Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Won a small claim, now what?


Delta-NC
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Long story short, bought a laptop on ebay, was defective (FUBARly). Guy said it was "my problem" because I didn't take out insured shipping even though it was never offered and he charged me near twice what it would have cost. Which would have made no diffrence anyway because it is clear it was not damaged in the post despite being packed in only brown paper.

 

Anyway I took him to court in Scotland (he lives in England), he refused to acknowledge any correspondence bar one letter I sent initially. He avoided the court officer visiting by getting his other half to claim he does not and never has lived there. I know he does because I had called them a few times, whenever I got her he "wasn't in" and whenever I got him there where long pauses and then phrases like "he does not live at this address" instead of the commonly used "I think you have the wrong number" that most unguilty people say.

 

Anyway, because of him refusing the documents I won the case but they say his whereabouts where *address* but now "unknown".

 

Where can I go from here? Is there any way I can prove he lives there? Is there anything I can do to the address without necessarily "proving" he lives there? And would I be out of order publishing the full details of this case online? (His address, phone number included)

 

To be honest, I'd be quite content with making his life a living hell, and never see a penny back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

This is a bit heavyhanded & its what I would do.

 

He lives in England, then see if he is a homeowner. Visit HM Land Registry and get a copy of the title deeds to his known address. There is a charge of £3. If you have a Judgment then register a legal charge on his property. Download and complete Form CH1 and return it with a copy of your Judgment to Land Registry. You will accrue interest at 8% a year and get your money when he sells the property. If the charge is more than £750 you can ask for an Order of Sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tip. I've posted off an application since the online checked had no results.

 

The total debt now owed to me is just over £600. £535 for the item in question and £75 in legal fees.

 

Anything else I can try? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

Application for what? what online check produced no results? Did you mean he is not named on the land registry title of his known address?

 

You can issue a warrant addressed to the bailiff. They have greater power of determining if the judgment debtor is at the address. He can levy on his car or his goods.

 

The price of the goods is more than £100, did you pay by credit card? If yes, then hooray! You can do a simple chargeback under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and your bank will reclaim the money. Phone the bank & ask them to send you a chargeback form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called up the HM Land Registry and they couldn't find details of the property online, so they told me to fill out a form and mail it in.

 

I paid using debit card via PayPal who, it is now apparent, are a bunch of crooks as well. He knew how to play their systems and due to their idiotic company policy they refuse to reopen my dispute. That being as far as I can talk to them, they seem unable to hold a continued discussion from one call/email to another.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did paypal and ebay have to say on this matter, were there involved in this. If so, and you claimed through paypal, there should have refunded the money and there chase the seller for it afterwards. if the item was damaged then you should have opened a dispute with ebay and paypal, and it might not have taken court action, i'm not sure of the cirmcumstances, but the 1st port of call would have been paypal etc.

As 101 has said, the opition of using a bailiff might be the next port of call, did'nt you ask the courts to award compo for the item?

 

Food for thought, have you tryed to send a empty package addressed to him only, wheres he needs to sign and only him, to the address he lives at, then when he signs you will know he lives there, abit crafty but least you will know.

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

A lesson learned, always use a credit card when dealing with paypal and ebay. You can do a chargeback if it all goes wrong.

 

Speak with your bank, a chargeback is still possible but its down to goodwill of your bank. You might have to plead with them to reclaim your money, they will be debiting it from paypals merchant account and not from your defendant.

 

You can use an old debt collectors trick & get a positive ID on the derfandants address. Download Google Earth and enter his postcode, get an idea of where he lives. Visit the Royal Mail postcode locator and get an address near the defendant. Have a young woman phone him by his first name, pretend to be a neighbour having some erroneously delivered mail for him. Issue warrant addressed to the bailiff, lots of them to choose from, Drakes, JBW Enforcements to name a few.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is basically what happened with regards to PayPal. He was clever enough not to send me anything, for nearly three weeks, until I filed a non-received dispute with PayPal. Two days later the item was at my door. Only, company policy at PayPal says you can only file one dispute per transaction. Therefore they did not care less about the fact it was wrecked because I already claimed it was late.

 

When I explained that this policy was retarded and anyone could do it anytime they wanted, all they had to say was "pretty much". Crooks.

