Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest CCA/Deed of Assignment etc request


philby21
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6040 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I've spent a lot of time looking through various Capquest threads for anything similar to the situation I am dealing with for my wife.

 

Capquest apparently bought a debt for a credit card my wife used to have from Solutions Finance and are now pursuing it with their usual tactics.

 

We sent of a CCA request which also requested a statement of account, a copy of the executed deed of assignment and a fair processing notice.

 

Eventually (after the 12+2 days but before the criminal default time limit) the CCA copy appeared which was a photocopy of the original signed agreement.

 

What I am wondering now is what is the legal standing regarding the other items requested at the time? Are we in a position to question Capquests legal rights to pursue this debt if they fail to provide a deed of assignment?

 

We have recently had their standard format threat letter which waffles on about bailiffs etc and are treating this with the contempt it deserves (I had a CCJ years ago and am well aware of how hollow this threat is).

 

Any advice on where we go from here would be appreciated. I was originally going to offer a token payment (can't afford much more at the moment but that's a whole other story!) but their latest letter just makes me want to drag out the fight!:)

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm planning on taking a close look at the CCA when I get chance. I'm just wondering whether I have any legal standing with regards to demanding that they prove they have a valid claim by producing a deed of assignment etc.

 

I am aware that they would have to produce this in court and that it would not favour them if they have failed to do so when requested earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCA does NOT entitle you to a copy of the deed of assignment, only the agreement and statement of account.

That's it.

 

As ODC says the agreement MUST include certain information to be valid and enforceable.

These are the prescribed terms.

 

 

S61(1)(a) CCA provides that, for a regulated agreement to be properly executed, it must contain all the prescribed terms of the agreement and conform to regulations under s60(1) – see Q1.14.

 

Reg 6(1) provides that the terms specified in Sch 6 to the Agreements Regulations are ‘prescribed terms’ for the purposes of s61(1)(a) and s127(3) – see Q8.2.

 

8.2 What if prescribed terms are missing or incorrect?

 

s127(3) provides that the court may not make an enforcement order unless a document containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor – see Q1.21.

 

If therefore any of the prescribed terms is missing, or incorrect, the agreement is not enforceable against the debtor, and the court is precluded from making an enforcement order.

 

 

8.3 What are the prescribed terms?

 

The prescribed terms specified in Sch 6 are as follows:

 

* amount of credit – see Q8.

 

* credit limit – see Q8.5

* repayments – see Q8.9.

* rate of interest – see Q8.6

 

Sch 6 was not amended by the 2004 Regulations.

 

 

Also check out Peter Bard's excellent thread on the subject: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/103383-agreement-enforceability.html

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Curlyben, that saves me having to find the prescribed terms again! I'll check what they have sent ASAP.

 

Still not received a statement of account, I'm also interested to know my legal standing with regards to questioning their authority to enforce this debt, any ideas??

 

Thanks,

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the quality is too brilliant either.
Is the copy of the agreement legible?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi philby21,

 

Firstly,

 

If all they have provided you with it a copy of the application form (ie no t&c's or a statement of account) then they have not fulfilled their obligations under a section 78 request, as such they remain in default until they do. While they are in default they cannot enforce the debt.

 

We need to see a copy of the alleged agreement if possible to ascertain whether it is enforcable, as Ben stated it must contain all prescribed terms, be readily legible and be signed by the debtor as a bare minimum to be considered legally enforcable.

 

you mentioned that Capquest have bought the debt, did you receive any notice of assignment be it from the original creditor or Capquest? If so can you post up the details.

 

kind regards,

shane

 

 

If my post has been useful please click the scales

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I have taken a look at the copy of the agreement and it appears to be a photocopy of a fax. Although it is difficult to read it does appear to contain all the prescribed terms and is signed by my wife.

 

I have asked her whether she remembers receiving a notice of assignment but she does not recall having seen one from either company. If I remember correctly the first notice she got was when Capquest started sending letters and telephoning chasing payment (we soon put a stop to the telephone calls!!).

 

I can scan the agreement but how do I post it here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can scan the agreement but how do I post it here?

Have a read here towards the bottom http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

legibility is an issue but i can just about make out most of it. It seems to contain the prescribed terms for an in running credit agreement. It says at the top 2/2 is there a page 1 they sent you?

 

Also, it mentions in the cancellation box that they wil send you exact details of how you can cancel, if they never issued these in accordance with s64 of the Act the debt could be unenforcable by virtue of s127(4) of the Act

 

As a requirement of their obligations under a CCA request the creditor must send you the agreement and any other document referred to in it, be it the cancellationd details or further t&c's the agreement makes reference to. Until they provide these they are in default meaning they are unable to enforce.

 

kind regards

shane

 

Oh I also blotted out all your personal details on the form!

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, thanks for the help - everyone!

 

Secondly, as the CCA appears to be a photocopy of a fax then I presumed that the missing '1/2' was actually a fax cover sheet. It looks to me like Capquest had to go begging to the original company for this!

 

As to any other documents, all they sent was a covering letter, nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...