Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The postcode is an important point. You cannot be in two postcodes at the same time and the contract only covers the F area and not the E area where Met placed your car. See there is some   advantages in with idiots.🙂 The other fact about the electric spaces is that as you are not allowed to park there, the sign is prohibitory so cannot  offer a contract anyway. and another biggie in your favour is you were not the driver and the PCN does not comply with PoFA. I had another look yesterday at the PCN and there is another error since it does not say that the driver is responsible to pay the charge during the first 28 days. Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][b] (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; so that is another nail in their coffin and it s something I would include in  your WS since that is one that every Judge would accept as a failure to comply. As far as their WS is concerned some of them leave it to the last minute to prevent Defendants being able to counteract their claims. However if they leave it too late [ie after the stipulated time] you can email yours to the Court on the last day and complain at the bottom of your WS that you have not received it and therefore you are asking the Court not to accept their WS. In your case it isn't that important since you have a virtual walkover in Court. I would be surprised if they don't concede beforehand. It is a lost cause for them. Not that I would advocate parking in their electric bay in future with a petrol driven car again.🙂
    • I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version. I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version. I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version.
    • Thank you Dave for jumping in yesterday and advising not to send off the letter I wrote. I am sorry Clou but I thought at the time that both car parks were owned by Alliance. Before doing a snotty letter does anyone in your family able to alos drive your car apart from yourself and are you the keeper?
    • Thanks for this. UPS never said they delivered to the wrong address. Tracking just showed as delivered. EBay couldn’t find it for weeks and then said they found it and it had chocolate in it. Something clearly doesn’t add up here.
    • Try to think things through logically & legally - the two go together as the civil court system in England is pretty decent and easy to get your head round. 1.  Say you & I got into legal dispute.  Who could sue who?  Well I could sue you and you could sue me.  My next-door neighbour couldn't sue you and your best mate couldn't sue me because the case would have nowt to do with them.  The same goes for a DCA.  It's not their debt.  They can do nothing. 2.  Of course a DCA can't affect your credit score.  If they could, then there would be nothing stopping you picking on someone you dislike, saying they owed you a billion pounds, and affecting their credit score.  Logically there must be more to it than some daft allegation.  CCJs are issued and credit scores wrecked after a judge has decided on the matter and the losing party has still refused to pay.  With nine grand in play the matter will not magically go away but you need to gen up and seperate daft threats from paper tigers from concrete threats which could really cause you trouble. The others are right - you need to inform the original creditor of your address in order to avoid a backdoor CCJ. Also, why did you decide not to sue UPS who have admitted to delivering to the wrong address which in turn led to the theft of your goods?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescott and Moorcroft


reduk054
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5974 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, wonder if anyone can assist me with some potent letters to the above DCAs please?

My best friend had a store card, which was passed to Moorcroft in the summer. My friend negotiated a full and final settlement (over the phone, opps nothing in writing, I think that you can tell where this one is going!!), which was paid.

Last week, Wescott have requested an immediate settlement of the outstanding debt, i.e. the difference between the full amount and the full and final settlement.

Moorcroft did not update the records to the store involved and Wescott have been advised by the OC to collect the remainder. Have threatened the baillifs in their first letter.

So please can any one assist me or more importantly my friend, with two letters, one to Moorcroft and one to Westcott!

Thank you all!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not ask Moorcroft to confirm in writing that the F&F was agreed and paid (the worst thing that can happen is that they won't, but if you don't ask then they certainly won't) and send of the CCA request to Wescot to at least buy some time. You never know as it's a store card they may not have an agreement and even if they do it could be unenforceable.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all, thank you very much for the quick repsonses.

There has been nothing in writing from Moorcroft to my friend or to the store involved from Moorcroft, my friend has verbally requested that MC send a letter to the store.

Thanks Grumpy and Rory about the CCA request, I thought that this may be the way forward, but reallly wanted to fend Westcott off with a blinding letter to say that all monies paid (i know that without a letter as proof it is not so easy).

OK will mull it over today, and post when i have decided what to do to help her!!

thanks again. you are all so helpful!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Red, i would certainly follow Rory's advice and ask for confirmation of the full and final, stating you / your friend have a record of the payment made, but have not yet received confrimation from them. See what they come back with.

 

Geez, it never stops does it? :rolleyes:

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hopeful1, have been thinking about this all morning! My friends main concern is the bailiff threat, and because she is not a member on here, obviously this has stressed her no end, and regardless of what I say, she will still jump each time the door bell goes.

IMO it is Wescott who need dealing with asap. I have been debating whether to CCA or account in dispute? (and i have my fingers crossed that her dad has not got involved and phoned them in the meantime!).

So guys, which is better CCA request (to buy a little time) or account in dispute (also to buy time)?!

