Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice Required


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

My wife works as a hairdresser in the north east,3 weeks ago an elderly lady came in and lost her glasses in the shop, the boss of the shop basically did nothing but phone around a few customers,the lady later asked if (a)she had insurance to cover the loss or(b)whether she would be willing to pay half (£275) that they cost.The owner did nothing saying it was not her fault and she was not liable.The elderly lady refused to return to the shop on principal but as it was coming up to xmas she asked my wife if she could come and do her hair at home,after much hummimg and harring my wife agreed to do it as a favour xmas and all that,now my wife's boss has found out about this,she asked my wife about it who told her the thruth that yes she had done it,now she is threating to sack her saying that it is un-professional.Can she do this the lady was not coming back and it was only a favour??? Any ideas any-one

 

Cheers nafjor

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is a (properly worded) clause in her contract of employment that prohibits conflicts of interest/other work, then yes they can.

 

Otherwise no.

 

How long has your wife been working here, and does she even have a contract?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,Thanks for getting back she has no contract and she has worked there for about 3 to 4 yrs,so it would seem the boss has no leg to stand on really.

 

Cheers nafjor

 

Quite right! Your wife could probably resolve this informally, by pointing out that she has no contract (hence no clause prohibiting anything) and dropping hints that she'll go to tribunal....

 

If she does get dismissed, then people on here will help you with a claim for unfair dismissal etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello again,

My wife has been offered a new job which she is going to take,is it ok to only give one weeks notice as she gets paid weekly,and is she entitled to the remainder of her holidays back in cash when she leaves,she currently works 19hrs a week and her holidays run April to April.Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

is it ok to only give one weeks notice as she gets paid weekly,

 

 

Yes.

 

 

Bare in mind that she is not entitled to her full years holiday. say for example she gets 26 days annual leave from April to April. You must take the 26 days and divide this by 12 (this gives you the number of days you are entitled to per month) then multiply this by 10 (the 10 months she has worked) and this will give you your total.

 

 

eg 26 Divided by 12 = 2.16 x 10 = 21.5 days annual leave due.

 

 

I think, someone may correct me.

 

 

Hope that helps.

 

 

Regards.

 

 

Scott.

 

 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, assuming your wife leaves her job week ending 8th Feb - her holiday entitlement for the year starting 1st April 07 till 8th Feb 08 would be 70.6 hours (based on working 19 hours per week). You have to deduct any holidays she has already taken from 1st April till now and that will give you what she should be paid on leaving.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,Does anyone know of a link(template) to write a letter of notice as my wife is moving on the pastures new at work and needs to hand her notice in tomorrow(TUESDAY),can she request payment of any holidays not taken due to her.Thanks nafjor

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't find a pre-prepared template which looks OK, so how about:-

 

Dear (Sir, Madam or Name),

 

After much consideration, I have made the difficult decision to leave (Company Name), and have accepted a position with another company. In accordance with my Terms of Employment, I hereby tender my resignation with one week's notice, and my last working day with (Company Name) will therefore be (Date).

 

I understand that my final pay will be made up to include the (No of days/weeks) holiday entitlement which I have not taken, and my wageslip and P45 will be forwarded to me in a timely fashion.

 

I would like to thank you for employing me and wish you well for the future.

 

Yours (Sincerely or Faithfully)

 

 

Naturally you may need to edit the above to suit.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

I need some help,it appears that there is a chance my wifes employer (who she is leaving next week)has not being paying her N.I ,is the employer responisble for the short fall if there is one.If this helps my wife recieves £110.20 per week.

Cheers nafjor

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, by my reckoning your wife should have been paying £1.10 per week and her employer approx £1.28 - but you need to check ( the threshold for earnings 2007 was £87). You should contact HRMC to find out if contributions have been made.

 

Hope this is helpful

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...