Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Direct Collections


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have an on going dispute with my previous landlords for outstanding rent on a property we lived in for over 2 years. The amount is around about £2600 but the landlord is trying to add monthly interest that has seen this rise to over £4000 (this is since June last year). At the same time the lanlord has essentially stiffed us out of £1700 deposit which they are retaining due to damage to the property (not true) and costs to replace a lawn killed by the drought (despite informing them at the time the lawn was being killed due to the hosepipe ban). In fact we spent over 500 on the garden and £600 on the house during our time there.

 

Initially the landlord handed this to his solicitor who I dealt with. Everything went quiet for some time - next thing I know I get a letter from a XXXXXX from Direct Collections demanding full payment. I contacted the soliciter who had no knowledge of this company - he mentioned that it looked like the landlord had decided to use a debt collector.

 

On speaking to XXXXX I acknolowledged that we owed the landlord some money but were in dispute about how much. He asked us for a bona fide payment and I agreed to pay £1000 towards the account on the understanding that we would not pay anymore until the amount was agreed. I was then told by a solicitor not to pay them anything until the amount had been agreed. Direct collections have got aggressive with frequent phone messages and on one occassion a heavy turning up on the door and demanding money from my wife (holding our 1 year old at the time) This is compunded by me living away from home during the week.

 

I am concerned that the door stop visits stop -

 

I am happy to come to an agreement but am not going to pay the landlord anythng until we have agreed on a final figure and breakdown.

 

Any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scooters, i am bumping this for you as i am sure how to advise.

 

I did wonder though if you signed a contract with the landlord? Has he broken down the amount he is charging and specified what each charge is in turn? I am wondering what legal right a debt collection company has to chase you for this? They do not have the right to harrass you or your family regardless of how much you owe.

 

I would advise that you keep all communication in writing. I would be wary of accepting any verbal advice.

 

I am sure someone will be able to offer more specific help.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a letter i've used (taken from this site!) re doorstep intruders!

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Please be advised that I am only prepared to communicate with you in writing. OFT rules and regulations clearly state that you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you. There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives, to visit me at my property and if you persist in sending “doorstep callers” to my home, you will be reported for harassment and be liable for damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be liable for conspiring in a tort of trespass by acting in defiance of my instructions and sending someone to visit me nevertheless.

 

Should it be necessary, I will obtain an injunction.

 

Yours sincerely

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks folks,

 

Yes, we did have a formal contract with the landlords and it is binding. However, they have mis understood the application of interest. I deliberately sat on the last month's rent because I suspected we may have issues over the deposit. The landlords are private individuals who had this as a buy to let property - everything was fine until April last year when they decided that they wanted to sell. We were told to be out by the end of June - we left on the 17th June and the landlord is trying to claw back May and the whole of June. They have also witheld all but £120 of the deposit - they have detailed each item on the inventory - charging us £5 for a light bulb and over £500 for cleansing (despite us having the place professionally cleansed). Thing is that they didn't sell the place until last month so it has sat empty for months - they have obviously been in fiscal straights and it is interesting how the amount clawed back from the deposit equates to 2 morgtage payments for them exactly.

 

Now I know this isn't a forum for tennancy disputes but they have now got this mob from Direct Collections involved and I'm feeling pretty vunerable as far as I am concerned the amount is in dispute. Were this a credit card debt then it would be pretty clear. As it is it looks like they are trying to recover their money (and I am wiling to pay some of what they ask) using a DCA - I would have thought it would have been easier and cheaper for them to sue us and I would prefer that because at least a 3rd party could adjudicate. Instead, I feel like I am being threatened and bullied and do not see how I can defend mself against them.

 

Thaks for the letter Hopeful1 - I live in Scotland -would this work in Scotland? The property in question, the DCA and the landlords are all based in England - as common Law doesn't apply north of the border is there a letter I need to use to protect myself - I know that aspects of Scots law can protect you from such behaviour.

 

Is there any way I can force the landlords to sue rather than choose the route they have?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scooters, i wouldn't try to advise you on this situation as i am not knowledgeable enough. See what you responses you get during the day from the others. If the right advice isn't forthcoming, we can PM your link to a site helper or mod for further advice.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thaks for the letter Hopeful1 - I live in Scotland -would this work in Scotland? The property in question, the DCA and the landlords are all based in England - as common Law doesn't apply north of the border is there a letter I need to use to protect myself - ?

The DCAs will not be aware that Common Law does not apply. Just remove the reference to ENGLISH and it will suffice. Our resident Scottish expert Rory will be along to give you the woridng you need to quote for Scotland, but if you send them hopefuls letter that will suffice in the meantime.

 

Should another heavy appear at your door I suggest your wife telephones the Polis and reports a breach of the peace or that she feels threatened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...