Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance Claim Hell


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5864 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, this is my first post to the forum, did everyone have a good Christmas?

 

A house fire in October 2007 completely destroyed our kitchen, causing heavy smoke damage to our lounge and dining room, we're very lucky to be alive and both being disabled were fortunate enough to have neighbours who literally carried us out of the house. Although insured by a firm called Cunningham & Lindsey, their brochures are in the Nat West bank, we thought our nightmare was over, what fools we were!!

 

We were finally allowed back in our home 3 weeks later and an assessor from Cunningham & Lindsey declared everything would be replaced, including smoke damaged furniture etc, and professionally cleaned otherwise. My mother, a disabled pensioner, has had to contact C & L on a daily basis for 2 months, they have lost quotes so ask for others, they say they'll do one thing but do another, then they give my mother the run-around. To date we have received a replacement cooker, fridge-freezer and washing machine and various things were collected for cleaning. But now they say they can do nothing more. The original assessor's assessment of what needed replacing has been torn up and my mother is expected to be thankful for a £800 cheque and some Argos vouchers, apparently the food in the fridge-freezer destroyed by fire is covered by the Argos vouchers.

 

She's bewildered and so am i!!.

 

Apart from the memories and items that cannot be replaced, she's expected to refurnish the downstairs of her home with only a partial payment from her insurers, nothing like the agreement she signed up for. She was told by Cunningham & Lindsey to replace a glass chandelier i bought, almost £400, with one from Woolworths....and to stop wittering as she didn't have long on this earth left anyway.

 

Three months after the fire we're still occupying only the upstairs of the house, downstairs being unliveable-in. I cannot believe that in the year 2007 an insurance company is allowing a disabled pensioner and disabled son to live like this. I've tried emailing C & L but they do not reply. I've phoned but they say they've never heard of us OR we're conveniently disconnected. I'm disabled myself, totally bed-ridden, i've tried to sort things out myself but are running out of ideas. Can anyone advise us please....we're pretty desperate now, we feel utterly alone and abandoned.

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

The financial ombudsman Service will deal with insurance claim problems and there is a telephone number on their website

 

Also I will do a quick check on the insurance company to see if they are members of any insurance affiliations. Why was the assessors report torn up?

 

first of all if it was an independant assesor I would contact them and ask for a copy urgently as this may be the basis for any claim.

 

Also dont ring the insurance company any more do it all in writing and set out all your concerns/ confusion and ask for a full explanation of the terms of the claim in writing ( so you can use it for any complaint against them)

 

 

jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit confused

 

cunningham and lindsey appear to be loss adjusters insurance managers rather than the actual insurers? do you still have a copy of your insurance policy? It should be clearer on their who the actual insurers are and which group they belong to.

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way dont feel abandoned - you will get lots of help here - we are particularly fond of writing letters demanding action!.

 

You may not have new for old cover - but you should at least be in a habitable position - in other words no worse of than you were before the fire.

 

Jan:)

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jansus you're a star!! I had little hope anybody would reply to my post because nobody wanted to know up until now. I read what you wrote and decided another big 'push' was needed before our insurance company walked all over us again.

 

I managed to get an appointment for my mother with her bank, the Nat West...who were still pushing this insurance company on to it's customers, and thank God i did, as far as the insurance company were concerned the claim was closed and we were happy. The bank manager did all the talking over the phone because the insurance company refused all contact with my mother, there were numerous apologies, a few promises but it was my pensioner mother's fault because she failed to contact them 3 times a day...( you want to see our phone bill, we should have had our insurance company on BT's Friends & Families option )....and as of today we're better informed and see some light at the end of the tunnel.

 

After some negotiation it seems our original cheque for only £800 to cover everything will be quadrupled, the Argos vouchers they admit were to shut my mother up but their total will be increased to reflect the cost of replacing kitchen equipment etc. And redecoration costs are now included including carpets and soft furnishings. My mother should receive what she was entitled to, not the miserly offer they thought she'd be happy with.

 

Still, the bank manager made the insurers promise they'd telephone my mother that afternoon to finalise things, we're still waiting for the call unfortunately. A proper apology from the company would have been nice but it would mean nothing now, not when you've been called all the names under the sun and treated as we have been.

 

So fingers crossed this stage is over now and maybe the memories of the house-fire can slowly disappear. But you inspired me Jansus and i thank you for that. Without you we'd have given up!!

 

Thanks for everything

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

so pleased you seem to be getting a result. keep pushing if you dont get confirmation in writing soon. Quite right that the bank should support you if they are promoting the company. unfortunately most insurance companies will try and keep payouts low (to increase profits) so you do have to push. If you dont get the monies soon use the bank support or come back on here. I would be pleased to help you with a letter of complaint .I am an ex insurance employee.

 

best wishes and hope your life is back to normal soon

 

jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, thankyou everyone for taking the time to post a reply. I've posted a couple of queries on the forums thanks to positive feed back regarding this problem. I've finally realised i have a voice and i shouldn't allow people to walk all over me!!

 

Jansus: We're going to be in contact with the Nat West, who were pushing this firm of insurers on their customers, as the cleaning company employed by them phoned to say our tv blew up, along with a hi fi, dvd & video player and Sky digi box- while they were being cleaned. I'm sure our insurers will be pleased to know those items will now need replacing...LOL

 

I can just imagine the look on their faces!!

 

And thankyou for the offer of a letter of complaint. If we get that far down the line, i'll take you up on the offer. But you've been so kind up to now i feel pretty indebted. I can only offer you our thanks.

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) No problem - I just hope everything gets sorted in the end - if not, here if you need me

 

jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm going through a lot worse with HSBC and my dispute is now going to Court as HSBC are not complying with the FOS adjudication.

 

However, as you have suffered a fire claim, you should be entitled to rent a property similar to yours whilst your place is being refurbised. The cost of rent etc. will be covered under the buildings policy.

 

Check this out and claim for what is rightfully yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

At last the nightmare is over!!

 

A settlement has been agreed and the cheque has arrived, but it's taken the best part of 6 months. Our bank manager finally sorted things out though Cunningham & Lindsey (our insurers) even had the nerve to lie to our bank manager several times, they weren't even ashamed of the lying and deceit saying it's part and parcel of the job.

 

Well if lying and deliberate deceit are now openly part of the insurance industry, and they're admitting to it, the consumer will always lose out.

 

A big thankyou to everyone who posted their thoughts....without your encouragement and insight we'd have been walked all over by our insurers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

 

I am so pleased for you a result at last. It just shows that perseverence and "the little man" can win through in the end.

 

Well done and hopefuly you can now pass on your wisdom to others.:grin:

 

 

Best wishes

 

Jan:)

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...