Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • filed the defence at same time as suggested @dx100uk
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Grammar - Get it right!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5353 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

the French language society were trying to ban the word "weekend" from the French language because it was an English word. They have no word that means weekend so why not use one from another language?

 

They did, and we do :razz:. It is called "fin de semaine", which is the perfect translation of week-end. It just doesn't roll off the tongue in quite the same way, though. :p

 

However, the French Language Society do not represent the view of the population, and they were largely unsuccesful in their attempts. Weekend was only one of the words they wanted banned, Walkman being the other I remember. They had to invent a French word ("baladeur") to replace walkman.

 

Although they went completely OTT on this, I would point out that since the 50-60s, France became so inundated with the Anglo-Saxon influence that there was a real worry that the language would get mangled beyond recognition, which led to this extreme reaction. Here, you don't have the same problem, or not to the same extent, as American is essentially English, so variations in the language won't affect it quite as much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

With regard to American I do wonder how someone from the Bronx uses punctuation (I suspect as a weapon) :rolleyes:

 

 

De spring is sprung

De grass is riz

I wonder where de boidies is

De liddle boids is on de wing

But dat's absoid

De liddle wings is on de boid!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Tihs colud be a pirme exmaple of tihs pirnpicle. By scnannig the snetneces, wtihuot tihnknig aobut it it bceomes psosbile to raed the txet, qicukly and acucartley, wthiout dfifciluty.

:D

that's why the advertising campaign for FCUK was so successful ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back to the original subject, and related issues, yes, it does matter.

 

We had a thread here a few months back which puzzled us a good deal for a while. OP had gone to court on a non-compliance of a CCA, and because the creditors/solicitors had (allegedly) doctored his documents. However, when reporting it here, he forgot the comma. The way the phrase went, it looked as if OP had just admitted in writing here that he was the one who had doctored documents put in front of the judge.

 

Well, that got us worried for a bit, I can assure you all! So yes, just one simple comma goes astray, and the whole meaning changes.

 

In French, one of the classics is this:

 

At the battle of Fontenoy (11/05/1725), the Count of Anteroche is reported to have said: "Messieurs les Anglais, tirez les premiers!" (Sir Englishmen, shoot first!) which would be in the fine tradition of reciprocal courtesy that prevailed amongst the aristocrats at the time.

However, it could be understood differently:

"Messieurs! Les Anglais! Tirez les premiers!" would mean: "Gentlemen! The English! Shoot first!" which is a completely different story. :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

*RANT ALERT*

 

Couldn't agree more Bookie. I've just spent the last couple of days assessing students' grammar and punctuation for my university and am shocked about how their perception of how good they are matches with how they actually perform.

 

And I'm shocked by some of the posts that I see on this site - particularly some of the proposed letters (not those in the CAG library, natch!), that are posted for others to copy and paste.

 

While I am aware that I also make the odd typo online, I think there is no excuse for this when submitting official letters.

 

Ok, rant over - I'll get back in my box.

 

:)

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last edited by Hippy-chick : Today at 01:45. Reason: typo, lol

 

:-D :-D :-D

 

I tend to over punctuate, if anything. Punctuation is much more used in French, and like my accent when I speak, it is something I have never quite lost. Having said that, one of my teachers told me that punctuation is like breathing, so never hesitate to put it in. :-D

 

Further away from grammar is the habit of people to write posts in one solid block. You'd think they were being charged for the space! People, hit that return key from time to time, and create PARAGRAPHS! Argghhhhh! :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please please please, those that can't use the correct spellling of "there" "their" and "they're"

 

There - There is an adverb meaning "that location." It is sometimes used with the verb to be as an idiom. It is spelled like here which means "this location."

 

Example: I put the collar right there. (that location).

Their - Their is a possesive pronoun. It always describes a noun.

 

Example: Their dog has fleas. (possessive of they).

 

They're - They're is a contraction of they are. Note the spelling: The a from are is replaced by an apostrophe.

 

Example: They're 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. (contraction of they are).

 

It's not that difficult, surely?

 

I think you will find it is possessive

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-D :-D :-D

 

....... and like my accent when I speak, it is something I have never quite lost.

 

 

You have an accent Bookie? can't say that I had noticed :lol:

 

Bloooooooooooming Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurgers

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my head, Auntie Bookie sounds like the various Mam'zelles from the Enid Blyton boarding school books, St. Clare's and Malory Towers...

 

"Zut alors!!"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*runs and hides behind the blackboard * ;)

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

*RANT ALERT*

 

Couldn't agree more Bookie. I've just spent the last couple of days assessing students' grammar and punctuation for my university and am shocked about how their perception of how good they are matches with how they actually perform.

 

And I'm shocked by some of the posts that I see on this site - particularly some of the proposed letters (not those in the CAG library, natch!), that are posted for others to copy and paste.

 

While I am aware that I also make the odd typo online, I think there is no excuse for this when submitting official letters.

 

Ok, rant over - I'll get back in my box.

 

:)

 

Oh, don't get me started on students and their atrocious spelling, grammar, punctuation, style, presentation ... :o science students tend to be the worst offenders. What they have been learning in their English lessons I just can't imagine!!! And I work at a really prestigious university :rolleyes: ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5353 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...