Thanks all!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

And with this verbal full and final settlement just proves the point

NEVER TRUST A DCA!

I wish that she had found this site before hand! But I like helping....spreading the good word of the CAG!!!!

Moorcroft were verbally asked at the time of payment to put it in writing, and again this summer. They have not done this. So I am

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re comment from Rory:

Moorcroft were verbally asked at the time of payment to put it in writing, and again this summer. They have not done this. So I am pondering a letter to them, with the dates of calls and F&F, asking them to send the settlement in writing to store and my mate and wescott in 7 days, or further action will be taken. I know that it is pushing it a little as there is nothing in writing so far, but if i put the request in writing for my friend and then send it recorded, along with copy of their complaints procedure......

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I would do Red. Verbal requests are not sufficient as they obviously don't act on them.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Rory TY, when I have drafted something I will post it up for comments, grammar checks, alterations of any kind! And in your opinion CCA or account in dispute (could always go for the first request followed by the second letter, just not sure on the time frames that Wescot are working to as have not been given any of the paperwork yet!)

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just go for the account in dispute first and see how they react. Sometimes Wescot are reasonably okay about these things and do actually read letters that are sent.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How is this letter everyone, this one is to Moorcroft who screwed up in the first place?

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Re: ********Account / reference number********

Full and Final Settlement

I write with reference to my payment in full and final settlement of the above account, which you were collecting on behalf of ******, as the original creditor. This full and final settlement was made on this account on the *****date****, using ****method of payment***, as agreed with Moorcroft Debt Receovery. This payment was made on the clear understanding that, once accepted, neither you nor any associate company would take any other action to enforce or pursue this debt in any way whatsoever and that I would be released for any liability.

I also requested that, once payment was made, that you, Moorcroft Debt Recovery would make an entry on a credit reference agency file relating to the above account as "satisfied" in full, and that you would advise the original creditor accordingly.

Although payment was made on ****date*****, I note with disappointment that you have not updated my credit reference file, nor have you contacted the original creditor advising them of the full and final settlement. Therefore I am still being chased for an outstanding amount, which I dispute vehemently.

What I require from you.

1) to update my credit file with the account noted as satisfied in full

2) advise the original creditor in writing that the debt was settled with you, in full on the ******

3) to write to me confirming that the account has been settled in full.

Failure to compy fully with my request within the next 14 days from the date of this letter will prompt me to take further action against you, which may include, but is not limited to; contacting the OFT and Trading Standards.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And comments please on this letter to Wescot.......thank you!

 

Account in dispute

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by me.

I would point out that we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to Wescot. I am familiar with the ‘Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance’ which states that it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using unfair methods.

Furthermore, disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to psychological harassment.

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above accounts unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

I await your written confirmation within 14 days that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

I look forward to your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Red. For what it's worth, it looks good to me.

 

How fantastic to be able to help a friend with all the experience and knowledge you have.

 

I'm sure they will be forever grateful ;)

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to add to the Wescot letter that the account was settled in full on such and such a date with Moorcroft.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ty Hopeful1, its so difficult when you see your best mate in floods of tears over some bully-boy DCA, and know what they are going through!

Thanks for the comments on the letters, they are mix and match from letters I have already sent!I just like the once over from CAG faithfuls just incase I have put something numpty-ish in by accident!

For my best mate its worth it, she is a damsel in distress! So although its one more thing in my never ending pile of things to do (just like you! LOL), its worth it! (thank you L'Oreal)

Hugs

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers everyone for your constant support. Its good to be amongst such fab people!

Red x

 

It's only what you deserve ;)

  • Haha 1

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just caught up with my friend this eve who has sent both of the letters, one to Moorcroft and one to Wescot. Unfortunately she just used a first class stamp :eek: as she was under the impression that you cannot send mail to a PO box recorded!?!

So I have suggested that she should see what happens in a week, and if nothing comes through, or more threatening letters, that we will go from there.

Red

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just caught up with my friend this eve who has sent both of the letters, one to Moorcroft and one to Wescot. Unfortunately she just used a first class stamp :eek: as she was under the impression that you cannot send mail to a PO box recorded!?!

So I have suggested that she should see what happens in a week, and if nothing comes through, or more threatening letters, that we will go from there.

Red

 

Oh knickers! :D

 

It will be interesting to see if they respond. Will you resend if they don't?

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopeful1, I will insist that she re-sends the letters if she hears nothing within the timeframes given, or if she receives anything involving further scare tactics! Absolutely!

I used to be under the (wrong) impression that a PO box would not receive a recorded letter, but thanks to CAG, I know that not to be the case. At least my friend feels more in control now. Sometimes though it is just a case of getting round to dealing with such letters, or a kick up the behind from your friends! LOL

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...