.

My normal response to a SD served this way is to ignore it but since these clowns have ignored my request and letters saying they are in default, I actually intend to have this one set aside if it means i get to sit in front of Judge and explain how they are in default, have ignored requests, claimed to have sent letters when they have not done so etc etc..the list goes on.

I want to impress upon the Court that 1st credit are Vexatious Litigants and this seems to be the only way i can maybe get through to them.

 

Any pointers on what to put in the set aside forms to convey this message, just imagine if a whole bunch of Caggers who have been on the receiving end of these liars and cheats , manage to sing from the same hymn sheet and fire a great big shot across thier bows.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any pointers on what to put in the set aside forms to convey this message, just imagine if a whole bunch of Caggers who have been on the receiving end of these liars and cheats , manage to sing from the same hymn sheet and fire a great big shot across thier bows.

Well said Betaflat.

We had 'dealings' with them too. All the posts I read on here show what these people are - yet somehow their Director is elected President of the CSA!!

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that a CPR request wasn't available due to the regulations pertaining to stat demands are covered under the insolvency laws ? whereas CCJ's / charging orders are covered under the CPR request for information ? I may be wrong (or it might be worth a try)..!! I would ring your local court and make them aware what 1st Credit are doing also.....they use these stat demands too lightly, but it gives them leverage to go for Bankruptcy so make sure you cover your back just in case, as said above it really is an abuse of process too....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although the CPR request would not be directly relevant to an SD or Insolvency, the documents refered to in it are relevant and useful.

 

They can be quoted as being requested and not supplied as a reason for the SD to be set aside.

 

Some of the companies will write back asking for £10 for the information and treat it like an SAR.

 

If a CCA request had not already been made I would advise that an official request was made at this time making sure that the £1 fee was sent.

 

Never trust them and always cover yourself when you recieve an SD

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

SD document and original CCA response scanned and attached....

 

Date of my original CCA request (signed for proof of delivery) was 28th August 2007 and their response (prescribed terms, what prescribed terms!!??) was dated 25th October 2007 - 2+12+30 =?????? not 58 for sure!!

 

Having checked my growing 1st Credit file, I was advised by MBNA that they had sold the alleged debt to 1st Credit at the end of 2004...

 

Telephone call to local court on Monday, letter to 1st Credit as per CAS/Curlyben by signed for delivery - anything else at this time....?

 

Many thanks!

1stCredit_25Oct07.pdf

1stCredit_30Jan08.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter is exactly the same, word for word as the one I received and like you, no letter had been sent to my by their in house Solicitors.

Unlike you though, although 1st Credit have acknowledged receipt of my CCA request, nothing has been forthcoming apart from further letters attempting to extract money by various means.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked through some similar posts involving 1st Credit and noted a very interesting point made by a very well respected CAG member, Curlyben, who sayswith regard to sending a CCA request -

" After 12 WORKING days the "debt" is in default and stays that way until the request is complied with.

If a FURTHER month passes then the DCA has committed a summary criminal offence and the matter should be referred to Trading Standards for action."

 

Well, I am in that position, as I sent my CCA to First Credit on 28th August and they sent me some rubbish documentation in response on 25th Oct - outside the time limit and therefore they have committed 'a summary criminal offence'....

 

Perhaps the art of dealing with an SD here is NOT to acknowledge it, but to counter strike against them - risky business or not?

 

Maybe a call to my local Trading Standards office would be a good start...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...