Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is great news. Many people would have given up and paid after losing two appeals so well done for hanging in and fighting. It has paid off and they have finally backed down before getting whipped in Court. I looked at your NTD and your NTK again to see if there was a chance of going for a breach of your GDPR. Sadly although your NTK on its own could have well deserved a claim, the NTD is good enough not to warrant a claim even though it wasn;t compliant with PoFA. As it is the first Notice that mostly accounts for  GDPR breaches there is a reasonable cause for the NTD to have been issued. However you are now freed from worries about appearing in Court and you have learnt about the dangers of parking especially where the rogues that patrol private parking spaces are concerned. Thank you for making a donation and should you fall victim in the future to the parking rogues or anything else that we protect from, you are always welcome .
    • Hi guys I'm about to submit the defence as per below     There has been no reply to our CPR 31:14 request.  Is it worth adding that I (driver, not registered keeper) didn't actually enter or park in the car park and was sat at the petrol station forecourt the entire time?  Or is that covered by the simple points?   Thanks
    • a DCA is not a bailiff and cant enforce anything, even if they've been to court who are they please? sar to the original creditor FIO isnt applicable they are not a public body. who was this query sent too all the more reason to teach her young upon how these powerless DCA's monsters  work... she must stop payments now  
    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

experian and equifax


razorc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just subscribed to checkmyfile.com the site compares 3 agencies and I just had to laugh. I had settled a TSB credit card balance sometime ago and had I not checked I would have a default against me forever.

A notice of correction has been filed with the credit refrence agency a few days ago and will take 28 days tobe investigated so I am told.

 

The Experian file is based on public infomation only - so will reflect the type of result that most companies, landlords and employers can see when they search you.

 

Callcredit and Equifax files are more representive of what only the top 200 or so lenders can see when they search you. In addition to public file infomation these also contain your search and account performance history.

 

Incidently my callcredit file is 4 stars whilst my Equifax file is not so healthy. Funny that, don't you think.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just subscribed to checkmyfile.com the site compares 3 agencies and I just had to laugh. I had settled a TSB credit card balance sometime ago and had I not checked I would have a default against me forever.

A notice of correction has been filed with the credit refrence agency a few days ago and will take 28 days tobe investigated so I am told.

1. Defaults are on your account 6 years, not forever.

 

2. Even if it was settled, if the default was entered before settlement it will remain on your account for six years.

 

3. Defaults can be removed if you can prove that your default was there purely because of unlawful charges which placed you in a default position; or some other mitigating factor. Otherwise, once defaulted, that's IT for six years, whether you settle or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2. Even if it was settled, if the default was entered before settlement it will remain on your account for six years.

 

Actually when a default is settled it is marked as such and the default disappeares. Technically there is a difference between Settled and Satisfied (paid on time, closed account without issue) but the markers in at least Experian use the "S" symbol for both Settled and Satisfied so paying off a defaulted debt makes a huge difference.

 

Funny story. Well not really but interesting. A few years ago working for one of the big credit card lenders, i was collecting an account. This person had issues which meant her family had to keep sorting out her debts. They chose to pay them off each time she was defaulted. Of course the way that the "S" works this meant she was a prime target for new credit which due to the same issues she happily took out. And so the cycle continued, each time with higher total debts.

 

Regards,

Eduin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually when a default is settled it is marked as such and the default disappeares. Technically there is a difference between Settled and Satisfied (paid on time, closed account without issue) but the markers in at least Experian use the "S" symbol for both Settled and Satisfied so paying off a defaulted debt makes a huge difference.

 

It is the same with Equifax a green "S" for settled/satisfied where as Experian favour a serene blue "S"

 

I have also been informed that registering a personal notice of correction on one's credit file is as good as a default in the eyes of some searcher's:eek:

So now I know that the issue is now being investigated I have requested that the notice of correction is to be removed post haste. And informed the other agency of my dispute of which is also being investigated.

 

In my recent dealings with credit refrence agencies I have found them to be very helpful in telephone conversations, and it would appear to me that they are in the dark until ordinary Joe off the street has to look at his file, and then dispute's.

The fact there is more than one agency baffles me, financial institutions that supply a service imho should state in terms before supply, with which credit refrence agency/s they will be recording entries with and whom they share your personal infomation with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you ask before you apply for credit 'Which credit reference agency do you use?'

I have not myself asked before a search...but consider that a search on a CRA file leaves a footprint and that too many footprints can be detrimental to the overall credit score on the file that has been searched.

 

In reply to your question... I would have to say it would be down to personal choice, however, me being me I would contact the customer service dept of the organisation that I would be considering first.

 

The money saving expert Martin Lewis's site has an interesting page as a rule of thumb 'who uses who', tho Im not sure if it is up to date or not.

 

Credit Reference Agencies - Who uses who? | UK's only money saving expert,

 

If this helps don't click the scale's, just donate:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another frustrating factor is when one has to repair the damage when innacurate data has been recorded or has not been updated on a CRA' file by an institution and then have to contact every CRA's yourself to repair it (should charge me thinks to the incompetent institution concerned) .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not myself asked before a search...but consider that a search on a CRA file leaves a footprint and that too many footprints can be detrimental to the overall credit score on the file that has been searched.

 

In reply to your question... I would have to say it would be down to personal choice, however, me being me I would contact the customer service dept of the organisation that I would be considering first.

 

The money saving expert Martin Lewis's site has an interesting page as a rule of thumb 'who uses who', tho Im not sure if it is up to date or not.

 

Credit Reference Agencies - Who uses who? | UK's only money saving expert,

 

If this helps don't click the scale's, just donate:)

 

 

I'm not convinced this is right as my Call credit report is great - even get a "checkmyfile" score of 5 out of 5 etc, but american express wont touch me and they only use them according to this lol...it would be great if you could find out this info before applying and being refused.

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not convinced this is right as my Call credit report is great - even get a "checkmyfile" score of 5 out of 5 etc, but american express wont touch me and they only use them according to this lol...it would be great if you could find out this info before applying and being refused.

 

I did mension that I was not sure if it was upto date or not, however the chat forum link on there has a few posts regarding who uses who and the other link I found quite infomative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...