 

He has signed for one letter from me, but none since then. I get the feeling he does this kind of thing a lot. Never tried a box however, I have a nice Amazon one sitting next to me now, could give it a try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

If you think he is systematically and routinely defrauding consumer en-masse then this is a criminal matter. He maybe just that, a crook.

 

In law, its called obtaining a money transfer by deception. The legislation is Section 15(a) of the Theft Act 1968.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find who he has been selling to on fleabay and contact them. Ask if they have had any problem with him & his goods & if so collect all the info. Then if you have a few people who have been deceived by him contact his local police force and get each aggrieved to register each one as a deception crime.

They will then look into it :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

You dont need to write to HMLR. You can check online whether he owns his property. My post above shows how. You just need his name & address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The clerk attended the address and spoke to his "other half" in person, she confimed that she did know him, but claimed that he had never lived there and that she did not know his whereabouts. (This is a lie, I have spoken to him on the phone since) So I know the address is a valid one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is how I would do it...

 

File an N1 at the County Court compelling PayPal to disclose the address they have no record for him, as well as his bank account details, under Section 35 of the Date Protection Act. On granting the Order PayPal would have to comply.

 

Once you have his bank details, obtain a third party debt order against his bank.

 

PayPal can levy a fee for gathering the information (the court has discretion to set the amount but often does not, it tends to be in the range of £100 per hour, but for the amount of work they need to do it wouldnt be an immense expense). Bear in mind though that you should be able to tack all of these costs onto him.

 

Davjoh

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is how I would do it...

 

File an N1 at the County Court compelling PayPal to disclose the address they have no record for him, as well as his bank account details, under Section 35 of the Date Protection Act. On granting the Order PayPal would have to comply.

 

Once you have his bank details, obtain a third party debt order against his bank.

 

PayPal can levy a fee for gathering the information (the court has discretion to set the amount but often does not, it tends to be in the range of £100 per hour, but for the amount of work they need to do it wouldnt be an immense expense). Bear in mind though that you should be able to tack all of these costs onto him.

 

Davjoh

 

Would this work - Paypal are based in Luxembourg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

To trade in the UK they would need to be regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Everyone handling client money in the UK must be regulated by law.

 

Check the public register and this will give a contact address. If they don't have one then your complaint should be directed to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

If you have lost money in a paypal transaction, you can apply to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

 

Paypal may be operating from offshre to exclude themselves from liability under UK law, so have you explored chargeback?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they don't! (Need FSA approval) that would be a restraint of trade within EU boundaries.

 

They are actually a credit institution, authorised by the Commission de Surveilance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), the Luxembourg equivalent of the FSA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would this work - Paypal are based in Luxembourg

 

IMHO yes, they trade and market directly to UK customers, so our courts have adequate jurisdiction. PayPal have a UK address (based in Surrey I believe) on the Companies House Website.

 

The worst that could happen is PayPal argue jurisdiction, which I feel is unlikely to happen, you're only seeking discovery of information on a third party, and you have probable cause to do so.

 

2p.

 

Davjoh

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do not have a valid address for courrt service. a pursuer would need a 'Registered Office' within the UK juristiction and they do not have this. Service on any old UK address or the fact they have a token presence at all won't cut it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PayPal Limited, Paypal (UK) Limited and Paypal (Europe) Limited are all UK registered companies. The first is registered in Aldermaston, the second two in Richmond Surrey. You need to make sure you get the right company.

There are a lot of misconceptions about service under the CPR - you do NOT need to serve onthe registered office of a company. The correct addresses for service on a company are as follows:

 

Company registered in England and Walesbull_black.gif Principal office of the company; or

bull_black.gif Any place of business of the company within the jurisdiction which has a real connection with the claim.

Any other company or corporationbull_black.gif Any place within the jurisdiction where the corporation carries on its activities; or

bull_black.gif Any place of business of the company within the jurisdiction

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid not. Their status changed last June (5 months ago), and they registered from the FSA on the same date. All PayPal account holders were formally advised.

 

Since the company is no longer registered in the UK (this was an Electronic Funds service) it is now a Bank registered in Luxembourg).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't suggest they did. I gave the details of three companies which have their registered office in the UK; I did not at any time say any of these were the correct company in this case.

In any event, if the correct company carries on business in the UK the OP can serve them at that place of business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...